Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,557,847 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S.-Canadian cross-border retirement planning.


The United States and Canada have a free trade agreement in place that allows the unrestricted movement of goods and services In economics, economic output is divided into physical goods and intangible services. Consumption of goods and services is assumed to produce utility (unless the "good" is a "bad"). It is often used when referring to a Goods and Services Tax.  across their borders. This free mobility has created situations in which employees are transferred outside of their home country. Often while in the host country, the employees are earning pension benefits or making contributions into their own retirement accounts.

Once their foreign assignments end, some of these employees decide to retire in the host country. This decision raises certain questions about the treatment of retirement benefits that the employees may have earned throughout their careers.

Guidance may be found in:

* IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  Letter Ruling 8601047.

* IRS Letter Ruling 8633081.

* IRS Letter Ruling 8911001.

* Rev. Rul. 58-247.

* Rev. Rul. 56-446.

* Rev. Rul. 89-95.

* U.S.-Canada Treaty Article XVIII.

The following examples illustrate the application of these rules.

Example 1: T is a U.S. citizen who worked and resided in Canada. While there, T and his U.S. employer made contributions to his U.S. retirement account. T retires and remains in Canada. He begins to receive pension payments from his U.S. employer's pension plan.

Since T is a U.S. citizen, he is subject to tax on his worldwide taxable income Under the federal tax law, gross income reduced by adjustments and allowable deductions. It is the income against which tax rates are applied to compute an individual or entity's tax liability. The essence of taxable income is the accrual of some gain, profit, or benefit to a taxpayer.  and the U.S.-Canadian treaty provisions are not relevant for U.S. tax purposes. In Canada, under the treaty, to the extent such benefits are partially excluded from U.S. taxation, such benefits must also be partially excluded from Canadian taxation.

Example 2: A is a Canadian citizen who worked and resided in the United States. While in the United States, he earned U.S. pension benefits. He returns to Canada and retires. After his retirement, A began receiving annuity payments from the U.S. pension plan.

Since A is a Canadian citizen and resident, he will not be taxed in the United States on the annuity payments he receives. However, he will be subject to a 15% U.S. withholding tax The amount legally deducted from an employee's wages or salary by the employer, who uses it to prepay the charges imposed by the government on the employee's yearly earnings.  on these payments.

Example 3: B is a U.S. citizen who worked and resided in Canada. B retires and returns to the United States. He receives Canadian social security benefits. Under the treaty, the United States must exempt one-half of his Canadian benefits.

Example 4: Assume the same facts as in Example 3, except that B is a Canadian citizen who retires in the United States. Again, based on the treaty, the United States would exempt one-half of B's Canadian benefit payments.

Example 5: C, a U.S. citizen, is a beneficiary of a Canadian registered retirement savings plan Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP)

Tax-sheltered retirement plan for Canadian citizens, much like an American IRA.
 (RRSP See Registered Retirement Savings Plan.

RRSP

See registered retirement savings plan (RRSP).
), which was established while he worked and resided in Canada. Since Canadian law will not allow periodic payments to be made out of an RRSP, C rolled the proceeds over into a Canadian registered retirement income fund A Registered Retirement Income Fund or RRIF is a tax-deferred retirement plan under Canadian tax law. Individuals use an RRIF to generate income from the savings accumulated under their Registered Retirement Savings Plan.  (RRIF RRIF Registered Retirement Income Fund
RRIF Regulation Reduction Incentive Fund (Australian government)
RRIF Registered Retirement Investment Fund (Canada) 
). The rollover A graphic element in an application or on a Web page that changes its color or shape when the pointer is moved (rolled) over it. See JavaScript rollover. See also n-key rollover.  is not a taxable event Taxable event

An event or transaction that has a tax consequence, such as the sale of stock holding that is subject to capital gains taxes.
 in Canada.

The U.S.-Canadian treaty provides that a beneficiary of an RRSP account may elect to defer U.S. income tax on the plan proceeds until such time as a distribution is made from the plan or any plan substituted for the plan. Therefore, the rollover from the RRSP to the RRIF is not currently taxable in the United States.

Example 6: Assume the same facts as in Example 4, except that C is a Canadian citizen who is residing in the United States. The result would be the same as in Example 4.

Example 7: D is a Canadian citizen who worked in Canada for a U.S. employer. After his separation from service from his U.S. employer, he receives a lump-sum distribution Lump-Sum Distribution

A one time payment for the entire amount due, rather than breaking payments into smaller installments. Some lump-sum distributions receive special tax treatment.
 from a qualified U.S. pension trust. This distribution relates to benefits earned for services performed in Canada.

D will not be subject to U.S. income tax on the distribution. Although the distribution is from a U.s. trust for services rendered in Canada, in accordance with the U.S.-Canadian income tax treaty, the distribution will be taxed only in Canada.

As the examples illustrate, there are many factors to be considered when planning for the cross-border payment of retirement benefits.
COPYRIGHT 1992 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1992, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Evans, Ginger G.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Feb 1, 1992
Words:682
Previous Article:Thrift NOL carrybacks may be in jeopardy. (net operating loss)
Next Article:New procedure for IRS informal technical advice.
Topics:



Related Articles
Retail sector battles out-shopping phenomenon. (Northern Ontario towns and cities adopt strategies to discourage consumers from making purchases on...
Cross-border shopping could affect tourism. (Canadians shopping in the U.S. paint a negative picture to Americans)
Border retailers advised to import inventory. (Canadian retailers) (Import Export Report)
Canadian RRSPs: U.S. tax considerations. (registered retirement savings plan)
U.S.-Canada social security benefits.(taxation)
U.S. and Canada seek to reduce border bottlenecks. (Security Beat).
"Manifest destiny". (Comment).
Challenge & response: after 9/11, the Detroit Regional Chamber leads the charge for a safe and efficient border between two great trading...
U.S. CITIZENS SOON WILL NEED PASSPORTS TO RETURN HOME.(News)
Wachovia subleases 1 NY Plaza.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles