Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,669,765 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. Supreme Court: EARLY RELEASE.


Lopez v. Davis 121 S.Ct. 714(2001). A federal prisoner convicted of possession with the intent to distribute methamphetamine petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus Noun 1. writ of habeas corpus - a writ ordering a prisoner to be brought before a judge
habeas corpus

judicial writ, writ - (law) a legal document issued by a court or judicial officer
 challenging a federal Bureau of Prisons Noun 1. Federal Bureau of Prisons - the law enforcement agency of the Justice Department that operates a nationwide system of prisons and detention facilities to incarcerate inmates sentenced to imprisonment for federal crimes
BoP
 (BOP) regulation. The regulation categorically denied early release to prisoners, based on completion of a drug treatment program, if a prisoner's current offense was a felony attended by the carrying, possession or use of a firearm. The district court granted the petition and the appeals court reversed. The United States Supreme Court United States Supreme Court: see Supreme Court, United States.  held that the BOP had the discretion, under the governing federal statute, to promulgate To officially announce, to publish, to make known to the public; to formally announce a statute or a decision by a court.  a regulation that categorically denies early release to prisoners whose felonies involved the use of a firearm. The court noted that the statute provided that the BOP "may" reduce the sentence of a nonviolent offender who has successfully completed a drug treatment program, and the statute did not limit the considerations the BOP could use to guide its decisions, and the BOP was not require d to make only individualized in·di·vid·u·al·ize  
tr.v. in·di·vid·u·al·ized, in·di·vid·u·al·iz·ing, in·di·vid·u·al·iz·es
1. To give individuality to.

2. To consider or treat individually; particularize.

3.
 determinations or to consider only postconviction conduct. (Federal Bureau of Prisons)
COPYRIGHT 2001 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:prisoners and prisons
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2001
Words:180
Previous Article:U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE-CONDITIONS PAROLE-REVOCATION GOOD TIME.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
Next Article:U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE-REVOCATION PAROLE-DUE PROCESS.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: EX POST FACTO.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: PLRA-Prison Litigation Reform Act Limitation.
U.S. Supreme Court: RELEASE DATE.
U.S. Supreme Court: ALCOHOL/DRUGS.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: RFRA- Religious Freedom Restoration Act VISITS.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
Failure to protect.
Medical care.(Brief Article)
Mental problems (prisoner).(Brief Article)
Doty v. Doyle.(ADMINISTRATION)(Brief Article)
Habeas corpus.(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles