Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,552,896 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. Appeals Court: RETALIATION OTHER STATE.


Rouse v. Benson, 193 F.3d 936 (8th Cir. 1999). A state prisoner one in confinement, or under arrest, for a political offense.

See also: State
 brought a civil rights action against prison officials alleging that his transfer from one prison to another was in retaliation RETALIATION. The act by which a nation or individual treats another in the same manner that the latter has treated them. For example, if a nation should lay a very heavy tariff on American goods, the United States would be justified in return in laying heavy duties on the manufactures and  for his exercise exercise of his Native American religion and violated vi·o·late  
tr.v. vi·o·lat·ed, vi·o·lat·ing, vi·o·lates
1. To break or disregard (a law or promise, for example).

2. To assault (a person) sexually.

3.
 his equal protection rights. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of upon the side of; favorable to; for the advantage of.

See also: favor
 the officials and the prisoner appealed. The appeals court reversed and remanded, finding that fact issues as to whether the transfer was in retaliation for exercise of a First Amendment activity precluded summary judgment. The prisoner had been convicted and incarcerated incarcerated /in·car·cer·at·ed/ (in-kahr´ser-at?ed) imprisoned; constricted; subjected to incarceration.

in·car·cer·at·ed
adj.
Confined or trapped, as a hernia.
 in Iowa but was transferred at his request to a state prison in Minnesota where he hoped to have greater opportunities to practice his Native American religion, specifically the practices of Lakota. While incarcerated in Minnesota he complained about various religious restrictions and filed several grievances. He was returned to Iowa and alleged that his transfer was in retaliation for his grievances and his efforts to practice his religion. (Minnesota Correctional Facility, Stillwater)
COPYRIGHT 2000 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 1, 2000
Words:171
Previous Article:U.S. Appeals Court: OTHER STATE CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT.(Brief Article)
Next Article:U.S. District Court: RESTRAINTS.(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: OPPORTUNITY TO PRACTICE.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: WORK.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: DISCIPLINE REMOVAL FROM JOB.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: RETALIATION FOR LEGAL ACTION.(Brief Article)
Grievance procedures, prisoner.(prisoner litigation)(Brief Article)
Personnel.(Brief Article)
Bell v. Johnson.(ACCESS TO COURT)(Brief Article)
Morales v. Mackalm.(retaliation claim)(Brief Article)
McElroy v. Lopac.(FREE SPEECH, EXPRESSION, AND ASSOCIATION)(Brief Article)
McElroy v. Lopac.(McElroy v. Lopac, 403 F.3d 855 )(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles