Trial lawyers challenge the constitutionality of Ohio 'tort reform' law.Ohio trial lawyers have asked the state supreme court to turn back a broad "tort reform" law that limits damages awards and makes it harder for plaintiffs to file personal injury lawsuits. The plaintiffs--the Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers and the Ohio AFL-CIO--contend that the one-year-old, pro-business law violates the state constitution by overriding several civil and evidentiary rules of procedure created by the state supreme court. (Ohio Academy of Dial Lawyers v. Sheward, No. 97-2419 (Ohio filed Nov. 20, 1997).) Characterizing the Ohio General Assembly's action as "overreaching Exploiting a situation through Fraud or Unconscionable conduct. ," the plaintiffs urged the state supreme court "to rebuff this illicit power grab and restore the constitutional separation of powers separation of powers: see Constitution of the United States. separation of powers Division of the legislative, executive, and judicial functions of government among separate and independent bodies. that is an essential component of American liberty." The plaintiffs argued that the law addresses more than one issue, a violation of the state's "one-subject" rule, which was designed to prevent the legislature from addressing disparate topics under one law. They added that the law's mandate for damages caps denies plaintiffs their right to due process and to a jury trial. The legal action is unusual in two ways, according to Robert Peck, ATLA's director of legal affairs, who represents the Ohio trial lawyers. First, the plaintiffs filed directly in the state supreme court rather than in a lower court, and, second, they are seeking a defendant class certification for Ohio's 573 trial court judges who are responsible for carrying out the provisions of the law. The trial lawyers seek a declaratory judgment declaratory judgment In law, a judgment merely declaring a right or establishing the legal status or interpretation of a law or instrument. It is binding but is distinguished from other judgments or court opinions in that it includes no executive element (an order that ; a writ of prohibition writ of prohibition n. pl. writs of prohibition An order issued by a higher court commanding a lower court to cease from proceeding in some matter not within its jurisdiction. Noun 1. , which has attributes of an injunction to stop specific conduct; and a writ of mandamus Noun 1. writ of mandamus - an extraordinary writ commanding an official to perform a ministerial act that the law recognizes as an absolute duty and not a matter for the official's discretion; used only when all other judicial remedies fail mandamus , which orders the judges to implement existing law regardless of existing "tort reform" statutes. Legal shortcomings A shortcoming is a character flaw. Shortcomings may also be:
According to the plaintiffs, the law places caps on noneconomic damages awards; * requires personal injury plaintiffs to file a "medical certificate of merit" before filing suit; * requires separate trials to determine compensatory and punitive awards; * restricts certain types of evidence from being admitted at trial; and * discriminates against automobile collision plaintiffs by creating presumptions about alcohol and drug impairment that do not also apply to defendants. Peck said the legislature's "illicit arrogation Claiming or seizing something without justification; claiming something on behalf of another. In Civil Law, the Adoption of an adult who was legally capable of acting for himself or herself. ARROGATION, civil law. of power tilts the litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute. When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation. playing field in favor of wrongdoers," which will deter plaintiffs from filing suits. |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion