Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,599,499 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. District Court: ADA - Americans with Disabilities Act DISCRIMINATION.


Yeskey v. Pennsylvania, 76 F.Supp.2d 572 (M.D.Pa. 1999). A prisoner sued a state and prison officials alleging that their denial of his admission to a boot camp Software from Apple that enables an Intel x86-based Macintosh to host the Windows XP operating system. Boot Camp is used to divide the hard disk into Windows and Mac partitions, to install the necessary drivers and to create a dual boot environment.  program, allegedly due to his high blood pressure, violated the Americans with Disabilities Act Americans with Disabilities Act, U.S. civil-rights law, enacted 1990, that forbids discrimination of various sorts against persons with physical or mental handicaps.  (ADA Ada, city, United States
Ada (ā`ə), city (1990 pop. 15,820), seat of Pontotoc co., S central Okla.; inc. 1904. It is a large cattle market and the center of a rich oil and ranch area.
). The case was eventually considered by the United States Supreme Court United States Supreme Court: see Supreme Court, United States.  which ruled that ADA applied to state prisons. The case was remanded to the district court which held that the individual defendants in the case could not be held liable for discrimination in furnishing public services. The district court also held that the prisoner failed to show that he was "disabled" as required to support an ADA claim. The court found that intense exercise, which was part of the boot camp program, was not a "major life activity" which was required to be accommodated under ADA. (Pennsylvania Motivational Boot Camp Act)
COPYRIGHT 2000 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2000
Words:148
Previous Article:U.S. Appeals Court: FAILURE TO PROTECT USE OF FORCE.(Brief Article)
Next Article:U.S. Appeals Court: SEX OFFENDERS DUE PROCESS.(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
ADA suits barred by application for disability benefits. (Americans with Disabilities Act)
Mental health ruling could affect the way insurance does business.(Brief Article)
Employees lose most ADA suits, study shows. (Americans with Disabilities Act)
Case involving impotence tests bounds of the ADA.
U.S. Appeals Court: ADA-Americans with Disabilities Act: DISCRIMINATION.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: DELIBERATE INDIFF. ADA-Americans with Disabilities Act: MEDICATION.
U.S. Appeals Court: MEDICAL CARE.(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court: ALTERNATIVES TO CONFINEMENT.(Brief Article)
Garrett footnote allows ADA injunctive relief for state workers, Eighth Circuit rules.
Tenth Circuit blocks attempt to narrow Rehabilitation Act in disability cases.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles