Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,634,461 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. v. Stegman.


U.S. District Court

PROBATION -- REVOCATION

U.S. v. Stegman, 295 F.Supp.2d 542 (D.Md. 2003). The government filed a notice of violation of conditions of supervised release after an offender refused to comply with a probation officer's order to submit a blood specimen pursuant to the DNA Analysis DNA analysis Any technique used to analyze genes and DNA. See Chromosome walking, DNA fingerprinting, Footprinting, In situ hybridization, Jeffries' probe, Jumping libraries, PCR, RFLP analysis, Southern blot hybridization.  Backlog Elimination Act. The offender moved to dismiss the case and the district court denied the motion. The court held that the application of the Act did not violate the Ex Post Facto ex post facto adj. Latin for "after the fact," which refers to laws adopted after an act is committed making it illegal although it was legal when done, or increases the penalty for a crime after it is committed. Such laws are specifically prohibited by the U. S.  Clause, did not violate the Fourth Amendment, did not violate the separation of powers separation of powers: see Constitution of the United States.
separation of powers

Division of the legislative, executive, and judicial functions of government among separate and independent bodies.
 doctrine, and did not violate the offender's double jeopardy double jeopardy: see jeopardy.
double jeopardy

In law, the prosecution of a person for an offense for which he or she already has been prosecuted. In U.S.
 rights. (Maryland)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:violation of United States Constitution. 4th Amendment
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U5MD
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:109
Previous Article:Wirsching v. Colorado.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Next Article:U.S. v. Gementera.(mail theft offender appeals his sentence)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Gonzalez v. Litscher.(RELIGION)(Brief Article)
Ali v. District of Columbia.(violation of United States Constitution. 11th Amendment)
Terry Ex Rel. Terry v. Hill.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Jones v. Blanas.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)
Mladek v. Day.(prisoner abuse claim)(Brief Article)
Layman v. Alexander.(MEDICAL CARE)(Brief Article)
Mladek v. Day.(MEDICAL CARE)(Brief Article)
Habeas corpus.(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles