Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,678,926 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. District Court: CO-PAYMENT.


Beerheide v. Suthers, 82 F.Supp.2d 1190 (D.Colo. 2000). Three state prisoners one in confinement, or under arrest, for a political offense.

See also: State
 who were Orthodox Jews brought a [sections] 1983 action against state prison employees for failing to provide them with kosher kosher [Heb.,=proper, i.e., fit for use], in Judaism, term used in rabbinic literature to mean what is ritually correct, but most widely applied to food that is in accordance with dietary laws based on Old Testament passages (primarily Lev. 11 and Deut. 14).  meals. The district court granted a permanent injunction permanent injunction n. a final order of a court that a person or entity refrain from certain activities permanently or take certain actions (usually to correct a nuisance) until completed.  against a proposed prison co-payment program that would have required the prisoners to pay 25 percent of the cost of their kosher diet. The court found that the proposed co-pay policy would place an unnecessary burden on the prisoners' First Amendment right to free exercise of religion. The court held that the state prison's budgetary considerations and its goal of preventing inmate INMATE. One who dwells in a part of another's house, the latter dwelling, at the same time, in the said house. Kitch. 45, b; Com. Dig. Justices of the Peace, B 85; 1 B. & Cr. 578; 8 E. C. L. R. 153; 2 Dowl. & Ry. 743; 8 B. & Cr. 71; 15 E. C. L. R. 154; 2 Man. & Ry. 227; 9 B. & Cr.  abuse of religious diets were not rationally related to the proposed co-pay program and that the Jewish inmates did not have a viable alternative for observing a kosher diet. The court concluded that the cost of providing kosher meals had a de minimis An abbreviated form of the Latin Maxim de minimis non curat lex, "the law cares not for small things." A legal doctrine by which a court refuses to consider trifling matters.  effect on the prison's food service budget. Prison officials had testified that the cost of a kosher meal is between $2.50 a nd $4.50 and that the co-pay program would have required the prisoners to pay approximately $90 per month. (Colorado Department of Corrections)
COPYRIGHT 2000 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2000
Words:193
Previous Article:U.S. Appeals Court: DUE PROCESS.(Brief Article)
Next Article:U.S. District Court: RESTITUTION.(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Federal court assumes ERISA claims jurisdiction. (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) (column)
Antitrust concerns in managed care provider negotiations. (Health Law)
Credit card system solves problem of collecting on co-payments.(Special Report: Hospital Prognosis)
Bail.(prisoner litigation)(Brief Article)
Services- prisoner.(Brief Article)
4. Assessment of costs.
Singleton v. Norris.(CIVIL RIGHTS)(Brief Article)
Singleton v. Norris.(habeas corpus petition)(Brief Article)
Singleton v. Norris.(MEDICAL CARE)(Brief Article)
Singleton v. Norris.(MENTAL PROBLEMS (PRISONER))(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles