Printer Friendly

U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE REVOCATION EQUAL PROTECTION.

Noble v. U.S. Parole Com'n, 194 F.3d 152 (D.C. Cir. 1999). A prisoner sought a writ of habeas corpus claiming that he was entitled to credit for time spent on parole after his parole was revoked. The district court denied the writ and the appeals court affirmed. The appeals court held that the United States Parole Commission did not violate the prisoner's rights by refusing to credit the prisoner for time spent on parole. (District of Columbia)
COPYRIGHT 2000 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 1, 2000
Words:80
Previous Article:U.S. District Court: PAROLE-GRANTING.
Next Article:U.S. District Court: LIBERTY INTEREST WORK RELEASE.
Topics:


Related Articles
U.S. District Court: COST OF CONFINEMENT.
U.S. District Court: REVOCATION.
U.S. District Court: PAROLE.
U.S. District Court: PAROLE-REVOCATION PAROLE-DUE PROCESS EQUAL PROTECTION.
U.S. district court parole. (Habeas Corpus).
U.S. district court parole-revocation. (Release).
Habeas corpus.
Alexander v. Johnson.
Gant v. Reilly.
Ash v. Reilly.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters