Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,552,896 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

U.S., China, chart courses on new crises


National interests make strange bedfellows. There could be no better example than the warming relationship between the United States and China, two old antagonists.

If North Korea, indeed, has agreed finally to get on a pathway to nuclear disarmament, a cherished Bush administration goal, China can take a bow for diplomatic success. It took the lead in diplomacy with Pyongyang.

More quietly, China has intensified its pressure on Iran to halt enrichment of uranium, another prime U.S. foreign policy goal.

And as a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, China probably will be at the table in Baghdad around March 10 when Iraq hosts a regional meeting seeking stability.

The meeting will be significant for bringing together American, Iranian and Syrian diplomats, a reversal in the Bush administration's shunning of Tehran and Damascus.

Reflecting on the breakthrough Feb. 13 decision by North Korea to dismantle its principal reactor in exchange for fuel, U.S. negotiator Christopher Hill paid high tribute to China this week in Congress.

"We really have lined up our interests with them," Hill said, citing especially the goal of denuclearization of the Korean peninsula.

For one thing, Hill said, China wants "clarity" from North Korea on abandoning its nuclear weapons program.

That's a diplomatic way of saying China is taking on the task of making sure North Korea does not slip out of what appears to be a firm commitment.

On the other hot nuclear front, China used a visit Thursday to Beijing by Iran's deputy foreign minister Abbas Araghchi to urge Iran to cease uranium enrichment as demanded by the U.N. Security Council.

If Iran continues to defy the council, claiming its enrichment is not part of a weapons program, the Bush administration is likely to propose economic sanctions against Tehran.

China's cooperation would be vital. It has the power to veto any council resolution, but could hold its nose, abstain, and not block punishment.

Its expected participation in a meeting of U.S., European, Russian, Iranian and Syrian ambassadors in Baghdad and then a follow-up foreign ministers meeting in April is most intriguing.

It extends China's reach diplomatically, and opens a door to wider cooperation with the Bush administration as it seeks a solution to the bloody insurgency in Iraq.

There will be much to talk about when Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte flies to Beijing on Saturday for two days of meetings as part of an Asia trip.

Describing China as a hypothetical adversary that helps the Pentagon justify its budget requests, James Dobbins, senior security analyst at the Rand Corp., said, "When we find a real adversary like North Korea or al-Qaida, China becomes an ally and not an adversary."

And, Dobbins said in an interview, "We are in a phase now where we have real enemies. We don't have to make up hypothetical ones."

Old China hands cautioned Thursday, however, against going overboard.

James R. Lilley, a Reagan-era ambassador to China and South Korea, cautioned that "the relationship with China goes up and goes down" historically.

"It is not tranquil or stable," he said in a telephone interview. "There are differences but also complementary interests."

On the down side currently, Lilley cited accusations of Chinese currency manipulation and copyright infringements.

Michael Green, an adviser to the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a Georgetown University professor, credited China with being more helpful with North Korea and Iran. "And building on that cooperation is important," Green said in an interview.

However, he said, China also is backsliding on human rights and religious freedom and is taking provocative moves to build up its military capabilities, including recent anti-satellite tests.

"So the administration will have to be careful not to boil U.S.-China relations down to one or two areas of cooperation, no matter how important they are," said Green, who headed the Asia desk at the National Security Council for the Bush administration until the end of 2005.

And Jeffrey Bader, director of the Thornton China Center at the Brookings Institution, said China is focused on economic development and for that it needs a peaceful international environment.

"The key is a good relationship with the United States, and they realize they cannot challenge the United States for a generation or more, if they were inclined to do so," the former Clinton and Bush administration official said in a separate interview.

China is acting consistently with its national interests, Bader said. "I would not call it a new day dawning. I would call it logical steps in their national security interest."

___

EDITOR'S NOTE _ Barry Schweid has covered diplomacy for The Associated Press since 1973.

Copyright 2007 AP News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright (c) Mochila, Inc.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:BARRY SCHWEID
Publication:AP News
Date:Mar 2, 2007
Words:771
Previous Article:Leafs eliminate Canadiens to stay alive
Next Article:Analysis: GOP's 2008 field still fluid



Related Articles
China's New Political Economy: The Giant Awakes.
WEDNESDAY IN ATLANTA : TODAY'S BEST BETS.(SPORTS)
New Directions in the Study of China's Foreign Policy.
China to release anti-satellite report
Ex-French official picked to head IMF
Gore: Next US leader to work on climate
Asia-Pacific's economy likely to slow

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles