Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,693,900 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. District Court: SEX OFFENDER.


Doe v. Lee, 132 F.Supp.2d 57 (D.Conn. 2001). A purportedly non-dangerous sex offender sex offender n. generic term for all persons convicted of crimes involving sex, including rape, molestation, sexual harassment and pornography production or distribution.  brought due process and ex post facto ex post facto adj. Latin for "after the fact," which refers to laws adopted after an act is committed making it illegal although it was legal when done, or increases the penalty for a crime after it is committed. Such laws are specifically prohibited by the U. S.  challenges to the Connecticut Sex Offender Registry Act. The district court held that the act violated due process since it provided no procedure to be heard prior to infringing on a non-dangerous offender's liberty interest. The court also found that the act did not have a punitive purpose and was not so punitive in fact that it violates the ex post facto clause. The act provided for Internet dissemination dissemination Medtalk The spread of a pernicious process–eg, CA, acute infection Oncology Metastasis, see there  of registrant An individual or organization that signs up (registers) for a training class or service. See domain name registrar.  profiles, without differentiating between dangerous and non-dangerous offenders. (Connecticut Sex Offender Registry Act)
COPYRIGHT 2001 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2001
Words:107
Previous Article:U.S. Appeals Court: OUTDOOR EXERCISE.(Brief Article)
Next Article:U.S. Supreme Court: SEX OFFENDER.(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: EX POST FACTO SEX OFFENDER.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court: SEX OFFENDER.(Brief Article)
U.S. appeals court sex offenders. (Ex-Offenders).(Brief Article)
U.S. appeals court sex offenders ex post facto. (Release).(Brief Article)
West v. Macht.(MENTAL PROBLEMS (PRISONER))(Brief Article)
Ainsworth v. Stanley.(PROGRAMS-PRISONER)(Brief Article)
Hatton v. Bonner.(sex offender petitioned for habeas corpus relief)(Brief Article)
Kritenbrink v. Crawford.(classification of sex offenders)(Brief Article)
Kritenbrink v. Crawford.(inmates alleges state of failure to provide no adequate due process procedures)(Brief Article)
Pelland v. Rhode Island.(law enforcement policy curtails right of sex offenders' interstate travel)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles