Printer Friendly
The Free Library
23,416,918 articles and books


Treatment modalities in children with teeth affected by molar-incisor enamel hypomineralisation (MIH): a systematic review.

Introduction

Molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) is defined as the developmentally-derived dental defect that involves hypomineralisation of 1 to 4 permanent first molars (FPM), frequently associated with similarly affected permanent incisors [Weerheijm et al., 2003; Mathu-Muju and Wright 2006]. The defect is the result of a variety of environmental factors acting systemically, including prenatal, perinatal and childhood medical conditions that affect the developing enamel, while an underlying genetic predisposition could not be excluded [Lygidakis et al., 2008b, Alaluusua, 2010]. MIH presents as demarcated enamel opacities of different colour in the affected teeth that occasionally undergo post-eruptive breakdown due to soft and porous enamel, resulting in atypical cavities or even to complete coronal distortion [Weerheijm et al., 2003]. Accordingly the defect reveals serious clinical management problems attracting the attention of the dental profession the last decade [Lygidakis et al., 2003; Mathu-Muju and Wright 2006].

Following the establishment of the presently used diagnostic criteria for MIH [Weerheijm et al., 2003], a number of well-documented studies have reported on the prevalence of the disorder and were reviewed by Jalevik [2010]. Previous studies recorded a prevalence of 5.9-14.3% in Europe, while there are few studies concerning America and other parts of the world [Fleita et al, 2006; Willmott et al., 2008]. Additionally MIH prevalence has a strong positive correlation with the overall prevalence of developmental defects of enamel. Muratbegovic et al. [2008] showed that prevalence of DDE fell after exclusion of MIH patients from 32.8% to 21.4%.

Accordingly it is clear that MIH is an important clinical problem often concerning both general dentists and specialist paediatric dentists. As caries rates have declined in western countries, paediatric dental defects have become more apparent, requiring more complex and long-term treatment. As a result over the last few years a limited number of papers have appeared dealing with the treatment of MIH. The aim of this paper was to review the literature concerning the treatment of MIH, comment about possible shortcomings and propose areas of future research.

Methodology

A broad search of MedLine, Scopus, ResearchGate, Isis and Google Scholar databases was conducted for the years 1980 until 2009, using as index terms 'treatment or management or therapy or clinical approach' AND 'dental enamel defects', 'developmental enamel defects', 'chronological enamel defects', 'molar-incisor-hypomineralisation', 'non fluoride hypomineralisation of permanent teeth', 'idiopathic hypomineralisation of permanent teeth', 'cheese molars', 'hypomineralised permanent molars' and 'hypomineralised permanent incisors'. Papers other than in English were excluded. All abstracts were read and the full text of relevant ones were then read. The reference list of each of these papers was additionally examined in order to locate any further references that may not have been found in the search engines previously mentioned.

Of the 189 initial references, 93 were selected based on their abstracts, the remaining papers dealing with inherited enamel defects. After a reading of each paper, 66 papers were chosen for inclusion, 32 supportive to the review and 34 relevant to the subject. From these 66, those dealing exclusively with treatment options and outcomes to MIH, either laboratory or clinical comprised only 14 for final evaluation. An additional 9 publications dealt with structural properties of MIH enamel, dentine and pulp, relevant to treatment. Since 2000, 11 reviews evaluated and described, to a certain extent, the treatment options of such defective teeth. The following reviews were used in the present paper: Croll, [2000]; Wray and Welbury, [2001]; Mahoney, [2001]; Fayle, [2003]; Williams and Gowans [2003]; Mathu-Muju and Wright, [2006]; William et al. [2006a]; Sapir and Shapira, [2007]; Fitzpatrick and O'Connell, [2007]; Willmott et al. [2008]; Daly and Waldron, [2009].

From this limited number of studies, even though they had shortcomings, it was evident that a 'treatment guidelines flow-diagram', based on SIGN methodology, is presently impossible to be made for MIH. According to the SIGN criteria, the grade of recommendation from all studies was moderate (C-D) [Sign, 50].

Results

Clinical problems in MIH. Patient and parents concerns related to MIH include aesthetics, rapid wear and enamel loss, increased susceptibility to caries, sensitivity, and finally tooth loss [Leppaniemi et al., 2001; Jalevik and Klingberg, 2002; Willmott et al., 2008]. When post-eruptive breakdown occurs in MIH teeth, the porous sub-surface enamel and even the dentine are exposed, resulting in teeth sensitive to cold air, warm water and food and tooth brushing [Jalevik and Klingberg, 2002]. Poor oral hygiene favours plaque retention and promotes rapid caries development [Leppaniemi et al., 2001; Mahoney, 2001].

Children with MIH receive much more dental treatment than unaffected children [Kotsanos et al., 2005; Chawla et al, 2008]. Affected molars usually require extensive treatment and might create serious problems for both patient and clinician, as they can frequently be difficult to anaesthetise and to restore adequately. The porous exposed subsurface enamel and the dentine may promote bacteria penetration into the dentine resulting to chronic inflammation of the pulp, complicating the use of local analgesia [Rodd et al., 2007; Fargell et al., 2008]. Research has shown that by the age of 9-years, children affected with MIH teeth had undergone dental treatment on their FPM nearly 10 times more frequently than unaffected controls and that each affected tooth had been treated on average twice [Jalevik and Klingberg, 2002]. A considerable proportion of treatment needs for MIH patients was the treatment of affected FPM [Leppaniemi et al., 2001; Muratbegovic et al., 2007]. In addition, it was found that the actual treatment needs were probably underestimated by evaluating only carious, restored and extracted teeth; these patients would also require further restorative, orthodontic and preventive care [Leppaniemi et al., 2001]. Finally for the 18-year-olds there was an additional treatment need in almost half of the patients who had had their FPM restored previously [Mejare et al., 2005].

Apart from the restorative difficulties faced by clinicians, children with MIH have considerable behaviour management problems; dental fear and anxiety are more commonly found in these children. Behaviour problems can be related to pain experienced by the patients during multiple treatment appointments, as many of them were either inadequately anesthetised or even had treatment without local analgesia [Jaalevik and Klingberg, 2002].

A clinical approach for treating MIH. A very useful 6-step management approach for MIH has been proposed recently by William et al. [2006a]:

* Risk identification,

* Early diagnosis,

* Remineralisation (a better term may be mineralisation; the tooth was never 'completely' mineralised during development although there may also be an element of demineralisation from enamel caries, superimposed upon the hypomineralised areas) and desensitisation,

* Prevention of dental caries and post eruptive enamel breakdown,

* Restorations or extractions,

* Maintenance.

Additionally a valuable treatment decision tree was created by Mathu-Muju and Wright [2006] who proposed a treatment approach according to the level of defect severity (mild, moderate, severe) and to the length of treatment time needed (short and long term). According to those authors the following clinical criteria should be considered in order to divide the defects in the 3 different severity levels:

* Mild MIH: Demarcated opacities are in non-stress-bearing areas of FPM, there are isolated opacities, no enamel loss from fracturing is present in opaque areas, there is no history of dental hypersensitivity, there are no caries associated with the affected enamel, and incisor involvement is usually mild if present.

* Moderate MIH: Intact atypical restorations can be present, demarcated opacities are present on occlusal/ incisal third of teeth without posteruptive enamel breakdown, posteruptive enamel breakdown/caries are limited to 1 or 2 surfaces without cuspal involvement, dental sensitivity is generally reported as normal, aesthetic concerns are frequently expressed by the patient or parent

* Severe MIH: Posteruptive enamel breakdown is present and frequently occurs as the tooth is emerging, there is a history of dental sensitivity, often widespread caries is associated with the affected enamel, crown destruction can readily advance to involve the dental pulp, defective atypical restoration is present, aesthetic concerns are expressed by the patient or parent.

In assessing the review of William et al. [2006a], although it is very informative and suggestive, the clear cut treatment decision tree proposed by Mathu-Muju and Wright [2006] gives a better way of dealing with MIH clinically and for the long term. The division, however of the severity of the defects into 3 categories is complicated and might not help the clinician. Another way of categorizing the defect should be investigated, evaluated and agreed upon.

Overall preventive approach and advice. It is very important to start approaching the affected children and their parents with the appropriate dietary and preventive advice. As it has been proposed in a recent extensive review by Willmott et al [2008], if a child is still using a low-fluoride children's toothpaste then the parents should be encouraged to change to one with a higher fluoride level of at least 1,000 ppm F [EAPD, 2009]. Other topical fluorides may also be useful; amongst these are topical fluoride varnishes, e.g. Duraphat[R] 22,600ppm F (Colgate Oral Care) and Gelkam[R] 1,000ppm F (Colgate Oral Care). Although there is no research at present to evaluate their efficacy in MIH patients, all these products may help to reduce sensitivity and enhance mineralisation of the hypomineralised areas.

Another product that might be also useful for MIH patients and requires further research [William et al., 2006a; Willmott et al., 2008] is Casein (Phosphopepetide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate, CPP-ACP). This product has been shown to create and stabilise a super saturated solution of calcium and phosphate followed by deposition at the enamel surface. CPP-ACP has been incorporated into sugar-free chewing gum and encourages remineralisation of the sub-surface carious lesions [Shen et al., 2001]. Following these findings it has been empirically suggested that home application of a CPP-ACP containing cream will help seal, desensitise and act as a source of bio-available calcium and phosphate for an erupting tooth with MIH [Willmott et al., 2008; Chawla et al, 2008]. Finally the use of 0.4% stannous fluoride gels on a daily basis have also been proposed to be helpful for reducing sensitivity in defective teeth [Fayle, 2003].

Fissure sealants (FS) may also be useful for FPM with mild defects, not sensitive and without breakdown, particularly when they are regularly monitored and replaced when lost [Fayle, 2003; Mathu-Muju and Wright 2006; William et al., 2006a]. Mathu and Wright [2006] suggested that if the fissures appeared opaque or yellow-brown then a 60 second pre-treatment with 5% sodium hypochlorite might be beneficial in that it might remove intrinsic enamel proteins. Limited clinical information on using FS in affected teeth comes from the study by Kotsanos et al. [2005] who reported that FS in 35 MIH molars had to be retreated after a shorter period of time than FS in a control group. However, a recent long term clinical study in 54 children with MIH and defective molars with occlusal opacities, reported that FS appeared to have greater retention when applied using 5th generation adhesive prior to FS, compared with the conventional technique [Lygidakis et al., 2009]. FS in the former case recorded 70.2% full retention compared with 25.5% in the later (Table 1a). Finally, for partially erupted FPM with MIH, glass ionomer cements (GIC) can be used as FS, providing temporarily, caries and sensitivity protection and minimizing break-downs; as retention of such materials is poor, these should be replaced as soon as the tooth is fully erupted with resin-based sealants [William et al., 2006a].

Comments on prevention. The reviews by William et al. [2006a] and Willmott et al. [2008] deal with the subject of MIH prevention extensively and adequately providing sensible suggestions. However, the information provided is empirical and anecdotal as there are no clinical or laboratory studies on MIH teeth and suggestions are mainly based on studies of 'normal' teeth. Prospective clinical trials will help to evaluate the use of fluoride products to minimize hypersensitivity. Any CCP-ACP effect on MIH teeth should be especially evaluated, as the clinical outcome on this promising product is still controversial [Azarpazhooh and Limeback, 2008]. In addition, although stannous fluoride gel has been demonstrated to reduce dentine sensitivity [Thrash et al., 1994], this effect has yet to be confirmed by clinical trials in hypomineralised teeth.

Concerning FS, Mathu-Muju and Wright [2006] repeated a possibly valuable suggestion for pre-treatment that has been noted previously for defective enamel in amelogenesis imperfecta cases by Venezie et al. [1994]; however at the time of that report, modern adhesives did not exist, therefore the use of 5% sodium hypochlorite might not be as useful nowadays. The only available research for FS is a recent prospective clinical study [Lygidakis et al., 2009] indicating that in MIH molars with occlusal opacities, FS appear to have greater retention when applied using adhesive prior to sealant.

Restoring one or more surfaces of hypomineralised permanent molars. Having solved the difficulties in achieving local analgesia and managing a child's behaviour, restoration of the affected FPM can be further complicated by difficulties in defining the cavity margins and the choice of the suitable replacement material. Concerning the former, two empirical approaches have been proposed: removal of all defective enamel until sound surfaces are reached [William et al., 2006a; Mathu-Maju and Wright, 2006] or removal of the porous enamel only, until resistance to the bur or to the probe is felt [Lygidakis et al., 2003; Fayle, 2003]. The first approach means that a lot of tooth material is lost but is better if an adhesive material is to rely upon bonding to enamel. The second approach is less invasive, but it can mean that the defective enamel may continue to chip away.

There are many restorative materials/options available to the dental surgeon treating these patients: GIC, Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements (RMGIC), Polyacid modified composite resins (PMCR), Composite resins (CR), and amalgam. Amalgam is a non-adhesive material and its use in these atypically shaped cavities is not indicated; the inability to protect the remaining structures usually results in further enamel breakdown [Croll 2000; Fayle, 2003; William et al., 2006a]. The few existing clinical studies of amalgam restorations in MIH molars support this view as they report lower success rates when compared with CR [Kotsanos et al., 2005; Mejare et al., 2005].

Regarding other restorative materials and options there is very little evidence to support their use [Fayle, 2003; Mathu-Maju and Wright, 2006]. Restorations with GIC, RMGIC and PMCR are not recommended in the stress bearing areas of FPMs and they can only used as intermediate approach until a definite restoration is placed [Mahoney 2001; William et al., 2006a; Willmott et al., 2008]. GIC has been additionally proposed as an intermediate layer restoring the dentinal contours, prior to composite placement, in cases that the cavity involves large areas of dentine [Mathu-Maju and Wright, 2006].

The only material that appears to be usable for one or more surfaces restorations in MIH molars is CR. There are 3 clinical studies dealing with the outcome of such restorations in MIH molars (Table 1a). Lygidakis et al. [2003] evaluating the success rate of CR restorations placed on two or more surfaces including cusps of affected molars, reported good/ acceptable results after 4 years. Following a strict clinical procedure, none of 49 restorations (18 two/31 three surfaces) needed replacement by the end of the study. Mejare et al. [2005] followed 76 children with various types of restorations for a period of 5.2 [+ or -] 3.29 years. In FPMs, GIC had the lowest and CR the highest success rate, amalgam and compomers being in the middle. From the 34 CR placed, 29 (85.3%) had a good/acceptable outcome, the remaining needing replacement. Finally Kotsanos et al. [2005] reported a 74.4% success rate of CR restorations placed on MIH molars in children aged 7.7 [+ or -] 1.3 after 48 [+ or -] 30.6 months of follow-up. These authors also reported that restorations and FS in affected children had over 3 times greater probability of needing re-treatment than interventions on children of a control group.

Comments on materials. In commenting on the restorative approaches it is still unclear which approach is better for cavity preparation and further laboratory research is required. From the 3 existing clinical studies only one mentions clearly the cavity preparation technique, stating 'removal of all carious tissues together with possible previous, failed amalgam restoration and enamel easily penetrated by probe' [Lygidakis et al., 2003]. From all available restorative materials, many reviews [Fayle, 2003; Mathu-Muju and Wright 2006; William et al., 2006a; Willmott et al., 2008], agree on the superior properties of CR, combined with the new adhesive materials. The 3 clinical studies available have particular limitations. Kotsanos et al. [2005] was retrospective with no defined treatment procedure and methodology criteria and a very wide time-span of evaluation (48 [+ or -] 30.6 months). Similar limitations apply to Mejare et al. [2005] study that is also unclear about patients' ages and year of treatment (meaning different restorative materials). The Lygidakis et al. [2003] study dealt with the previous problems adequately but it had no controls for evaluation. Further long-term clinical trials should be organised, preferably multi-centre, in order to finalise this approach and the type of composite material most appropriate.

Adhesion to hypomineralised enamel. The use of various adhesive resin systems has certain limitations in MIH teeth as a result of defective enamel. A recent study by William et al. [2006b] demonstrated that adhesion to MIH enamel is possible, but the enamel-adhesive interface of defective enamel was porous with cracks, had decreased bond strength, and a higher likelihood of cohesive failure compared with sound enamel. This possible ability of adhesion to MIH enamel was found by the study of William et al. [2006b], strenghtens the previous findings by Seow and Amaratunge [1988], in AI variants, which reported that the etching patterns in hypomineralized types of AI may occasionally resemble those of normal enamel despite the presence of hypomineralisation abnormalities and morphological changes at the crystallite level. A number of studies dealing with the ultrastructure and biochemical make-up of MIH enamel [Jalevik et al., 2001a, 2005; Jalevik and Noren 2000; Fearne et al., 2004; Mahoney et al., 2004; Al-Dobiyan et al., 2006] and dentine [Fearne et al., 2004; Heijs et al., 2007] indicated that the 'full thickness enamel' surrounding the clinically defective lesions is less affected and the underlying dentine has no major structural changes. These findings may explain the acceptable results for adhesive CR restorations in molars with MIH, if all apparently defective enamel is removed.

The type of adhesive used should also play a role. William et al. [2006b] suggested that self-etching adhesives (SEA) have superior bond strength to hypomineralised enamel compared with all-etch single-bottle alcohol containing adhesives (SBA) possibly attributed to omiting rinsing thus eliminating the contamination of residual water on the bond and micro-mechanical and chemical bonding to hydroxyapatite of the SEA, as compared with micromechanical only for the SBA. However the hydrophilic properties of acetone included in some other SBA systems, may play the same role for removing the residual water from the etched enamel surface enhancing the enamel-adhesive interface. An acetone-containing adhesive system that was used prior to CR and FS in two of the clinical studies in MIH molars, mentioned previously, revealed good long-term results regarding adhesion [Lygidakis et al, 2003, 2009].

An additional procedure prior to etching in order to enhance adhesion to hypomineralised enamel has been proposed by Mathu-Maju and Wright, [2006]. They recommend pre-treatment of the enamel with 5% sodium hypochlorite in order to remove intrinsic proteins encasing the hydroxyapatite and therefore facilitate etching and resin penetration.

Comments on adhesion. The study by William et al. [2006b] covers the subject well and makes some valuable suggestions for the clinician. However, there is a limitation namely that the absence of cavity preparation prior to material placement means that results apply to defective enamel exclusively and not to 'less defective' enamel and the 'normal' dentine surrounding the lesion. Additionally, the MIH affected FPM examined for adhesion revealed yellow-brown demarcated opacities with posteruptive breakdown. This was given as the reason for failure, being a cohesion failure within the enamel, while high microshear bond strength was found in some specimens having milder whitish-creamy defects. Further laboratory research in that area is required followed by clinical trials applying the suggestions regarding the adhesive types most effective in MIH. Furthermore, the suggestion of Venezie et al. [1994] and Mathu-Maju and Wright [2006], on pre-treatment, should be evaluated in vitro and in clinical trials. It should be noted however that at the time of the original publication in 1994 there were no adhesive agents and their widespread use today might reduce the clinical value of the 5% sodium hypochlorite pre treatment.

Restoring hypomineralised permanent molars with full coronal coverage. Preformed metal crowns (PMC) for use on FPM have been used for many years to cover molars with defective enamel and they are still recommended as a treatment option for MIH posterior teeth [Fayle, 2003; William et al., 2006a; AAPD, 2008]. They prevent further tooth loss, control sensitivity, establish correct interproximal and proper occlusal contacts, are not costly and require little time to prepare and insert. Kotsanos et al. [2005] reported that no replacement was needed for PMC placed on 24 molars with MIH, for a period of 3-5 years (Table 1a). Zagdwon et al. [2003] reported good success rate with only one failure of 19 PMC placed over a 2 year-period; they also found that there were no significant differences between the longevity and success rates for PMC and cast adhesive copings (nickel chrome alloy) (Table 1a). Adhesive cast copings conserved more tooth tissue but were more technique sensitive and time consuming; additionally in young children there are short clinical crowns and large pulps and a child's cooperation might be questionable [William et al., 2006a]. From another clinical study similar acceptable results were reported for laboratory-fabricated crowns on defective molars, either gold in 29 teeth or tooth-coloured in 12 teeth [Koch and Garcia-Godoy, 2000]. From the 41 crowns placed with a modified technique for crown preparation, in children aged 6-8 years, only 2 recorded minor marginal problems, the remaining 39 being in good condition 2-5 years post placement (Table 1a).

Comments on coronal coverage. Although PMC have been used for many years by our specialty, there are only 2 clinical studies evaluating their use in MIH molars. The study of Zagdwon et al. [2003] was prospective, very well conducted with clear methodology and a detailed technique procedure, although the follow-up period was limited to 2 years (usually the time requirement for PMC maintenance is up to 10 years) and there were no follow up periapical radiographs to evaluate possible pathology. The study by Kotsanos et al. [2005], although it does provide very good results, was retrospective with no defined treatment procedure and methodology criteria and a very wide time-span of evaluation (50.2 [+ or -] 23.3 years). Therefore long-term (>7 years) prospective clinical trials are needed in order to evaluate their performance in such teeth.

The use of cast adhesive copings, as proposed by Harley and Ibbetson, [1993] for other dental defects, namely AI and DI, do seem to have a potential for the treatment of MIH molars as shown by Zagdwon et al. [2003]. Further clinical research is, however, needed in order to justify their long-term use and evaluate further the possibility of using alternative tooth-coloured materials instead of various alloys.

With the use of laboratory fabricated full crowns there is still great concern for the destructive nature of crown preparation to these immature teeth. The study by Koch and Garcia-Godoy, [2000], although presenting good results, evaluated a very limited number of coloured crowns, as compared in addition to much larger sample of gold crowns. The use of the latter however would not be well accepted by parents nowadays. Additionally, there is the transitional stage of the occlusion that children undergo during the years involved in the placement of such restorations must be considered. Finally, as Koch and Garcia-Godoy, [2000] stated:

"Placement may be difficult owing to short crowns, large pulps, previous loss of enamel and subgingival placement of crown margins. The impression material must allow for good wetting of dental surfaces. Polyether impression materials (which appear to be ideal for these cases) require a long setting time. The treatment requires the fabrication of a temporary crown, and the patient must cooperate, maintain a good oral hygiene status and, preferably, have a low risk of developing caries"

Restoring hypomineralisedpermanent incisors. As the recent research on MIH has shown, up to 71.6% of affected children may have incisors as well as FPM involved [Jalevik et al 2001b; Chawla et al, 2008; Lygidakis et al., 2008a]. In addition the most frequent (23.5%) combination of affected teeth in children with all 12 'index' teeth erupted is 4 molars/2 incisors [Lygidakis et al., 2008a]. Some of these children have serious aesthetic problems that require treatment. Unfortunately the literature lacks evidence-based results for the management of such defects for the anterior teeth (Table 1b).

According to Jalevik and Noren [2000] the yellow or brownish-yellow defects are of full thickness and more porous, whilst those that are creamy-yellow or whitish-creamy are less porous and variable in depth, located in the inner part of the enamel. As a result, the former defects may respond occasionally to bleaching with carbamide peroxide, while microabrasion using abrasive paste and 18% hydrochloric acid might be effective only in shallow patchy whitish defects (Table 1b) [Fayle, 2003; William et al., 2006a; Mathu-Muju and Wright, 2006; Joiner, 2006]. More pronounced enamel defects might be dealt with by combining the two methods [Sundfeld et al., 2007]. Both techniques are however questionable in immature teeth as microabrasion involving aggressive reduction of the enamel resulting from duration, number, and intensity of applications may occur [Sapir and Shapira, 2007]. An alternative method of polishing with pumice and etching with 37.5% phosphoric acid has been proposed to overcome these problems, but again this has not been studied on immature anterior teeth [Peariasamy et al., 2001] (Table 1b). Additionally, bleaching with 10% 38% carbamide peroxide for brownish-yellow defects is not recommended in immature teeth as it is frequently followed by side effects, such as sensitivity, mucosal irritation and enamel surface alterations, while symptoms are frequently increased with higher concentrations [Joiner 2006; AAPD, 2009]. These techniques for tooth whitening are described in detail in the UK Clinical Guidelines [Wray and Welbury, 2001], while the long-term experience with microabrasion is thoroughly evaluated in the review by Sundfeld et al. [2007].

It should be noted that all these methods, discussed above, have mainly been studied in diffuse fluorotic opacities or post-orthodontic white spots, therefore their application to hypomineralised MIH enamel should be with caution. MIH has morphological differences and distinct characteristics from the former other defects [Jaalevik et al, 2001a, 2005].

An interesting approach, namely etch-bleach-seal technique, has been suggested by Wright [2002]. According to this conservative approach for yellow-brown defects the lesions are etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 60 s, bleached with 5% sodium hypochlorite for 5-10 min, re-etched and covered with a FS over the surface to occlude porosities and prevent re-staining. Acceptable clinical results were reported for a 5 years period. Recently the technique was evaluated in 33 children aged 8-12 years, but with diffuse fluorotic opacities in their incisors and good results for colour improvement were obtained [Cardenas Flores et al., 2009]. Some other authors have suggested that aesthetic improvement can be achieved when any enamel reduction is followed by opaque resins and direct CR veneering [Fayle, 2003; Weerheijm, 2004]. Opaque resins as intermediate layers are also quite frequently necessary in order to mask the reflection of the deep discoloured lesions [Fayle, 2003].

Restorations with CR and veneers are an alternative choice for anterior MIH defective teeth in children and adolescents with larger enamel defects that require treatment [Wray and Welbury, 2001]. The choice between direct and indirect veneers depends upon a clinician's personal choice and skill and the implicated cost. It should however, be kept in mind that in the majority of cases immature teeth with large pulps are involved and therefore a conservative approach is required. Additionally, the continuous recession of the gingival margin of the anterior teeth during development implies later problems with aesthetics of full coverage veneers. Wakiaga et al. [2004] undertook a systematic review of direct versus indirect CR veneers for intrinsic dental stains and found 6 acceptable papers all in adolescents and adults but none in children. They concluded that there was no reliable evidence to show that either approach was superior to the other with regard to longevity. In the only study in young patients, Welbury [1991] looked at directly placed CR veneers in children and adolescents and found that after three years 14% had failed (Table 1b). At the time of that research there were no modern adhesives available and therefore the study, although the only one in the literature, does not reflect the present situation. Veneers using CR in long term may suffer from susceptibility to discolouration, wear and marginal fractures, reducing thereby the aesthetic long-term result [Peumans et al., 1997a,b]. In such cases and in older children and adolescents porcelain veneers are indicated [Wray and Welbury 2001; AAPD, 2008]

Comments on incisal MIH treatments. There are no studies at all evaluating the success rate of for CR restorations for MIH affected incisors. Indications for their use and success rates can nevertheless be drawn from CR studies in molars, as essentially the same technique is used. Further matters to be addressed in the anterior teeth are the additional use of opaque resins and the different mastication forces involved.

The etch-bleach-seal technique [Wright, 2002] should be clinically evaluated further in large samples of MIH incisors, as it appears promising for interceptive early approach in aesthetic problems. Chair-side bleaching with 10% carbamide peroxide, for brownish-yellow defects should be investigated but only in older children. Note should be taken of the side effects of sensitivity, mucosal irritation and enamel surface alterations [Wray and Welbury, 2001; Dahl and Pallesen, 2003; Joiner, 2006]. Micro-abrasion followed by CR restorations for creamy-whitish defects needs to be evaluated adequately in larger patient groups. Either 18% hydrochloric acid or 37% phosphoric acid can be used as both produce similar results [Berezza et al., 2005]. The replacement of micro-abrasion by local enamel thickness reduction, using high-speed headpiece, should be also evaluated. In any case all these approaches should be delayed as much as possible as clinical experience has shown that defective areas tend to get better in the oral environment.

The CR veneers for young children and adolescents with severe defects need clinical evaluation in respect to the new adhesives properties when used on defective enamel as discussed previously. In addition porcelain veneers with the new-age materials should be evaluated but only in adolescents and young adults.

Extraction and Orthodontics. In children with MIH severely affected FPM, the first clinical consideration is to decide whether to restore or extract. Although both the profession and the public believe nowadays in a more conservative treatment plan, some thought might still be given for such a radical approach, resulting usually in the extractions of several permanent teeth. Variables affecting this decision include the child's age, orthodontic considerations, presence of other dental anomalies, degree of severity of MIH, pulp involvement, presence of third molar germ(s), restorability of the tooth/teeth and expected long term treatment cost [Mejare et al., 2005; Mathu-Maju and Wright, 2006].

The FPM is not an orthodontist's first choice for extraction, because later orthodontic treatment may be complicated [Williams and Gowans, 2003]. Therefore, the decision to extract any of the FPM should be seriously evaluated and discussed with an orthodontist as early as possible if a good result is to be anticipated [Williams and Gowans, 2003; Mathu-Maju and Wright, 2006]. If such a decision has been taken the dental age of 8.5-9 years is the ideal time for their extraction. A full clinical examination and a panoramic radiograph will help to evaluate particular contributory signs for acceptable results [Williams and Gowans, 2003].

Complete crown formation and initiation of the calcification of the bifurcation of the permanent second molar, particularly in the mandible, has the potential to help the eruption of the second molar into a good contact with the second premolar, especially when crowding is present. When there is little or no crowding, a space will remain and fixed appliance treatment will be required at a later stage for closure. Considerations should be given also for further FPM extractions in the maxilla for compensation and to the contralateral molar or premolar of the same jaw for balancing, particularly in crowded cases, in order to avoid a midline shift [Williams and Gowans, 2003].

It should be stressed that all the above suggested treatment outcomes are valuable, but only in cases of extractions during the indicated best period of development. In all other cases the expected problems of such an approach (e.g. drifting and rolling of adjacent teeth, periodontal defects, occlusion problems, increased spacing), require full term orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Such treatment is usually of much longer duration than the one anticipated in cases of premolar extractions [Williams and Gowans, 2003; Seddon 2004].

However, looking to long term prognosis and treatment outcomes, Mejare et al. [2005] found that at 18-years of age the space closure that had occurred was acceptable in 87% of the individuals with extracted MIH molars, and the sagittal relationships did not differ between individuals with and without extraction, from a sample of 76 individuals that 24% had 1-3 molars extracted and 18% had all four FPM extracted. These results are challenging, particularly if we consider that the average age for extractions was 10-5 years for mandibular and 10-6 for maxillary FPMs, in the cases that received no orthodontic treatment. Additionally, a recent study by Jalevik and Moller [2007] stated that the extraction of severely affected FPM in MIH patients was an adequate treatment alternative to restorative care. They examined the orthodontic status of 20 patients 3.8-8.3 years after extractions and concluded that 15 of them had an acceptable occlusion. Space reduction and favourable development could be expected if the extractions were undertaken prior to the eruption of the permanent second molar teeth.

Comments on extractions. When extractions of MIH FPMs have been carried out, the two clinical long term studies reported acceptable results for space closure without orthodontic treatment, if defective FPM extractions are performed in due time. However, both studies present some methodological limitations and additionally it is worth noting that children in these studies were first seen and treated in the 1990s, a period when the profession was not fully aware of MIH and not many options for treatment were available. Further prospective clinical research is obviously needed in order to justify this convenient but still invasive approach in judged as unrestorable cases.

Meanwhile taking into account all previously evaluated studies, a treatment decision plan (Table 2) can be proposed in order to help the clinician deal with these MIH defects in his/ her everyday practice. The main concept for this proposal is to 'define the defect severity by individual tooth' following an initial overall decision whether to keep or to extract the tooth.

Conclusions

The information provided on treatment of MIH in the international literature is limited and empirical, relying mainly on case reports and few clinical studies. However advances in dental materials have provided clinical solutions in cases that were regarded as unrestorable in the past. Intensive individually prescribed preventive programs may postpone the initiation of the actual restorative treatment and reduce in long-term patient's discomfort. In mild and moderate MIH cases composite restorations using modern adhesives is the treatment of choice and may last for many years until permanent restorations may placed. In severe cases transitional treatment for function and aesthetics can be provided, using the various modalities now available until adolescence when permanent prosthetic approach with crowns in molars and veneers in incisors can be initiated. Long term clinical trials supported by laboratory studies are needed to provide 'guidelines' for treating MIH.

Aknowledgements.

This invited paper was presented at the 6th Interim Seminar and Workshop of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry in Helsinki, Finland, 2009

References

Ashkenazi M, Sarnat H. Microabrasion of teeth with discoloration resembling hypomaturation enamel defects: four-year follow up. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2000;25(1):29-34.

Al-Dobiyan F I, Shore R C, Duggal M S, Toumba K J. Elemental analyses of enamel of MIH molars compared to normal enamel. European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry Congress Abstract number O29. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent 2006;7:168.

Alaluusua S. Aetiology of Molar-Incisor Hypomineralisation. A systematic review. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent 2010; 10:53-58

American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Guideline on Paediatric Restorative Dentistry. Reference Manual 2008;163-169.

American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Policy on the Use of Dental Bleaching for Children and Adolescents. Council on Clinical Affairs. 2009.

Azarpazhooh A, Limeback H. Clinical efficacy of casein derivatives: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(7):915-24.

Bezerra AC, Leal SC, Otero SA, et al. Enamel opacities removal using two different acids: An in vivo comparison. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005;29 (2):147-150.

Cardenas Flores A, Flores Reyes H, Gordillo Moscoso A, et al. Clinical efficacy of 5% sodium hypochlorite for removal of stains caused by dental fluorosis. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009; 33(3):187-91.

Chawla N, Messer LB, Silva M. Clinical Studies on Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation. Part 1: Distribution and Putative Associations. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent 2008; 9(4):180-190.

Croll TP. Restorative options for malformed permanent molars in children. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000;21:676-682.

Dahl JE, Pallesen U. Tooth bleaching. A critical review of the biological aspects. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 2003;14; 292.

Daly D, Waldron JM. Molar incisor hypomineralisation: clinical management of the young patient. J Ir Dent Assoc 2009;55(2): 83-86.

European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Guidelines on the use of fluoride in children: an EAPD policy document. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent 2009;10:120-135.

Fagrell TG, Lingstrom P, Olsson S, et al. Bacterial invasion of dentinal tubules beneath apparently intact but hypomineralized enamel in molar teeth with molar incisor hypomineralisation. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18(5):333-40.

Fayle SA. Molar incisor hypomineralisation: restorative management. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2003; 4:121-126.

Fearne J, Anderson P, Davis G R. 3D X-ray microscopic study of the extent of variations in enamel density in first permanent molars with idiopathic enamel hypomineralisation. Br Dent J 2004; 196:634-638.

Fitzpatrick L, O'Connell A. First permanent molars with molar incisor hypomineralisation. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2007;53(1):32-7.

Fleita D, Ali A, Alaluusua S. Molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) in a group of school-aged children in Benghazi, Libya. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent. 2006;7(2):92-95.

Harley KE, Ibbetson RJ. Dental anomalies--are adhesive castings the solution? Brit Dent J. 1993; 174(1):15-22.

Heijs S C, Dietz W, Noren J G, Blanksma N G, Jalevik B. Morhology and chemical composition of dentin in permanent first molars with the diagnose MIH. Swed Dent J 2007;31:155-164.

Jalevik B, Noren J G. Enamel hypomineralisation of permanent first molars: a morphological study and survey of possible aetiological factors. Int J Paediatr Dent 2000;10:278-289.

Jalevik B, Odelius H, Dietz W, Noren J G. Secondary ion mass spectrometry and x-ray microanalysis of hypomineralised enamel in human permanent first molars. Arch Oral Biol 2001a;46:239-247.

Jalevik B, Klingberg G, Barregard L, Noren JG. The prevalence of demarcated opacities in permanent first molars in a group of Swedish children. Acta Odontol Scand 2001b;59:255-260.

Jalevik, B. Klingberg GA. Dental treatment, dental fear and behaviour management problems in children with severe enamel hypomineralisation of their permanent first molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002; 12(1): 24-32.

Jalevik B, Dietz W, Noren J G. Scanning electron micrograph analysis of hypomineralized enamel in permanent first molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2005;15:233-240.

Jalevik B, Moller M. Evaluation of spontaneous space closure and development of permanent dentition after extraction of hypomineralised permanent first molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007;17:328-335.

Jalevik B. Prevalence and Diagnosis of Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation (MIH). A systematic review. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent 2010; 10: 59-64

Joiner A. The bleaching of teeth: A review of the literature. J Dent. 2006;34:412-419.

Koch MJ, Garcia-Godoy F. The clinical performance of laboratory-fabricated crowns placed on first permanent molars with developmental defects. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131(9):1285-90.

Kotsanos N, Kaklamanos EG, Arapostathis K. Treatment management of first permanent molars in children with Molar-Incisor Hypomineralisation. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2005;6(4):179-84.

Leppaniemi A, Lukinmaa P-L, Alaluusua S. Nonfluoride Hypomineralisation in the permanent first molars and their impact on treatment need. Caries Res 2001;35:36-40.

Lygidakis NA, Chaliasou A, Siounas G. Evaluation of composite restorations in hypomineralised permanent molars: a four-year clinical trial. Eur J Pae diatr Dent 2003;4(3):143-148.

Lygidakis NA, Dimou G, Briseniou E. Molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH). Retrospective clinical study in Greek children. I. Prevalence and defect characteristics. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent 2008a;9:200-206.

Lygidakis NA, Dimou G, Marinou D. Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation (MIH). A retrospective clinical study in Greek children. II. Possible medical aetio-logical factors. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent. 2008b; 9(4):207-17.

Lygidakis NA, Dimou G, Stamataki E. Retention of fissure sealants using two different methods of application in children with hypomineralised molars (MIH): A 4 year clinical study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2009;10(4):223-6.

Mahoney EK. The treatment of localised hypoplastic and hypomineralized defects in first permanent molars. N Z Dent J. 2001;97(429):101-5.

Mahoney EK, Rohanizadeh R, Ismail FSM, Kilpatrick NM, Swain MV. Mechanical properties and microstructure of hypomineralised enamel of permanent teeth. Biomaterials 2004;25:5091-5100.

Mathu-Muju K, Wright JT. Diagnosis and treatment of molar incisor hypomineralisation. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2006;27(11):604-10.

Mejare I, Bergman E, Grindefjord M. Hypomineralized molars and incisors of unknown origin: treatment outcome at age 18 years. Int J Paediatr Dent 2005;15:20-28.

Muratbegovic A, Markovic N, Selinovic M G. Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Prevalence, aetiology and clinical consequences in medium caries activity population. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent 2007;8:189-194.

Muratbegovic A, Zukanovic A, Markovic N. Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation impact on developmental defects of enamel prevalence in a low fluoridated area. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent 2008; 9(4):228-231.

Peariasamy K, Anderson P, Brook AH. A quantitative study of the effect of pumicing and etching on the remineralisation of enamel opacities. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001;11(3):193-200.

Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, et al. The five-year clinical performance of direct composite additions to correct tooth form and position. Part I: aesthetic qualities. Clinical Oral Investigations 1997a;1:12-18.

Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, et al. The five-year clinical performance of direct composite additions to correct tooth form and position. Part II: marginal qualities. Clinical Oral Investigations 1997b;1:19-26.

Rodd H D, Boissonade F M, Day P F. Pulpal status of hypomineralised permanent molars. Pediatr Dent 2007; 29: 514-520.

Sapir S, Shapira J. Clinical solutions for developmental defects of enamel and dentin in children. Pediatr Dent 2007;29(4):330-6.

Seddon JL. Extraction of four first molars: a case for a general practitioner? J Orthod 2004;31(2):80-85.

Seow WK, Amaratunge A. The effects of acid-etching on enamel from different clinical variants of amelogenesis imperfecta: an SEM study. Pediatr Dent 1998; 0(1):37-42.

Shen P, Cai F, Nowicki A, Vincent J, Reynolds E C. Remineralisation of enamel subsurface lesions by sugar-free chewing gum containing Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous calcium Phosphate. J Dent Res 2001;80:2066-2070.

Sign 50. A guideline developer's handbook. http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/ sign50.pdf

Sundfeld RH, Croll TP, Briso AL, de Alexandre RS, Sundfeld Neto D. Considerations about enamel microabrasion after 18 years. Am J Dent. 2007;20(2):67-72.

Thrash WJ, Dodds MW, Jones DL. The effect of stannous fluoride on dentinal hypersensitivity. Int Dent J 1994;44( Suppl 1):107-18.

Venezie RD, Vadiakas G, Christensen JR, Wright JT. Enamel pretreatment with sodium hypochlorite to enhance bonding in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta: case report and SEM analysis. Pediatr Dent 1994;6(6):433-6.

Wakiaga J, Brunton P, Silikas N, Glenny AM. Direct versus indirect veneers for intrinsic dental stains. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2004 issue 1.

Weerheijm KL, Jalevik B, Alaluusua S. Molar-Incisor Hypomineralisation. Caries Res 2001;35:390-1.

Weerheijm KL, Duggal M, Mejare I, et al. Judgement criteria for Molar-IncisorHypomineralisation (MIH) in epidemiologic studies: a summary of the European meeting on MIH held in Athens, 2003. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent 2003;3:110-113.

Weerheijm KL. Molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH): clinical presentation, aetiology and management. Dent Update 2004;31(1): 9-12.

Welbury RR. A clinical study of a microfilled composite resin for labial veneers. Int J Paediatr Dent 1991;1:9-15.

William V, Messer LB, Burrow MF. Molar incisor hypomineralisation: review and recommendations for clinical management. Pediatr Dent 2006a;28(3):224-32.

William V, Burrow MF, Palamara JE, et al. Microshear bond strength of resin composite to teeth affected by molar hypomineralisation using 2 adhesive systems. Pediatr Dent 2006b;28:233-41.

Williams JK, Gowans AJ. Hypomineralised first permanent molars and the orthodontist. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2003;4:129-132.

Willmott NS, Bryan RA, Duggal MS. Molar-incisor-hypomineralisation: a literature review. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent. 2008;9(4):172-9.

Wong FSL, Winter GB. Effectiveness of microabrasion technique for improvement of dental aesthetics. Br Dent J. 2002;193(3):155-158.

Wray A, Welbury R. Treatment of intrinsic discoloration in permanent anterior teeth in children and adolescents. UK National Clinical guidelines in Pae diatric Dentistry. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001;11:309-315.

Wright JT. The etch-bleach-seal technique for managing stained enamel defects in young permanent incisors. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:249-252.

Zagdwon AM, Fayle SA, Pollard MA. A prospective clinical trial comparing preformed metal crowns and cast restorations for defective first permanent molars. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2003;4:138-142.

N.A. Lygidakis

Dept of Paediatric Dentistry, Community Dental Centre for Children, Athens, Greece.

Postal address: Dr N. A. Lygidakis, 2 Papadiamantopoulou Street, Athens 11528, Greece.

Email: lygidakis@ath.forthnet.gr
Table 1a: Papers/studies reported on clinical modalities in
hypomineralised molars (MIH).

Study          No of   No of            Study          Age *
               chil-   MIH teeth        design
               dren    evaluated

Koch and       12      41 molars; 25    Clinical       6-8
Garcia-                with opacities   prospective
Godoy                  12 enamel
[2000]                 hypoplasia, 4
                       hypomineral-
                       ised AI

Zagdwon et     17      42 molars with   18 cases,      6-16
al [2003]              DDE and AI       clinical
                                        prospec-
                                        tive, 24
                                        cases, split
                                        mouth

Kotsanos et    36 +    136 molars       Retrospec-     7.7 [+ or -]
al [2003]      36                       tive           1.3
               con-                     with
               trols                    controls

Lygidakis et   46      49 molars        Prospective    8-10
al [2003]

Mejare et al   76      153 molars       Retrospec-     6-17,
[2005]                                  tive           mean
                                                       (8.5 [+ or -]
                                                       2.16)

Lygidakis et   47      47 sets of       Prospec-       6-7
al [2009]              molars           tive, half
                       21 maxilla       mouth
                       26 mandible      double
                                        blind

Study          Restoration       Dura-
               Methods           tion **

Koch and       29 gold crowns    2-5
Garcia-        4 composite
Godoy          crowns
[2000]         8 ceramic
               crowns

Zagdwon et     19 PMC            Mean =
al [2003]      23 nickel         1.6
               chrome alloy      (range
               adhesive casts    1-2)

Kotsanos et    35 sealants       33.0 ([+ or -]
al [2003]      18 amalgam        25.7)
               fillings          32.3 ([+ or -]
               59 composite      30.3)
               fillings          48.3 ([+ or -]
               24 PMC            30.6)-

Lygidakis et   49 Composite      4
al [2003]      resin
               (18 two sur-
               faces, 31 three
               surfaces)

Mejare et al   63 GIC            5.2
[2005]         14 compomer       ( [+ or -] 3.29)
               34 composite
               32 amalgam
               1 SSC
               9 castings

Lygidakis et   Adhesive FS       4
al [2009]      (group A) vs
               conventional
               (Group B)

Study          Results

Koch and       100% retention
Garcia-        Excellent (39) or acceptable (2) in:
Godoy          Marginal Adaptation
[2000]         Supragingival Margins
               At the end of the study: all teeth vital, no
               secondary caries

Zagdwon et     94.7% acceptable
al [2003]      91.3% acceptable,
               Adhesive casts 4 times more expensive
               than PMCs

Kotsanos et    87.1% acceptable
al [2003]      38.9% acceptable
               74.6%acceptable
               100% acceptable

Lygidakis et   100% full retention, Ryge A:
al [2003]      Surfaces appearance 93.8%
               Colour match 79.5%
               Marginal adaptation 100%
               Anatomic form 91.8%
               0/49 with pulp necrosis at the end

Mejare et al   49.2% acceptable
[2005]         64.3% acceptable
               85.3%acceptable
               78.1% acceptable
               100% acceptable
               100%acceptable
               5/153 with pulp necrosis

Lygidakis et   Group A: 70.2% were fully sealed, 29.7%
al [2009]      partly sealed, none unsealed.
               Group B: 25.5% fully sealed, 44.6% partly
               sealed, 29.7% unsealed

* age in years at time of first examination; ** years; NR--not
recorded; DDE--dental developmental defects; PMC--preformed metal
crown

Table 1b: Papers/studies reporting on clinical modalities in
hypomineralised incisors (MIH).

                 No of      No of MIH teeth     Study design
Study            children   evaluated

Welbury [1991]   66         52 incisors/        prospective
                            canines with
                            'hypoplasia'
                            (from a group of
                            289 teeth ***)

Ashkenazi and    5          NR. Teeth           Prospective
Sarnat [2000]               presented           observation
                            brown or white
                            DDE resembling
                            hypo-maturation

Peariasamy et    NR         30 molars with      Experimental
al [2001]                   demarcated or       with controls
                            diffuse opacities

Wong and         15 out     30 central          Prospective
Winter [2002]    of 32      incisors with
                 ***        demarcated
                            white/yellow
                            opacities

Wright [2002]    NR         NR                  Prospective
                                                observation

                 Age *      Restoration Methods         Duration *
Study

Welbury [1991]   6-18       Composite resin veneers     0.5-2.5
                            with feathered or bevel-
                            led or overlapped incisal
                            edge.

Ashkenazi and    9-11       Microabrasion with          Up to 4
Sarnat [2000]               pumice and 37% HCl

Peariasamy et    NR         Pumicing for 30-35          NR
al [2001]                   sec and etching for 1
                            or 2 min with 37.5%
                            phosphoric acid.

Wong and         NR         Microabrasion with          0.5
Winter [2002]               Prema abrasive paste
                            and 18% HCl

Wright [2002]    Chil-      Surface etched with 37%     Up to 5
                 dren       phosphoric acid for 60
                 with       s, b) bleached with 5%
                 young      sodium hypochlodite for
                 perma-     5-10 min, c) re-etched
                 nent       and covered with a
                 incisors   sealant

                 Results
Study

Welbury [1991]   86% acceptable
                 Failures due to partial or
                 complete loss of com-
                 posite, adhesive failure,
                 poor colour match.

Ashkenazi and    'surprising' satisfactory
Sarnat [2000]    results

Peariasamy et    Removal of 34 [+ or -] 4
al [2001]        [micro] mof the surface
                 enamel without mineral loss
                 in the subsurface.
                 Formation of a 'new'
                 mineralized surface
                 22 [+ or -] 3 [micro]m,
                 with favorable
                 optical properties

Wong and         Statistically significant
Winter [2002]    (p=0.03) immediate
                 and long term satisfac-
                 tion with the result by
                 patients and parents

Wright [2002]    Good results with
                 'no-staining after resin
                 perfusion'

* age in years at time of first examination; ** years; *** Remaining
patients or teeth revealed different type of defects; NR--not
recorded; DDE--dental developmental defects

Table 2: Proposed treatment decision plan for MIH teeth.

Mild Defects

Enamel opacities without break-down,
no/slight sensitivity, mild aesthetic problems, no caries

Molars                               Incisors if needed

Fluoride varnish in partially        In brownish-yellow defects, etch-
erupted teeth                        bleach-seal approach in younger
                                     children, or chair-side bleaching
                                     with 10% carbamide peroxide
                                     in older.

When fully erupted, sealants with    In whitish defects, micro-
prior adhesives                      abrasion followed if needed by
                                     CR restoration

CR restorations if break-down or     CR restorations following enamel
caries occur                         reduction

Full porcelain crowns, if needed,
in adulthood

Moderate/Severe Defects

Enamel break-down, atypical restorations,
sensitivity, caries, aesthetic problems

Molars                               Incisors if needed

Consider extractions                 Wait until the defect gets better,
                                     since a degree of enamel
                                     mineralisation may occur in the
                                     salivary environment

Fluoride varnish or GIC in           CR restorations or veneers fol-
partially erupted teeth              lowing micro-abrasion or enamel
                                     reduction and intermediate
                                     opaque resins

CR restorations for up to 3          Porcelain veneers if needed in
surfaces                             adulthood

PM crowns or copings for more
than 3 surfaces
Full porcelain crowns in
adulthood

Ongoing preventive care for all cases
COPYRIGHT 2010 European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Lygidakis, N.A.
Publication:European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:4EUGR
Date:Jun 1, 2010
Words:8587
Previous Article:Prevalence and diagnosis of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH): a systematic review.
Next Article:Best clinical practice guidance for clinicians dealing with children presenting with molar-incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH): an EAPD policy document.
Topics:

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters