Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,529,546 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. v. Faulkner.


U.S. District Court

TELEPHONE CALLS

U.S. v. Faulkner, 323 F.Supp.2d 1111 (D.Kan. 2004). Three detainees who were indicted INDICTED, practice. When a man is accused by a bill of indictment preferred by a grand jury, he is said to be indicted.  on charges of attempting to kill a government witness moved to suppress recordings of their jail telephone conversations. The court held that the detainees had impliedly consented to the recording of telephone conversations because notices that conversations might be recorded were posted throughout the facility, and a recorded warning was given before the commencement of long distance calls. The district court noted that the recordings made by employees of a private corrections company, were not covered not covered Health care adjective Referring to a procedure, test or other health service to which a policy holder or insurance beneficiary is not entitled under the terms of the policy or payment system–eg, Medicare. Cf Covered.  by the wiretapping A form of eavesdropping involving physical connection to the communications channels to breach the confidentiality of communications. For example, many poorly-secured buildings have unprotected telephone wiring closets where intruders may connect unauthorized wires to listen in on phone  exemption that was applicable when the interception was done by law enforcement officers. (Corrections Corporation of America Corrections Corporation of America (NYSE: CXW) (CCA) is a company that manages public prisons and other facilities[1], and has concessions for many others. The company had annual revenues in 2004 of $1.15 billion USD. , Leavenworth, Kansas)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:PRIVACY
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U4KS
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:121
Previous Article:Demery v. Arpaio.(violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Wirsching v. Colorado.(violation of equal protection)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Federal, state courts struggle with juror privacy.
PRIVACY DISCLOSURES: MAKE THEM COUNT.(Brief Article)
Privacy Legislation Introduced, Regs Put On Hold.(Brief Article)
The global reach of privacy invasion.
Tapping our wired lives: sovereignty doesn't just apply to nations. Taking a broader brush stroke, it also includes the privacy and identity of the...
Police need warrant to use global positioning system.(Washington)
U.S. v. Faulkner.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)
E-mail intercept violates wiretap law, First Circuit holds.
Hubbs v. Alamao.(Hubbs v. Alamao, 360 F.Supp.2d 1073)(Brief Article)
Hubbs v. Alamao.(PRIVACY)(violation of constitutional rights)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles