Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,506,614 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. appeals court: DNA; Groceman v. U.S. Dept. of Justice.


Groceman v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 354 F.3d 411 (5th Cir. 2004). Prisoners convicted of armed robberies sought to enjoin federal entities from collecting and retaining samples of their DNA DNA: see nucleic acid.
DNA
 or deoxyribonucleic acid

One of two types of nucleic acid (the other is RNA); a complex organic compound found in all living cells and many viruses. It is the chemical substance of genes.
 under the provisions of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act. The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim Within a judicial forum, the failure to present sufficient facts which, if taken as true, would indicate that any violation of law occurred or that the claimant is entitled to a legal remedy.

Failure to state a claim is frequently raised as a defense in civil litigation.
 and the prisoners appealed. The appeals court affirmed, finding that persons incarcerated incarcerated /in·car·cer·at·ed/ (in-kahr´ser-at?ed) imprisoned; constricted; subjected to incarceration.

in·car·cer·at·ed
adj.
Confined or trapped, as a hernia.
 after conviction retain no constitutional privacy interest against their correct identification. The court found the DNA Act to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. (United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (N.D. Tex.) is a United States district court. Its first judge, Andrew Phelps McCormick, was appointed to the court on April 10, 1879. The court convenes in Dallas, Texas. )
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Searches
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2004
Words:100
Previous Article:U.S. appeals court: DNA; Green v. Berge.(Searches)
Next Article:U.S. appeals court: strip search.(Searches)
Topics:



Related Articles
Through the legal looking glass. (Up front: news and opinion from independent minds).(Column)
Court draws line on taking DNA.(Courts)(Oregon authorities study the federal appellate ruling to see whether it will affect collection of samples...
Maydak v. U.S. Dept. of Justice.(ADMINISTRATION)(Department of Justice)(case regarding exempt from disclosure)(Brief Article)
Maydak v. U.S. Dept. of Justice.(FREE SPEECH, EXPRESSION, ASSOCIATION)(Brief Article)
Maydak v. U.S. Dept. of Justice.(prisoner release)(Brief Article)
Vore v. U.S. Dept. of Justice.(Department of Justice's violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)
Burleson v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice.(MEDICAL CARE)(Brief Article)
Burleson v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice.(violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)
Freeman v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice.(prisoner alleges justice department of violation of Free Exercise and Equal Protection Clauses)(Brief...
Freeman v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice.(RELIGION)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles