U.S. District Court: ITEMS PERMITTED.
Ballance v. Virginia, 130 F.Supp.2d 754 (W.D.Va. 2000). A state
prison inmate who was convicted of sexual crimes involving juveniles
brought a [sections] 1983 action against corrections officials alleging
wrongful confiscation of photographs of children from his cell. The
district court held that the confiscation complied with the First
Amendment even though only a small percentage of photographs were of
seminude children. The court noted that state officials provided minimum
procedural safeguards, including notice of confiscation, provision of
avenues for protest, and review of the prisoner's allegation of a
First Amendment violation by someone who was not involved with the
confiscation. The court found that the confiscation of all photographs
served to further the prison's interests in both rehabilitation and
institutional security because the possible discovery of the cache of
photos by other prisoners created a potential for disturbance. According
to the court, a prisoner has no Fourth Amendment right to be free from
unreasonable searches of his cell because he has no expectation of
privacy in his cell. (Wallens Ridge State Prison, Virginia)
COPYRIGHT 2001 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
|
Reader Opinion