Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,792,997 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Torres v. Corrections Corp. of America.


U.S. District Court

EXHAUSTION

PLRA PLRA Partido Liberal Radical Autentico (Paraguay)
PLRA Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995
 -- Prisoner Litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
 Reform Act

Torres v. Corrections Corp. of America, 372 F.Supp.2d 1258 (N.D.Okla. 2005). A state prison inmate INMATE. One who dwells in a part of another's house, the latter dwelling, at the same time, in the said house. Kitch. 45, b; Com. Dig. Justices of the Peace, B 85; 1 B. & Cr. 578; 8 E. C. L. R. 153; 2 Dowl. & Ry. 743; 8 B. & Cr. 71; 15 E. C. L. R. 154; 2 Man. & Ry. 227; 9 B. & Cr.  who was assaulted and battered by a prison officer brought a [section] 1983 action in state court against the corporate administrator of the prison, and also asserted a negligence claim. The district court dismissed the case in part and denied dismissal in part. The court held that the inmate's [section] 1983 claims were subject to the exhaustion requirements of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). The court held that the inmate's state law claim of negligence against the corporate administrator of the prison did not fall within the ambit of PLRA's exhaustion of administrative remedies provision. (David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center, Oklahoma, operated by Corrections Corporation of America Corrections Corporation of America (NYSE: CXW) (CCA) is a company that manages public prisons and other facilities[1], and has concessions for many others. The company had annual revenues in 2004 of $1.15 billion USD. )
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:138
Previous Article:Thomsen v. Ross.(Thomsen v. Ross, 368 F.Supp.2d 961)(Brief Article)
Next Article:U.S. v. Basciano.(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
DEMOCRATS BEGIN 3-DAY CONVENTION, PUSHING DAVIS CANDIDACY.(News)
HOUSE OF WORSHIP DEEMED UNSAFE : LATINO CHURCH FAILS SIMI CODE INSPECTION.(NEWS)
PRIVATE COMPANIES LINING UP TO OPERATE CLOSED COUNTY JAILS.(NEWS)
PUBLIC FORUM : ENGLISH-ONLY INSTRUCTION IS SOUND POLICY.(EDITORIAL)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
Americans United, allies oppose `faith-based' funding in Wisconsin case. (People & Events).(Brief Article)
New luxury coach maker launched.(Business)(A Coburg start-up called Legacy will have an initial payroll of about 30 workers)
... But do we want to be?(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)
Torres v. Corrections Corp. of America.(Torres v. Corrections Corp. of America, 372 F.Supp.2d 1258, Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996)(Brief...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles