Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,474,281 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. District Court: WORKING CONDITIONS.


Abarca v. Chevron U.S.A. 75 F.Supp.2d 566 (E.D.Tex. 1999). Prison employees and prison inmates, more than 1,000 total, sued the owner and operator of a pipeline and contractors who sold, installed and maintained the pipeline's valves, alleging assault, negligence, gross negligence gross negligence n. carelessness in reckless disregard for the safety or lives of others, which is so great it appears to be a conscious violation of other people's rights to safety. It is more than simple inadvertence, but it is just shy of being intentionally evil. If one has borrowed or contracted to take care of another's property, then gross negligence is the failure to actively take the care one would of his/her own property., strict products liability, and cruel and unusual punishment arising out of a pipeline leak near the prison. The plaintiffs were forcibly exposed to gas when they were unable to be evacuated and the inmates were confined to their cells. The district court found that there was no federal question Federal question n. one basis for filing a lawsuit in federal district court is that it is based on subjects enumerated in the U. S. Constitution or when a federal statute is involved. Thus, existence of such federal question gives the federal court jurisdiction. for which federal jurisdiction existed, dismissed the case. (Texas Department of Corrections, Liberty County, Texas)
COPYRIGHT 2000 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 1, 2000
Words:112
Previous Article:U.S. Appeals Court: INVOLUNTARY MEDICATION PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS DUE PROCESS.
Next Article:U.S. Appeals Court: SUICIDE.
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: SUPERVISED RELEASE.(Brief Article)
3. Administrative segregation.
7. Civil rights.
8. Classification & separation.
15. Facilities.
27. Liability.
29. Medical care.
43. Sentence.
U.S. v. Flores.(prisoner files a writ of habeas corpus challenging restrictions on his confinement)(Brief Article)
U.S. v. Flores.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles