Transplantation of Embryonic Dopamine Neurons for Severe Parkinson's Disease.Transplantation of Embryonic Dopamine Neurons for Severe Parkinson's Disease Freed CR, Greene PE, Breeze RE, et al (University of Colorado University of Colorado may refer to:
http://upenn.edu/. Address: Philadelphia, PA, USA. Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa; North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY), N Engl J Med. 2001;344:710-719. A number of small, unblinded studies report that patients with Parkinson disease (PD) have improved clinically after the transplantation of human embryonic dopamine neurons. The researchers conducted a randomized ran·dom·ize tr.v. ran·dom·ized, ran·dom·iz·ing, ran·dom·iz·es To make random in arrangement, especially in order to control the variables in an experiment. , double-blind, sham-surgery-controlled study to determine if the transplanted embryonic dopamine neurons survived and if the implant improved the symptoms of patients with severe PD. A secondary goal was to determine if the success of the transplant was related to the age of the patient. Patients with severe PD (mean duration= 14 years) between the ages of 34 and 70 (N=40; 19 women, 21 men; average age=57 [+ or -] 10 years) were randomly assigned to receive either an injection of cultured embryonic mesencephalic mes·en·ce·phal·ic adj. Of or relating to the mesencephalon. neurons in their putamen putamen /pu·ta·men/ (pu-ta´men) the larger and more lateral part of the lentiform nucleus. pu·ta·men n. or a sham surgical procedure. The primary outcome variable was the patient's subjective global rating of clinical improvement or deterioration at 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcome variables were standardized scores measured using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Neurology A measure of severity of Parkinson's disease, based on a scale from 0 to 160 total scale and 0 to 44 motor section. See Parkinson's disease. (UPDRS UPDRS Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale ) and the Schwab and England scale and the growth of the transplants as measured by [sup.18]F-fluorodopa positron-emission tomography (PET) scans. There were no differences between the treatment and control groups in the global rating scale used by the patients (mean score=0.0 [+ or -] 2.1 and--0.4 [+ or -] 1.7 respectively). However, there were improvements in the UPDRS and Schwab and England scores, particularly in the motor components (rigidity and bradykinesia, but not tremor) in the younger ([is less than or equal to] 60 years of age) patients in the treatment group compared with the younger patients in control group 1 year after surgery. The PET scans revealed that the transplants had survived and were growing in almost all of the patients (17 of 20). The researchers concluded that most transplants survived in patients regardless of age but that the implants provided some clinical benefit only to patients who were 60 years of age or younger. Anthony E Kincaid, PT, PhD Creighton University Omaha, Neb |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion