Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,651,959 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Tips for making writing easier: Part 7: simplifying a convoluted draft: most convoluted drafts can be improved by going for the simple word, breaking up complex sentences, and turning some passive constructions into active voice.


Last month, we looked at ways to tone up a chatty chat·ty  
adj. chat·ti·er, chat·ti·est
1. Inclined to chat; friendly and talkative.

2. Full of or in the style of light informal talk: a chatty letter.
 or sloppy slop·py  
adj. slop·pi·er, slop·pi·est
1. Marked by a lack of neatness or order; untidy: a sloppy room.

2.
 draft to make it more precise and professional. But your problem may be the opposite: your first drafts may tend to be convoluted convoluted /con·vo·lut·ed/ (kon?vo-lldbomact´ed) rolled together or coiled. , with overly fancy words and complex, long sentences that are hard to read. In this column, we will look at three simple ways to fix such common problems.

SIMPLE WORDS

One easy way to make your piece shorter and more energetic is to replace long, Latin-based words such cognizant cog·ni·zant  
adj.
Fully informed; conscious. See Synonyms at aware.



[From cognizance.]

Adj. 1.
 or possess with shorter, simpler ones such aware or have. Here are some other stuffy expressions and their simpler versions:

* a sufficient number of (enough)

* afford an opportunity to (allow)

* in reference to (about)

* provide a means whereby (enable)

* pursuant to these guidelines guidelines,
n.pl a set of standards, criteria, or specifications to be used or followed in the performance of certain tasks.
 (under these guidelines)

* remunerate/remuneration (pay)

* render assistance to (help, assist)

Some of your fancy words may also invite misunderstanding. For instance, exceptionable ex·cep·tion·a·ble  
adj.
Open or liable to objection or debate; objectionable or debatable.



ex·cep
 means objectionable, and is not to be confused with exceptional (= out of the ordinary). Since readers may not know the difference, it's best to stay clear of such dangerous words altogether.

SIMPLE SENTENCE CONSTRUCTIONS

Take a look at your sentences. Do many haw more than two clauses or span more than two lines? Then break up some of them--at least those with more than one thought. Here is an example:
   Visual and miscroscopy inspections on the samples,
   which were coated with three coats of Formulation I
   and dried in an IR oven at 300[degrees]F after each coating,
   indicated that samples 1-6 had very good surface quality,
   and they also passed the tape adhesion test, while
   gloss was somewhat lower than in the control sample.


This sentence boasts four clauses and several thoughts. to You might break it up into three sentences:
   Visual and microscopic inspections of the samples
   showed that samples 1-6 had very good surface quality
   but somewhat lower gloss than the control sample.
   They also passed the tape adhesion test. These samples
   had been given three coats of Formulation 1 and were
   dried in an IR oven at 300[degrees]F after each coating.


ACTIVE VERBS etc. See Active, Auxiliary, Neuter, etc.

See also: Verb
 

One weakness in almost all business writing is overuse overuse Health care The common use of a particular intervention even when the benefits of the intervention don't justify the potential harm or cost–eg, prescribing antibiotics for a probable viral URI. Cf Misuse, Underuse.  of the passive voice, as in
   The study, which had been requested by management
   a year ago, was completed by the team in late May.


Simply state who does what (active voice) rather than what was done (passive), unless knowing the agent is of no interest to the reader. It cuts out words and avoids many grammar errors introduced by the passive voice. The example then becomes
   The team completed the study, which management
   had requested a year ago, in late May.


Similarly, the 14-word passive sentence
   It is recommended that this matter be brought up at
   the next safety meeting.


becomes the clearer 11-word active sentence
   We recommend taking up this matter at the next team
   meeting.


Your readers will thank you!

Cheryl and Peter Reimold have been teaching communication skills to engineers, scientist, and businesspeople for 20 years. Their firm, PERC PERC

See: Preferred equity redemption stock
 Communications (telephone +1 914-725-1024, e-mail perccom@aol.com), offers businesses consulting and writing services, as well as customized in-house In-house

In the context of general equities, keeping an activity within the firm. For example, rather than go to the marketplace and sell a security for a client to anyone, an attempt is made to find a buyer to complete the transaction with the firm.
 courses on writing, presentation skills, and on-the-job communication skills. Visit their website at www.allaboutcommunication.com.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Paper Industry Management Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:The Language of Business
Author:Reimold, Peter
Publication:Solutions - for People, Processes and Paper
Date:Jul 1, 2003
Words:538
Previous Article:Calendar of events.
Next Article:What's on your report card?(Viewpoint)



Related Articles
Scientific English: A Guide for Scientists and Other Professionals.
Using the Flowers paradigm to write more efficiently.
Writing in plain English. (writing principles for accountants)
Seventh and ninth grade writing exercises: candy, biographies, and E-prime.(Education)(writing and speaking English without employing the verb to be)
Readable Writing by Scientists and Researchers.
The danger of passivity. (Language Teaching & Learning).
The art of editing yourself. (Symposium Secrets to Stronger Editorials).
Tips for making writing easier: part 6: toning up chatty or sloppy prose.(The Language of Business)
Being part of the solution: Part 2: guidance vs. criticism: intensive guidance ultimately saves you time and effort.(The Language of Business)
Writing tighter for online prospects, using Prof. Lanham's Lard Factor.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles