Printer Friendly

U.S. District Court: SEX OFFENDER.

Doe v. Lee. 132 F.Supp.2d 57 (D.Conn. 2001). A purportedly non-dangerous sex offender brought due process and ex post facto challenges to the Connecticut Sex Offender Registry Act. The district court held that the act violated due process since it provided no procedure to be heard prior to infringing on a non-dangerous offender's liberty interest. The court also found that the act did not have a punitive purpose and was not so punitive in fact that it violates the ex post facto clause. The act provided for Internet dissemination of registrant profiles, without differentiating between dangerous and non-dangerous offenders. (Connecticut Sex Offender Registry Act)
COPYRIGHT 2001 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2001
Words:107
Previous Article:U.S. District Court: MAIL RIGHT OF PRIVACY.
Next Article:U.S. District Court: SEX OFFENDERS.
Topics:


Related Articles
[0] U.S. Appeals Court: SEX OFFENDER.
[1] U.S. Appeals Court: SEX OFFENDER.
U.S. District Court: SEX OFFENDER.
U.S. District Court: TRANSFERS PRIVACY.
U.S. District Court: SEX OFFENDER.
U.S. appeals court sex offenders ex post facto. (Release).
West v. Macht.
Ainsworth v. Stanley.
Kritenbrink v. Crawford.
Kritenbrink v. Crawford.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters