U.S. District Court: CO-PAYMENT.Beerheide v. Suthers, 82 F.Supp.2d 1190 (D.Colo. 2000). Three state prisoners one in confinement, or under arrest, for a political offense. See also: State who were Orthodox Jews brought a [sections] 1983 action against state prison employees for failing to provide them with kosher kosher [Heb.,=proper, i.e., fit for use], in Judaism, term used in rabbinic literature to mean what is ritually correct, but most widely applied to food that is in accordance with dietary laws based on Old Testament passages (primarily Lev. 11 and Deut. 14). meals. The district court granted a permanent injunction permanent injunction n. a final order of a court that a person or entity refrain from certain activities permanently or take certain actions (usually to correct a nuisance) until completed. against a proposed prison co-payment program that would have required the prisoners to pay 25 percent of the cost of their kosher diet. The court found that the proposed co-pay policy would place an unnecessary burden on the prisoners' First Amendment right to free exercise of religion. The court held that the state prison's budgetary considerations and its goal of preventing inmate INMATE. One who dwells in a part of another's house, the latter dwelling, at the same time, in the said house. Kitch. 45, b; Com. Dig. Justices of the Peace, B 85; 1 B. & Cr. 578; 8 E. C. L. R. 153; 2 Dowl. & Ry. 743; 8 B. & Cr. 71; 15 E. C. L. R. 154; 2 Man. & Ry. 227; 9 B. & Cr. abuse of religious diets were not rationally related to the proposed co-pay program and that the Jewish inmates did not have a viable alternative for observing a kosher diet. The court concluded that the cost of providing kosher meals had a de minimis An abbreviated form of the Latin Maxim de minimis non curat lex, "the law cares not for small things." A legal doctrine by which a court refuses to consider trifling matters. effect on the prison's food service budget. Prison officials had testified that the cost of a kosher meal is between $2.50 a nd $4.50 and that the co-pay program would have required the prisoners to pay approximately $90 per month. (Colorado Department of Corrections) |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion