Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,763,846 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE.


Maddox v. Elzie. 238 F.3d 437 (D.C.Cir. 2001). After his parole was revoked and he was reincarcerated, a prisoner sought a writ of habeas corpus Noun 1. writ of habeas corpus - a writ ordering a prisoner to be brought before a judge
habeas corpus

judicial writ, writ - (law) a legal document issued by a court or judicial officer
 challenging the parole boards decision. The district court granted the petition in part and the parole board appealed. The appeals court reversed, finding that the parole boards ex parte [Latin, On one side only.] Done by, for, or on the application of one party alone.

An ex parte judicial proceeding is conducted for the benefit of only one party.
 meeting with a trial prosecutor did not deprive the prisoner of due process and did not give rise to a presumption of vindictiveness on the part of the prosecutor. The court noted that the meeting with the prosecutor was inappropriate, but that the prisoner had not been deprived of due process in that he had the opportunity to present his full case to the board, was represented by counsel at the revocation The recall of some power or authority that has been granted.

Revocation by the act of a party is intentional and voluntary, such as when a person cancels a Power of Attorney that he has given or a will that he has written.
 hearing, and the board had sufficient evidence to justify revocation. (District of Columbia District of Columbia, federal district (2000 pop. 572,059, a 5.7% decrease in population since the 1990 census), 69 sq mi (179 sq km), on the east bank of the Potomac River, coextensive with the city of Washington, D.C. (the capital of the United States).  Board of Parole)
COPYRIGHT 2001 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2001
Words:145
Previous Article:U.S. Supreme Court: RELEASE DATE.
Next Article:U.S. Appeals Court: ALIEN.(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE SENTENCE.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE-REVOCATION.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE REVOCATION EQUAL PROTECTION.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE RELEASE DATE.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: SELF INCRIMINATION RIGHT TO COUNSEL.
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE SELF-INCRIMINATION.
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE-HEARING PAROLE-DUE PROCESS PAROLE-REVOCATION.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE-REVOCATION GOOD TIME.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE-CONDITIONS PAROLE-REVOCATION GOOD TIME.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
Good time.(prisoner litigation)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles