Printer Friendly
The Free Library
21,435,892 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S. Appeals Court: SEX OFFENDERS DUE PROCESS.

Chambers v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections, 205 F.3d 1237 (10th Cir. 2000). An inmate INMATE. One who dwells in a part of another's house, the latter dwelling, at the same time, in the said house. Kitch. 45, b; Com. Dig. Justices of the Peace, B 85; 1 B. & Cr. 578; 8 E. C. L. R. 153; 2 Dowl. & Ry. 743; 8 B. & Cr. 71; 15 E. C. L. R. 154; 2 Man. & Ry. 227; 9 B. & Cr.  challenged his classification as a sex offender sex offender n. generic term for all persons convicted of crimes involving sex, including rape, molestation, sexual harassment and pornography production or distribution.  by a state corrections department and the district court granted summary judgment to the department. The appeals court affirmed in part and reversed in part. The appeals court held that the requirement that the offender participate in a sex offender treatment program was not an ex post facto ex post facto adj. Latin for "after the fact," which refers to laws adopted after an act is committed making it illegal although it was legal when done, or increases the penalty for a crime after it is committed. Such laws are specifically prohibited by the U. S.  violation, but that the inmate had a procedural due process right to a hearing before being classified as a sex offender. According to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the court, the inmate had a protected liberty interest in not being labeled as a sex offender. (Colorado Department of Corrections. Sex Offender Treatment Program)
COPYRIGHT 2000 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2000
Words:118
Previous Article:U.S. District Court: ADA - Americans with Disabilities Act DISCRIMINATION.
Next Article:U.S. District Court: CUSTODY LEVEL TRANSFER.
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. District Court: SEX OFFENDERS.
U.S. Appeals Court: DUE PROCESS.
U.S. Appeals Court: SEX OFFENDER RIGHT TO TREATMENT DUE PROCESS EQUAL PROTECTION ADA- Americans with Disabilities Act.
Wirsching v. Colorado.
Wirsching v. Colorado.
West v. Schwebke.
Hatton v. Bonner.
West v. Schwebke.
Kritenbrink v. Crawford.
Kritenbrink v. Crawford.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2013 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles