Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,757,922 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. appeals court: prisoner on prisoner assault.


Berry v. Sherman, 365 F.3d 631 (8th Cir. 2004). An inmate who was attacked by his cellmate cell·mate  
n.
A person with whom one shares a cell, especially in a prison.
 brought a civil rights suit against correctional officers, alleging violation of his equal protection rights and failure to protect. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of all officers on the equal protection claim, but denied qualified immunity Qualified immunity is a doctrine in United States law providing immunity from suit to government officials performing discretionary functions when their action did not violate clearly established law. Qualified immunity was created by the U.S.  to certain officers for the failure to protect claim. The officers appealed and the appeals court reversed. The appeals court held that the inmate failed to show that officers knew of a substantial risk of harm to him as the result of his complaints about his cellmate's hygiene, and a report from another inmate that the cellmate had a knife. The court noted that officers searched the cell for the knife, and that the inmate repeatedly refused protective custody An arrangement whereby a person is safeguarded by law enforcement authorities in a location other than the person's home because his or her safety is seriously threatened. . (Northeast Correctional Center, Missouri Center is a city in Ralls County, Missouri, United States. The population was 644 at the 2000 census. Geography
Center is located at  (39.509267, -91.528566)GR1.
)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Failure to Protect
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2004
Words:140
Previous Article:U.S. district court: prisoner on prisoner assault; Ashford v. District of Columbia.(Failure to Protect)
Next Article:U.S. district court: officer on prisoner assault.(Failure to Protect)
Topics:



Related Articles
Hewes v. Magnusson.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(case regarding prisoner abuse)
Tucker v. Evans.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(case regarding prisoners abuse)(Brief Article)
Boyce v. Moore.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Palmer v. Marion County.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(deliberate indifference to safety)(Brief Article)
Johnson v. Johnson.(CIVIL RIGHTS)(Eighth Amendment and equal protection rights)(Brief Article)
Johnson v. Johnson.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(Brief Article)
Pierson v. Hartley.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(Brief Article)
Whiting v. Marathon County Sheriff's Dept.(FEMALE PRISONERS)(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Conditions of confinement.
Failure to protect.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles