Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,632,679 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Treats v. Morgan.


U.S. Appeals Court

PEPPER SPRAY

EXCESSIVE FORCE

Treats v. Morgan, 308 F.3d 868 (8th Cir. 2002). A state prisoner one in confinement, or under arrest, for a political offense.

See also: State
 sued corrections officials under [section] 1983 alleging his Eighth Amendment rights were violated vi·o·late  
tr.v. vi·o·lat·ed, vi·o·lat·ing, vi·o·lates
1. To break or disregard (a law or promise, for example).

2. To assault (a person) sexually.

3.
 when he was sprayed with pepper spray and thrown to the floor. The district court denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment motion for summary judgment n. a written request for a judgment in the moving party's favor before a lawsuit goes to trial and based on recorded (testimony outside court) affidavits (or declarations under penalty of perjury), depositions, admissions of fact, answers  and the appeals court affirmed af·firm  
v. af·firmed, af·firm·ing, af·firms

v.tr.
1. To declare positively or firmly; maintain to be true.

2. To support or uphold the validity of; confirm.

v.intr.
. The appeals court held that summary judgment was precluded by a genuine issue of material fact as to whether it was reasonable for the officer to use of pepper spray and force against the prisoner who failed to obey commands, but who had not jeopardized any person's safety or threatened prison security. The prisoner alleged that he was sprayed in the face without any warning by an officer, and then thrown to the floor and handcuffed by a lieutenant. (North Center Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:USE OF FORCE
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 1, 2003
Words:147
Previous Article:Hill v. McKinley.(sheriff violated Fourth Amendment right to privacy)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Gonzalez-Jimenez De Ruiz v. U.S.(prison officials deceived the inmate's family regarding the inmate's terminal condition)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Views of a new physician. (health care delivery)
Current Research in Arts Medicine: A Compendium of the Med-Art International 1992 World Congress on Arts and Medicine.
Privatization and the Welfare State: Implications for Consumers and the Workforce.
GAFFE BURNS SYNCOR STOCK WEB ERROR COSTS MILLIONS.(Business)
Generating interest in the ASMC Korea Chapter. (Chapter Idea Interchange).(Brief Article)
The Bishops & Iraq: where was the coverage?
Student, or customer? (Feedback).
Bishops in New York sue over new medical insurance law. (Catholic Health Care).
Ellison, David. Chalk dust; a teacher's marks.(Book Review)(Brief Article)
Affirmative action.(News for Educational Workers)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles