Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,715,772 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Use of reclaimed wastewater in municipal drinking-water supplies.


The demand for drinking water drinking water

supply of water available to animals for drinking supplied via nipples, in troughs, dams, ponds and larger natural water sources; an insufficient supply leads to dehydration; it can be the source of infection, e.g. leptospirosis, salmonellosis, or of poisoning, e.g.
 in cities and the lack of new water sources have spurred water conservation and recycling measures over the last 30 years. Coupled with advances in water treatment technology, this need is motivating some cities to supplement drinking-water supplies with reclaimed wastewater. But important questions remain about the level of treatment, monitoring, and testing needed to ensure public safety.

Issues in Potable potable /pot·a·ble/ (po´tah-b'l) fit to drink.

po·ta·ble
adj.
Fit to drink; drinkable.



potable

fit to drink.
 Water Reuse, a new report from NRC NRC
abbr.
1. National Research Council

2. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Noun 1. NRC - an independent federal agency created in 1974 to license and regulate nuclear power plants
, concludes that reclaimed wastewater can supplement drinking-water sources, but only as a last resort and only after a thorough health and safety evaluation. Municipalities must fully assess health impacts from likely contaminants and develop comprehensive systems for monitoring, testing, and treatment.

Uncertainties Must Be Addressed

Because regulations for safe drinking water were not developed with reclaimed water Reclaimed water, sometimes called recycled water, is former wastewater (sewage) that has been treated and purified for reuse, rather than discharged into a body of water.  in mind, they may not be the best standard for testing its quality Reclaimed water may be contaminated contaminated,
v 1. made radioactive by the addition of small quantities of radioactive material.
2. made contaminated by adding infective or radiographic materials.
3. an infective surface or object.
 in ways that cannot be determined through current testing or treatment processes.

The report distinguishes between direct and indirect use of reclaimed wastewater. Adding highly treated wastewater directly into a water supply without storing it first in a reservoir is not a viable option. Indirect use is viable, however, and the report examines that approach. Indirect use augments the drinking-water supply by adding reclaimed treated water first to a lake, reservoir, or underground aquifer. The mixture of natural and reclaimed water is then subjected to normal water treatment before it is distributed as drinking water for the community. Since the 1960s, Los Angeles County, California Los Angeles County is a county in California and is by far the most populous county in the United States. Figures from the U.S. Census Bureau give an estimated 2006 population of 9,948,081 residents,[1] while the California State government's population bureau lists a , has operated an indirect-use system in which wastewater, mixed with storm water and river water, supplies about 16 percent of total flow into groundwater basins. This mixture then is used as a source for drinking water.

Other reclaimed-water projects in the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area.  supply northern Virginia; Orange County, California Orange County is a county in Southern California, United States. Its county seat is Santa Ana. According to the 2000 Census, its population was 2,846,289, making it the second most populous county in the state of California, and the fifth most populous in the United States. ; and Phoenix. Feasibility studies have been conducted by the cities of San Diego and Tampa. Limited data from projects and studies nationwide show that highly treated reclaimed wastewater has produced drinking water of excellent quality, and that no obvious health effects have been found in animal tests or in communities where reclaimed water has been used. These results are insufficient, however, and more information is needed.

Given health and safety concerns, the report identifies three priorities for water agencies that add treated wastewater to their systems or are considering doing so.

Evaluation of Potential Health Effects of Possible Contaminants

All major household, industrial, and agricultural chemical contaminants in reclaimed water should be documented and removed according to existing federal clean-water standards. It is unclear whether highly treated wastewater contains harmful levels of byproducts from disinfection disinfection,
n the process of destroying pathogenic organisms or rendering them inert.

disinfection, full oral cavity,
n a procedure used to reduce active periodontal disease, usually completed within a certain short time frame.
 processes such as chlorination chlorination Public health Addition of chlorinated compounds to drinking water as disinfectants. Cf Ozonation. , and this issue should be addressed by the research community. U.S. EPA EPA eicosapentaenoic acid.

EPA
abbr.
eicosapentaenoic acid


EPA,
n.pr See acid, eicosapentaenoic.

EPA,
n.
 should sponsor a study to develop methods for better detection of new pathogens. Most outbreaks of waterborne disease in the United States are caused by parasites and viruses, yet few drinking-water systems monitor for the full range of such pathogens.

Assessment of the Health Risks of Drinking Reclaimed Water

Conventional toxicology tests developed by the food and drug industries are not appropriate for evaluating the risks from complex chemical mixtures that can be found in reclaimed water. Alternative studies, such as tests with fish in source water, should be undertaken to provide a broader range of data about possible harmful effects. Research also is needed on the level of viruses and parasites in all waters and the effectiveness both of conventional and of advanced water treatment processes in removing these pathogens. The federal government should undertake population studies that compare the disease rates over time.

Monitoring of the Reliability and Operation of Water Treatment Systems

Safe, reliable operation of a reclaimed-water treatment system depends on two factors: good design that provides redundant safety measures safety measures,
n.pl actions (e.g., use of glasses, face masks) taken to protect patients and office personnel from such known hazards as particles and aerosols from high-speed rotary instruments, mercury vapor, radiation exposure, anesthetic and
 to prevent contamination, and monitoring systems that detect variations in water quality and system performance. Other measures should be implemented as well. Since waterborne viruses, bacteria, and parasites pose the greatest threat to public safety, water treatment procedures for removing them should necessarily be the most stringent. Communities that use reclaimed water should implement well-coordinated public health surveillance systems to document and provide early warning of any adverse health effects associated with the ingestion ingestion /in·ges·tion/ (-chun) the taking of food, drugs, etc., into the body by mouth.

in·ges·tion
n.
1. The act of taking food and drink into the body by the mouth.

2.
 of reclaimed water.

Further Information

Copies of Issues in Potable Reuse: The Viability of Augmenting Drinking-Water Supplies with Reclaimed Water are available from the National Academy Press for $34.95 plus shipping. Orders can be placed by telephone at (202) 334-3313 or (800) 624-6242.
COPYRIGHT 1998 National Environmental Health Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Journal of Environmental Health
Date:Jun 1, 1998
Words:746
Previous Article:Dangers of radon exposure and smoking compound each other.
Next Article:U.S. EPA report on decentralized wastewater systems.
Topics:



Related Articles
Controversy Swirls around Toilet-to-Tap Project.
IS REUSED WATER SAFE? EXPERTS FEAR UNKNOWN SUBSTANCES COULD LURK IN SUPPLY.(News)
WESTLAKE SPRING PROVES WATERSHED FIND FOR AREA TURF.(News)
CITY TO RECYCLE WATER; POPULATION GROWTH OUTPACING SUPPLY.(NEWS)
RECLAMATION PROJECTS TAP INTO WATER NEEDS.(NEWS)
TREATED WATER ON TAP; APPROVAL PLEASES GROWERS.(NEWS)
WELL WATER TREATMENT PROPOSAL APPROVED.(NEWS)
FAUCETS YIELD A SMELLY SURPRISE; TAINTED WATER HITS CALABASAS.(News)
STATE CAUTIONS RESIDENTS TO STICK TO BOTTLED WATER.(NEWS)
Resistance to recycling of water will wear down drop by drop.(The future of Los Angeles: setting an agenda)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles