Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,598,536 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. appeals court RLUIPA -- Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act diet.


Madison v. Riter, 355 F.3d 310 (4th Cir. 2003). A state prisoner brought an action against prison officials and others under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, Pub.L. 106-274, 42 U.S.C.  2000cc-1 et seq. (RLUIPA) is a United States federal law that prohibits the imposition of burdens on the ability of prisoners to worship as they please, as well as making it easier  (RLUIPA RLUIPA Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 ), challenging denial of his requests for kosher meals. The district court found that the applicable section of RLUIPA violated the Establishment Clause and the prisoner appealed. The appeals court reversed and remanded, finding that the RLUIPA section did not violate the Establishment Clause. The court found that the statute had the legitimate secular purpose of minimizing governmental burdens on religious exercise, and did not impermissibly im·per·mis·si·ble  
adj.
Not permitted; not permissible: impermissible behavior.



im
 advance religion. (Virginia Department of Corrections The Virginia Department of Corrections (DOC) is the government agency responsible for operating prisons and correctional facilities for the US Commonwealth of Virginia. The agency is fully accredited by the American Correctional Association and is one of the oldest functioning )
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Religion
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2004
Words:102
Previous Article:U.S. appeals court: parole- due process parole- granting ex post facto.(Release)
Next Article:U.S. appeals court: opportunity to practice recognized religions.(Religion)
Topics:



Related Articles
Appeals court upholds religious liberty law for prisoners.(Around The States)(Brief Article)
Cutter v. Wilkinson.(violation of right to practice religion)(Brief Article)
Lindell v. McCallum.(violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)
Resnick v. Adams.(violation of Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993)(Brief Article)
Madison v. Riter.(FOOD)(Brief Article)
Madison v. Riter.(RELIGION)(Brief Article)
Benning v. Georgia.(violation of religious rights)(Brief Article)
Murphy v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections.(RELIGION)(Brief Article)
Religion.(Fenelon v. Riddle)(Marria v. Broaddus)(Murphy v. Carroll)
Lindell v. Casperson.(violation of Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles