Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,506,104 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Update on Pennexx Foods, Inc., $226,000,000.00 Fraud Claim against Smithfield Foods, Inc.; Pennexx Seeks Court Order to Begin Discovery.


Business Editors/Legal Writers

PHILADELPHIA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 17, 2004

Pennexx Foods, Inc., (NASDAQ NASDAQ
 in full National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations

U.S. market for over-the-counter securities. Established in 1971 by the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), NASDAQ is an automated quotation system that reports on
 pink sheets: PNNX) today announced that on May 14, 2004 it filed a motion to conduct discovery on its Cross-Claim against Smithfield Foods, Inc., (NYSE NYSE

See: New York Stock Exchange
: SFD SFD Single Family Dwelling
SFD Sacramento Fire Department (California, USA)
SFD Start of Frame Delimiter (networking)
SFD Saudi Fund for Development
SFD Seattle Fire Department
) seeking damages of $226,000,000.00 in a class action securities suit brought against Pennexx and Smithfield and former Pennexx directors on July 24, 2003 in federal court in Philadelphia.

Pennexx filed its Cross-Claim against Smithfield in a securities class action case pending before Judge John R. Padova in federal court in Philadelphia. The securities class action case is captioned The Winer Family Trust v. Michael Queen, Dennis Bland, Thomas McGreal, Joseph W. Luter, IV, Michael H. Cole, Smithfield Foods, Inc., and Pennexx Foods, Inc., Case No. 03-4318, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania is one of the original 13 federal judiciary districts created by the Judiciary Act of 1789. It originally sat in Independence Hall in Philadelphia as the United States District Court for the District of . The Court has ordered that the case will enter the Civil Trial Pool on November 1, 2004, and the final pre-trial conference will be held November 4, 2004 with all parties prepared to commence trial on that date.

Pennexx ceased operations in June 2003 after Smithfield foreclosed on its assets and took over its operations. Prior to the takeover by Smithfield, Pennexx was a leading provider of case-ready meat to retail supermarkets in the Northeast, such as Pathmark. Pennexx cut, packaged, processed and delivered case-ready beef, pork, lamb and veal in compliance with the United States Department of Agriculture United States Department of Agriculture (USDA),
n.pr established in 1862, USDA is responsible for the safety of meat, poultry, and egg products. It conducts ongoing research in areas from human nutrition to new crop technologies and also helps ensure open
 ("USDA USDA,
n.pr See United States Department of Agriculture.
") regulations.

Pennexx commenced operations in 1999, as the company recognized the opportunity to stake out a first-to-market position in the emerging market category for case-ready meat. The Cross-Claim alleges that in early 2001, Pennexx rejected an inquiry to purchase the company by Smithfield. In June 2001, Smithfield acquired 50% of the common stock of Pennexx and provided the company a credit facility to fund the expansion of its operations. Smithfield is the leading processor and marketer of fresh pork and processed meats in the United States with annual sales of $8 billion. According to the Cross-Claim, Pennexx and Smithfield were to work together through a joint venture in servicing the market in the Northeast United States with case-ready meat. The Cross-Claims states that Pennexx also agreed to assist Smithfield by servicing Smithfield's branded pork to the New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
 market.

To meet increased demand and accommodate future growth under its joint venture with Smithfield, Pennexx purchased a 145,000 square foot building on ten acres in Philadelphia in April 2002. As part of the joint venture, Smithfield agreed to renovate the building into a state-of-the-art, automated plant for producing case-ready meats. The Cross-Claim alleges that Smithfield mis-designed the new plant in Philadelphia. The design problems with the plant then allegedly caused Pennexx to suffer financial losses that triggered a default under the company's credit facility with Smithfield. Smithfield then foreclosed upon Pennexx, seized its assets and took over its operations. The Cross-Claim further alleges that Smithfield now operates the Philadelphia plant under a legal entity called Showcase.

Safe Harbor Safe Harbor

1. A legal provision to reduce or eliminate liability as long as good faith is demonstrated.

2. A form of shark repellent implemented by a target company acquiring a business that is so poorly regulated that the target itself is less attractive.
 

Certain statements made herein that use the words "alleges," "alleged," "allegedly," "seeks," "will be held," "claims," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) implemented several significant substantive changes affecting certain cases brought under the federal securities laws, including changes related to pleading, discovery, liability, class representation and awards fees and  of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties which could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company's litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
 to be materially different from those which may be expressed or implied by such statements, including, among others, risks or uncertainties associated with the litigation efforts of the Company.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 17, 2004
Words:586
Previous Article:PRG-Schultz and Austin-Tetra Collaborate on Improving Supplier Management.
Next Article:Signature Special Event Services Awarded Contracts by 3 Major Golf Events to Tent 800,000 Sq. Feet and Build 1,000,000-plus Sq. Feet of Flooring and...



Related Articles
Spinal bone screw litigation gets new life from Third Circuit.(medical equipment consulting company's alleged fraud against Food and Drug...
Busting open the big box: Wal-Mart and other large corporations fight hard to keep documents that are relevant to plaintiffs' claims sealed up tight....
Smithfield Foods Inc., Smithfield, Va., and American Foods Group Inc. have terminated discussions regarding the agreement for Smithfield Foods to...
Love lost. (Law).(Love's BBQ franchise owner sues Custom Food Franchise Group Inc.)(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court issues $4.26 billion judgment against Uzan family of Turkey for perpetrating massive global fraud, according to Motorola.
BRIEFCASE.(Business)
DA can search welfare homes without warrant, U.S. court rules.(INCOME & EMPLOYMENT)(district attorney)(Brief article)
High court gives clarity to litigation venues: in a key decision issued earlier this year, the Supreme Court has restricted the ability of...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles