Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,380,416 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. appeals court: opportunity to practice recognized religions.


Goff v. Graves, 362 F.3d 543 (8th Cir. 2004). State inmates brought a [section] 1983 action, alleging violation of their First Amendment rights because prison officials refused to permit inmates in lockup See hang and abend.  to receive food trays that were prepared for a banquet for inmates who were members of the prisoner-founded "CONS" religion. The district court ordered prison officials to permit CONS inmates in lockup to receive trays of banquet food. The officials appealed and the appeals court affirmed in part and reversed in part. The appeals court held that the officials did not violate the inmates' First Amendment right by denying the banquet trays to CONS inmates in lockup, and that the ban on delivering banquet food trays was reasonably related to legitimate penological pe·nol·o·gy also poe·nol·o·gy  
n.
The study, theory, and practice of prison management and criminal rehabilitation.



[Latin poena, penalty (from Greek
 interests. The appeals court denied the officials' request for declaratory judgment declaratory judgment

In law, a judgment merely declaring a right or establishing the legal status or interpretation of a law or instrument. It is binding but is distinguished from other judgments or court opinions in that it includes no executive element (an order that
 that would allow them to prevent inmates to participating in CONS activities, noting that an appeals court had held that CONS was a religion that was entitled en·ti·tle  
tr.v. en·ti·tled, en·ti·tling, en·ti·tles
1. To give a name or title to.

2. To furnish with a right or claim to something:
 to First Amendment protection. (Iowa State Penitentiary The Iowa State Penitentiary (ISP) is a maximum security prison for men located in the Lee County, Iowa community of Fort Madison. In Iowa the prison is known colloquially as Fort Madison and is usually referred to as such by people in the state. )
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Religion
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2004
Words:170
Previous Article:U.S. appeals court RLUIPA -- Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act diet.(Religion)
Next Article:U.S. appeals court: diet.(Religion)
Topics:



Related Articles
Fraise v. Terhune.(CLASSIFICATION & SEPARATION)(Brief Article)
Fraise v. Terhune.(violation of free exercise or equal protection rights)(Brief Article)
Wyatt v. Terhune.(RELIGION)(violation of religious and equal protection rights)(Brief Article)
Wyatt v. Terhune.(violation of constitutional rights)(Brief Article)
Fraise v. Terhune.(violation of prisoners' rights)(Brief Article)
Kind v. Frank.(freedom of religion)(Brief Article)
Ford v. McGinnis.(RELIGION)(infringement of religious rights)(Brief Article)
Adkins v. Kaspar.(RELIGION)(Brief Article)
Freeman v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice.(RELIGION)(Brief Article)
Religion.(Fenelon v. Riddle)(Marria v. Broaddus)(Murphy v. Carroll)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles