Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,652,131 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. v. Gementera.


U.S. Appeals Court

SUPERVISED RELEASE-CONDITIONS

U.S. v. Gementera, 379 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2004). An offender who pled guilty to mail theft was sentenced to supervised release and he appealed his sentence. The appeals court affirmed, finding that a supervised release condition that required the offender to spend a day standing outside a post office wearing a signboard sign·board  
n.
A board bearing a sign.


signboard
Noun

a board carrying a sign or notice, often to advertise a business or product

Noun 1.
 that stated "I stole mail. This is my punishment" was reasonably related to the legitimate statutory objective of rehabilitation rehabilitation: see physical therapy. . The court also held that the condition did not violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against the infliction in·flic·tion  
n.
1. The act or process of imposing or meting out something unpleasant.

2. Something, such as punishment, that is inflicted.

Noun 1.
 of cruel and unusual punishment Such punishment as would amount to torture or barbarity, any cruel and degrading punishment not known to the Common Law, or any fine, penalty, confinement, or treatment that is so disproportionate to the offense as to shock the moral sense of the community. . (Northern District of California)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:mail theft offender appeals his sentence
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U9CA
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:106
Previous Article:U.S. v. Stegman.(violation of United States Constitution. 4th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Next Article:U.S. v. Patrick V.(restitution)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
California Supreme Court throws three-strikes law a judicial curve.(Brief Article)
Researchers criticize cocaine sentencing guidelines.
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT ON TRIAL.
Three strikes and you're in for life: stealing so much as a slice of pizza can mean life in prison under a controversial law. Is it fair? The Supreme...
Stuck behind bars: mandatory minimum sentences are filling U.S. prisons: are they fair? Are they stopping crime?(USA)
U.S. appeals court: sentence.(Juveniles)(Brief Article)
Court report: states lose a few in this term's U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
The right decision on the juvenile death penalty.
Austin v. Johnson.(medical care cases)(Brief Article)
The dope dealer who got 55 years: even the judge called it cruel unusual and irrational.(Weldon Angelos)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles