Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,529,472 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. v. Faulkner.


U.S. District Court

PRIVACY

TELEPHONE

U.S. v. Faulkner, 323 F.Supp.2d 1111 (D.Kan. 2004). Three detainees who were indicted INDICTED, practice. When a man is accused by a bill of indictment preferred by a grand jury, he is said to be indicted.  on charges of attempting to kill a government witness moved to suppress recordings of their jail telephone conversations. The court held that the detainees had impliedly consented to the recording of telephone conversations because notices that conversations might be recorded were posted throughout the facility, and a recorded warning was given before the commencement of long distance calls. The district court noted that the recordings made by employees of a private corrections company, were not covered not covered Health care adjective Referring to a procedure, test or other health service to which a policy holder or insurance beneficiary is not entitled under the terms of the policy or payment system–eg, Medicare. Cf Covered.  by the wiretapping A form of eavesdropping involving physical connection to the communications channels to breach the confidentiality of communications. For example, many poorly-secured buildings have unprotected telephone wiring closets where intruders may connect unauthorized wires to listen in on phone  exemption that was applicable when the interception was done by law enforcement officers. (Corrections Corporation of America Corrections Corporation of America (NYSE: CXW) (CCA) is a company that manages public prisons and other facilities[1], and has concessions for many others. The company had annual revenues in 2004 of $1.15 billion USD. , Leavenworth, Kansas)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:PRETRIAL DETENTION
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U4KS
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:121
Previous Article:U.S. v. Cooper.(due process of law)(Brief Article)
Next Article:U.S. v. Lopez.(pretrial confinement)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. v. Catalan-Roman.(administrative segregation)(Brief Article)
U.S. v. Catalan-Roman.(pretrial detention, prisoners challenges their placement in administrative segregation )(Brief Article)
Demery v. Arpaio.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)
U.S. v. Catalan-Roman.(solitary confinement)(Brief Article)
U.S. v. Johnson.(Brief Article)
Pretrial detention.(Alkire v. Irving)(Bozeman v. Orum)(Calderon-Ortiz v. Laboy-Alvarado)(Frye v. Pettis County Sheriff Dept)
Crow v. Montgomery.(Crow v. Montgomery, 403 F.3d 598 )(Brief Article)
Crow v. Montgomery.(Brief Article)
Crow v. Montgomery.(Crow v. Montgomery, 403 F.3d 598)(United States Constitution. 14th Amendment)(United States Constitution. 1st Amendment)(United...
Crow v. Montgomery.(SUPERVISION)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles