Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,552,905 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

US military not adequately prepared for homeland attack, report says


Should a catastrophic attack hit the United States, the military would not be ready to thwart it, and National Guard forces lack both the equipment and the training to handle the job, according to a report.

Even fewer Army National Guard units are combat-ready today than almost a year ago when a Commission on the National Guard and Reserves determined that 88 percent of the units were not prepared for the fight, the commission says in the report released Thursday.

The independent panel is commissioned by Congress to recommend changes in law and policy concerning the Guard and Reserves.

The commission's 400-page report concludes that the nation "does not have sufficient trained, ready forces available" to respond to a chemical, biological or nuclear weapons incident, "an appalling gap that places the nation and its citizens at greater risk."

"Right now we don't have the forces we need, we don't have them trained, we don't have the equipment," commission Chairman Arnold Punaro said in an interview with The Associated Press. "Even though there is a lot going on in this area, we need to do a lot more. ... There's a lot of things in the pipeline, but in the world we live in, you're either ready or you're not."

In response, Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart, chief of U.S. Northern command, said the Defense Department is putting together a specialized military team that would be designed to respond to such catastrophic events.

"The capability for the Defense Department to respond to a chemical, biological event exists now," Renuart told the AP. "It, today, is not as robust as we would like because of the demand on the forces that we've placed across the country. ... I can do it today. It would be harder on the (military) services, but I could respond."

Over the next year, Renuart said, specific active duty, Guard and Reserve units will be trained, equipped and assigned to a three-tiered response force totaling about 4,000 troops. There would be a few hundred first responders, who would be followed by a second wave of about 1,200 troops that would include medical and logistics forces.

The third wave, with the remainder of that initial 4,000 troops, would include aircraft units, engineers, and other support forces, depending on the type of incident.

Punaro, a retired Marine Corps major general, had sharp criticism for Northern Command, saying that commanders there have made little progress developing detailed response plans for attacks against the United States.

"NorthCom has got to get religion in this area," said Punaro. He said the military needs to avoid "pickup game" type responses, such as the much-criticized federal reaction to Hurricane Katrina, and put in place the kind of detailed plans that exist for virtually any international crisis.

He also underscored the commission's main finding: the Pentagon must move toward making the National Guard and Reserves an integral part of the U.S. military.

The panel, in its No. 1 recommendation, said the Defense Department must use the nation's citizen soldiers to create an operational force that would be fully trained, equipped and ready to defend the nation, respond to crises and supplement the active duty troops in combat.

Pointing to the continued strain on the military, as it fights wars on two fronts, the panel said the United States has "no reasonable alternative" other than to continue to rely heavily on the reserves to supplement the active duty forces both at home and abroad.

Using reserves as a permanent, ready force, the commission argued, would be a much more cost-effective way to supplement the military since they are about 70 percent cheaper than active duty troops.

Asked how much it would cost to implement the panel's recommendations, Punaro said it will take billions to fully equip the Guard. The commission is going to ask the Congressional Budget Office to do a cost analysis, he said.

While noting that equipment for the reserves has increased in recent years, the report details a shortfall of about $48 billion (euro32.3 billion) for equipment as of 2007. And in a detailed map, it shows that in more than half the states, Army Guard units have less than 50 percent of the equipment they need.

Overall, the panel made 95 recommendations, including many personnel, pay, benefits, promotional and other policy changes. The majority, commission members said Thursday, could be implemented immediately or in quick fashion after congressional action. But other more substantive overhauls, Punaro said, could take years.

___

On the Net:

Commission on the National Guard and Reserve's report: http://www.cngr.gov/Final%20Report/CNGR%20Final%20Report.pdf

Copyright 2008 AP Features
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright (c) Mochila, Inc.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:LOLITA C. BALDOR
Publication:AP Features
Date:Feb 1, 2008
Words:759
Previous Article:Army suicides, attempts rise again despite increased mental health programs
Next Article:New Orleans humming pre-Mardi Gras



Related Articles
Editor's corner.(Editorial)(Brief Article)
EDITORIAL CATACLYSMIC FAILURE FOUR YEARS AFTER 9-11, WE SHOULD BE BETTER PREPARED.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Chem-bio readiness doubtful at home and away, says GAO.(SECURITY BEAT: Homeland Defense Briefs)
Gates rejects emergency command proposal
Gates rejects emergency command proposal
The Gravest Threat of All

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles