U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE REVOCATION EQUAL PROTECTION.
Noble v. U.S. Parole Com'n, 194 F.3d 152 (D.C. Cir. 1999). A prisoner sought a writ of habeas corpus claiming that he was entitled to credit for time spent on parole after his parole was revoked. The district court denied the writ and the appeals court affirmed. The appeals court held that the United States Parole Commission did not violate the prisoner's rights by refusing to credit the prisoner for time spent on parole. (District of Columbia)
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Corrections Caselaw Quarterly|
|Article Type:||Brief Article|
|Date:||Feb 1, 2000|
|Previous Article:||U.S. District Court: PAROLE-GRANTING.|
|Next Article:||U.S. District Court: LIBERTY INTEREST WORK RELEASE.|