Typhoid vaccine declared a success.Typhoid vaccine declared a success Taking a different approach to making vaccines against typhoid fever typhoid fever acute, generalized infection caused by Salmonella typhi. The main sources of infection are contaminated water or milk and, especially in urban communities, food handlers who are carriers. has produced a winner, scientists announced last week. Researchers at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHHD NICHHD National Institute of Child Health and Human Development ) in Bethesda, Md., reported that a vaccine made from a polysaccharide polysaccharide: see carbohydrate. polysaccharide Any of a large class of long-chain sugars composed of monosaccharides. Because the chains may be unbranched or branched and the monosaccharides may be of one, two, or occasionally more kinds, capsule surrounding the typhoid bacterium appears to be superior to current vaccines made from whole Salmonella typhi bacteria. Scientists at NICHHD collaborated with others in Nepal, Sweden and France during a pilot study and a subsequent clinical trial of the NICHHD-developed vaccine. The two studies involved more than 7,000 Nepalese, who live in an area of the world seriously affected by typhoid fever. Spread through unsanitary un·san·i·tar·y adj. Not sanitary. conditions, typhoid fever attacks an estimated 50 million people in Asia each year, with high death rates. But currently available vaccines require multiple doses, have side effects and protect for a limited time. As reported in the Oct. 29 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE The New England Journal of Medicine (New Engl J Med or NEJM) is an English-language peer-reviewed medical journal published by the Massachusetts Medical Society. It is one of the most popular and widely-read peer-reviewed general medical journals in the world. , results from the recent Nepal studies indicate that a single injection of the new vaccine lowered the risk of developing the disease approximately four-fold, compared to those not immunized. Such protection is as good as or better than present vaccines. Although the new vaccine produced protective antibodies in only 75 percent of those tested, the authors conclude it is preferable, with fewer side effects. |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion