Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,505,210 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. appeals court: PLRA--Prison Litigation Reform Act.


McEachin v. McGuinnis, 357 F.3d 197 (2nd Cir. 2004). A prisoner, proceeding in forma pauperis [Latin, In the character or manner of a pauper.] A phrase that indicates the permission given by a court to an indigent to initiate a legal action without having to pay for court fees or costs due to his or her lack of financial resources. , brought a civil rights complaint against prison officials. The district court dismissed the action under the screening provisions of the Prison Litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
 Reform Act (PLRA PLRA Partido Liberal Radical Autentico (Paraguay)
PLRA Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995
). The prisoner appealed, and the appeals court affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded. The court held that the screening provisions of PLRA did not warrant sua sponte dismissal of free exercise claims involving the prisoner's placement on a restricted diet as a disciplinary measure, which deprived him of blessed food for his Ramadan observance. The inmate also alleged that the disciplinary action was the product of religious discrimination, because an officer issued an order that he knew the prisoner would not obey until after he finished his prayer. (Southport Correctional Facility The Southport Correctional Facility is an ultra-maximum-security, or "supermax," prison in New York State, USA. It is located in the town of Southport, New York, in upstate Chemung County. , New York)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Access to Courts
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2004
Words:136
Previous Article:U.S. appeals court: legal materials other state.(Access to Courts)
Next Article:U.S. appeals court: pro se litigation 42 U.S.C.A. sec. 1983.(Access to Courts)
Topics:



Related Articles
Goldsmith v. White.(prisoner brought civil rights action)
Kozohorsky v. Harmon.(ACCESS TO COURTS)(Brief Article)
Ferrington v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections.(exhaustion of state remedies)(Brief Article)
Armstrong v. Davis.(ATTORNEY FEES)(Brief Article)
Chandler v. Crosby.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Deleon v. Doe.(violation of constitutional rights)(Brief Article)
Giano v. Goord.(violation of privacy rights)(Brief Article)
Witzke v. Femal.(deliberate indifference to medical needs)(Brief Article)
Riley v. Kurtz.(violation of prisoners rights)(Brief Article)
Witzke v. Femal.(GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES, PRISONER)(violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles