Thirty-second selected bibliography on computers, technology and the law.(January January: see month. 1999 through December December: see month. 1999) INTRODUCTION Each year, the Journal provides a compilation Compiling a program. See compiler. of the most important and timely legal articles on computers, technology, and the Internet Internet Publicly accessible computer network connecting many smaller networks from around the world. It grew out of a U.S. Defense Department program called ARPANET (Advanced Research Projects Agency Network), established in 1969 with connections between computers at the . The Bibliography bibliography. The listing of books is of ancient origin. Lists of clay tablets have been found at Nineveh and elsewhere; the library at Alexandria had subject lists of its books. , indexed by subject matter, is designed to be a research guide to assist our readers in searching for recent articles on computer and technology law. This year's annual Bibliography contains nearly 1000 articles, found through the examination of over 800 periodicals. The Bibliography aims to include topics on every legal aspect of computers and technology. However, as new issues in this field emerge, we welcome your suggestions for additional topics and sources, as well as your commentary on the Bibliography. INDEX
1. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN LAW PRACTICE
1.0 General
1.1 Computerized Legal Research
1.1.0 General
1.1.1 Online Legal Research
1.1.2 Legal Research Using CD-ROM
1.2 Law Office Management
1.2.0 General
1.2.1 Office Automation
1.2.2 Case Management
1.2.3 Case File Security
1.2.4 Internet Access
1.3 Selected Uses in the Law Practice
1.3.0 General
1.3.1 Tax Filing
1.3.2 Bankruptcy
1.3.3 Estate Planning
1.3.4 Real Estate
2. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN LITIGATION
2.0 General
2.1 Scientific Evidence
2.1.0 General
2.1.1 Expert Testimony
2.1.2 DNA Typing
2.1.3 Fingerprint
2.1.4 Polygraph
2.1.5 Forensic Evidence
2.2 Demonstrative Evidence
2.2.0 General
2.2.1 Computer-Generated Evidence
2.2.2 Audio/Visual Evidence
2.3 Cameras in the Courtroom
2.4 Dispute Resolution
3. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN THE GOVERNMENT
3.0 General
3.1 Computers and Technology in Law Enforcement
3.1.0 General
3.1.1 Computers and Technology in Police Operation
3.1.2 Computers and Technology in Correctional Institutions
3.2 Use of Computers and Technology by Federal Departments
and Agencies
3.2.0 General
3.2.1 Military Technology
3.2.2 Internal Revenue Service
3.2.3 U.S. Patent Office
3.2.4 Government Information Retrieval System
3.3 Use of Computers and Technology in Judicial
Administration
3.4 Use of Computers and Technology by State and Federal
Legislatures
4. LEGAL ISSUES OF COMPUTER AND TECHNOLOGY SALES, USAGE,
AND SERVICES
4.0 General
4.1 Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Computer Services
4.1.0 General
4.1.1 Purchase, Lease and License Considerations
4.1.2 Limitations of Limited Warranties
4.2 Government Regulation of Computer-Related Industry
4.2.0 General
4.2.1 First Amendment Issues
4.2.2 Antitrust
4.2.3 FCC Regulation
4.2.4 SEC Regulation
4.2.5 Tariff and Trade Control
4.3 Substantive Law Aspects
4.3.0 General
4.3.1 Computer Crime
4.3.2 Computer-Related Product Liability
4.3.3 Computer Security
4.3.4 Taxation of Software
4.4 Problems of Privacy and Computers
4.4.0 General
4.4.1 Data Privacy
4.4.2 Governmental Invasion of Privacy
4.4.3 Credit Reference
5. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION
5.0 General
5.1 Legal Education
6. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN BUSINESS
6.0 General
6.1 Electronic Commerce
6.2 Computers in Banking and Finance
6.2.0 General
6.2.1 On-line Securities Trading
6.3 Computers and Technology in the Transportation Industry
6.4 Computers and Technology in the Publishing Industry
6.5 Computers and Technology in Advertising
7. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION OF COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY
7.0 General
7.1 Patent
7.1.0 General
7.1.1 Software Patent
7.1.2 Biotech Patent
7.2 Software Copyright
7.2.0 General
7.2.1 User Interface
7.2.2 Fair Use
7.2.3 Video Game
7.3 Digital Copyright
7.3.0 General
7.3.1 Electronic Compilation
7.3.2 Computer Database
7.3.3 Multimedia
7.3.4 Computer-Generated Works
7.4 Trademark
7.5 Trade Secret
7.6 Semiconductor Chip Protection
7.7 Licensing
7.8 Intellectual Property Issues of the Internet
7.9 International Developments
7.9.0 General
7.9.1 GATT-TRIPS
7.9.2 NAFTA
7.9.3 Developments in Canada
7.9.4 Developments in Mexico and Latin America
7.9.5 Developments in Australia and New Zealand
7.9.6 Developments in Africa
7.9.7 Developments in Asia
7.9.8 Developments in Western Europe
7.9.9 Developments in Eastern Europe and Russia
8. COMPUTERS AND LEGAL REASONING
8.0 General
8.1 Artificial Intelligence
9. LEGAL ISSUES OF THE INTERNET
9.0 General
9.1 ISP and Internet Access
9.2 Domain Names
9.3 Taxation of Electronic Commerce
9.4 Encryption and Digital Signatures
9.5 Internet Crime
9.6 Civil Procedure in Cyberspace
10. LAW AND TECHNOLOGY
10.0 General
10.1 Technology Transfer
10.2 Audio/Video Recording
10.3 Space Law
10.4 Medical Technology
10.5 Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals
10.6 Environmental Law
10.6.0 General
10.6.1 Pollution
10.6.2 Hazardous Substances
10.6.3 Electromagnetic Fields
10.6.4 Nuclear Technology
10.6.5 Energy and the Environment
10.6.6 International Environmental Law Developments
10.7 Television
10.7.0 General
10.7.1 Satellite Television
10.7.2 Cable Television
10.8 Telecommunications
10.8.0 General
10.8.1 Telephone
10.8.2 Multimedia in Telecommunications
10.8.3 International Telecommunications Developments
11. OTHERS
11.0 General
11.1 Y2K Issues
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN LAW PRACTICE
1.0 General
Allison Standfield, Dinosaurs to Dynamos: Has the Law
Reached its Technological Age, 21 UNSWLJ 530
(1998).
Graham Walker, Computers and Legal Aid Work, J.L.
SOC'Y SCOT., Aug. 1999, at 43.
1.1 Computerized Legal Research
1.1.0 General
E. Pietrosant & B. Graziadio, Advanced Techniques for
Legal Document Processing and Retrieval, 7 ART.
INTELL. & L. 341 (1999).
1.1.1 Online Legal Research
A. Darby Dickerson, Ethics on the Web: An Annotated
Bibliography of Legal Ethics Material on the Internet,
28 STETSON L. REV. 369 (1998).
1.1.2 Legal Research Using CD-ROM
1.2 Law Office Management
1.2.0 General
Drew L. Kershen, Professional Legal Organizations on
the Internet: Web Sites and Ethics, 4 DRAKE J. AGRIC.
L. 1 (1999).
1.2.1 Office Automation
1.2.2 Case Management
Roger Mackenzie, The Interview: Stephen Gold, J.L.
SOC'Y SCOT., Mar. 1999, at 34.
1.2.3 Case File Security
1.2.4 Interact Access
Laurann Sage, Mainstream Louden v. Board of
Trustees: Restricting Internet Access in Public
Libraries, 67 UMKC L. REV. 731 (1999).
1.3 Selected Uses in the Law Practice
1.3.0 General
1.3.1 Tax Filing
1.3.2 Bankruptcy
1.3.3 Estate Planning
1.3.4 Real Estate
Dale A. Whitman, Digital Recording of Real Estate
Conveyances, 32 J. MARSHALL L. REV. 227 (1999).
2. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN LITIGATION
2.0 General
Michael J. Brady, The World Wide Web and the New
World of Litigation: A Basic Introduction, 66 DEFENSE
COUNSEL J. 497 (1999).
K. Isaac de Vyver, Comment, Opening the Door But
Keeping the Lights Off: Kuhmo Tire Co. v. Carmichael
and the Applicability of the Daubert Test to
Nonscientific Evidence, 50 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 177
(1999).
Todd H. Flaming & Benson K. Friedman, 1998 Survey
of Legal Technology, 23 S. ILL. U. L.J. 1183 (1999).
Samuel A. Guiberson, Technology and Advocacy in the
New Technology Courtroom, 28 SW. U. L. REV. 405
(1999).
Malcom Lader, The Influence of Drugs Upon
Testimony, 39 MED., SCI. & L. 99 (1999).
Fredric I. Lederer, The Road to the Virtual Courtroom?
A Consideration of Today's -- and Tomorrow's -- High
Technology Courtrooms, 50 S.C. L. REV. 799 (1999).
2.1 Scientific Evidence
2.1.1 General
Gary Edmond, Science, Law and Narrative: Helping the
`Facts' to Speak for Themselves, 23 S. ILL. U. L.J. 555
(1999).
Louis A. Jacobs, Giving Life to Antiquated Notions
About Scientific Evidence, 22 AM. J. TRIAL ADVOC. 507
(1999).
Randolph N. Jonckait, The Standard of Appellate
Review for Scientific Evidence: Beyond Joiner and
Scheffer, 32 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 289 (1999).
Honorable Janine M. Kern & Scott R. Swier, Daubert v.
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: "Gatekeeping" or
Industry "Safekeeping"?, 43 S.D.L. REV. 566 (1998).
Thomas H. Neuckranz & Bradley C. Nahrstadt, Refuting
Diagnostic and Neuropsychological Testing in Toxic
Tort Cases, 23 AM. J. TRIAL ADVOC. 19 (1999).
James E. Starrs, There's Something About Novel
Scientific Evidence, 28 SW. U. L. REV. 417 (1999).
2.1.2 Expert Testimony
Liam Donaldson et al., The Medial Expert Witness:
Time to Regulate Conflicts of Interest, 39 MED., SCI. &
L. 11 (1999).
Marilee M. Kapsa & Carl B. Meyer, Scientific Experts:
Making Their Testimony More Reliable, 35 CAL. W. L.
REV. 313 (1999).
Brian Manarin, Assessing the Expert: A Call for
Reciprocal Disclosure in Canada, 39 MED., SCI. & L.
17 (1999).
Alan A. Stone, The Forensic Psychiatrist As Expert
Witness in Malpractice Cases, 27 AM. ACAD.
PSYCHIATRY & L. 451 (1999).
Richard T. Stillwell, Monitoring the Opinions of
Biochemists and Beekeepers: The Application of
Daubert & Robinson to Engineering Witnesses in Texas,
BAYLOR L. REV., Winter 1999, at 95.
2.1.2 DNA Typing
Ilene Sherwyn Cooper, Advances in DNA Techniques
Present Opportunity to Amend EPTL to Permit
Paternity Testing, N.Y. ST. B.J., July/August 1999, at
34.
Jonathan W. Diehl, Note, Drafting a Fair DNA
Exception to the Statute of Limitations in Sexual Assault
Cases, 39 JURIMETRICS J. 431 (1999).
Marcia Johnson, Genetic Technology and Its Impact on
Culpability for Criminal Actions, 46 CLEV. ST. L. REV.
443 (1998).
Eric T. Juengst, I-DNA-fication, Personal Privacy, and
Social Justice, 75 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 61 (1999).
Trevor R. McDonald, Note, Genetic Justice: DNA
Evidence and the Criminal Law in Canada, 26 MAN.
L.J. 1 (1998).
Andreas Oser, Patenting (Partial) Gene Sequences
Taking Particular Account of the EST Issue, 30 INT'L
REV. INDUS. PROP. & COPYRIGHT L. 1 (1999).
Bob John Robinson, Why an Acceptable Cloning Policy
Will be Hard to Achieve, 13 NOTRE DAME J.L. ETHICS
& PUB. POL'Y 9 (1999).
2.1.3 Fingerprint
2.1.4 Polygraph
Sheila K. Hyatt, Developments in the Law of Scientific
Evidence: The Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence, 28
J. NAT'L ASS'N ADMIN. L. JUDGES 171 (1998).
2.1.5 Forensic Evidence
Anthony Busuttil, Lockerbie and Dunblane: Disasters
and Dilemmas, 66 MEDICO-LEGAL J. 126 (1999).
Malcolm B. Stoney & Timothy D. Koelmeyer, Facial
Reconstruction: A Case Report and Review of
Development of Techniques, 39 MED., SCI. & L. 49
(1999).
2.2 Demonstrative Evidence
2.2.0 General
Lisa A. Dolak, Patents Without Paper: Proving a Date
of Invention with Electronic Evidence, 36 HOUS. L.
REV. 471 (1999).
Fredric I. Lederer, Some Thoughts on the Evidentiary
Aspects of Technologically Presented or Produced
Evidence, 28 SW. U. L. REV. 389 (1999).
2.2.1 Computer-Generated Evidence
Robert B. Bennett, Jr. et al., Seeing Is Believing; Or Is
It? An Empirical Study of Computer Simulations as
Evidence, 34 WAKE FOREST L. REV. 257 (1999).
Karen D. Butera, Seeing is Believing: A Practitioner's
Guide to the Admissibility of Demonstrative Computer
Evidence, 46 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 511 (1998).
James E. Carbine & Lynn McLain, Proposed Model
Rules Governing the Admission of Computer-Generated
Evidence, 15 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH.
L.J. 1 (1998).
Gyong Ho Kim & Anna R. Paddon, Digital
Manipulation As New Form of Evidence of Actual
Malice in Libel and False Light Cases, COMM. & L.,
Sept. 1999, at 57.
Mary Moreland & Steward Nazzaro, Admitting Scanned
Reproductions into Evidence, 18 REV. OF LIT. 261
(1999).
Linda C. Morell, New Technology: Experimental
Research on the Influence of Computer-Animated
Display on Jurors, 28 SW. U. L. REV. 411 (1999).
Christopher Nicholl, Should Computers be Trusted?
Hearsay and Authentication with Special Reference to
Electronic Commerce, 1999 J. BUS. L., at 332.
2.2.2 Audio/Visual Evidence
Lori G. Baer & Christofer A. Riley, Technology in the
Courtroom: Computerized Exhibits and How to Present
Them, 66 DEF. COUNS. J. 176 (1999).
Libby Bishop & David I. Levine, Computer-Mediated
Communications as Employee Voice: A Case Study, 52
INDUS. & LAB. REL. REV. 213 (1999).
Ray Bull & Brian R. Clifford, Earwitness Testimony, 39
MED., SCI. & L. 120 (1999).
Elizabeth J.M. Strobel, Note, Play it Again, Counsel:
The Admission of Videotaped Interviews in Prosecutions
for Criminal Sexual Assault of a Child, 30 LOY. U. CHI.
L.J. 305 (1999).
Sherrie L. Wilson, A Proposal for Media Access to
Audiotapes and Videotapes Presented During Trials,
COMM. & L., Mar. 1999, at 45.
2.3 Cameras in the Courtroom
Michael Comisky, Not Guilty: The News Media in the
Supreme Court Confirmation Process, J.L. & POL.,
Winter 1999, at 1.
2.4 Dispute Resolution
Llewellyn Joseph Gibbons, Rusticum Judicium ? Private
"Courts" Enforcing Private Law and Public Rights:
Regulating Virtual Arbitration in Cyberspace, 24 OHIO
N.U.L. REV. 769 (1998).
Veijo Heiskanen, Dispute Resolution in International
Electronic Commerce, 16 J. INT'L ARB., Sept. 1999, at
29.
John Arter Jackson, Managing and Resolving Legal
Issues in Technology: A Report from the Albany Law
School Science and Technology Law Center Project, 9
ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 317 (1999).
Catherine Kessedjian & Sandrine Cahn, Dispute
Resolution On-Line, 32 INT'L LAW. 977 (1998).
Erik Wilburs, On-Line Arbitration of Electronic
Commerce Disputes, 27 INT'L BUS. LAW. 273 (1999).
3. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN THE GOVERNMENT
3.0 General
A. Michael Froomkin, On Government and
Governance, 14 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 617 (1999).
Diane E. Horvath & John S. Jung, 1999 Technology
Legislation in Virginia, 33 U. RICH. L. REV. 1037
(1999).
J. Marilyn Henry, Electronic Communications: A
Necessity for Local Agencies, 56 J. HOUSING &
COMMUN. DEV., March/April 1999, at 15.
Brian A. Persico, Comment, Under Siege: The
Jurisdictional and Interagency Problems of Protecting
the National Information Infrastructure, 7 COMM. L.
CONSPECTUS 153 (1999).
3.1 Computers and Technology in Law Enforcement
3.1.0 General
George M. Dery III, The Loss of Privacy is Just a
Heartbeat Away: An Exploration of Government
Heartbeat Detection Technology and Its Impact on
Fourth Amendment Protections, 7 WM. & MARY BILL
RTS. J. 401 (1999).
Janet Reno, Justice and Public Safety in the Twenty-First
Century, 30 MCGEORGE L. REV. 5 (1998).
Martha A. Sabol, The Identity Theft and Assumption
Deterrence Act of 1998 -- Do Individual Victims Finally
Get Their Day in Court?, 11 LOY. CONSUMER L. REV.
165 (1999).
3.1.1 Computers and Technology in Police Operation
Steven Salvador Flores, Note, Gun Detector Technology
and the Special Needs Exception, 25 RUTGERS
COMPUTER & TECH. L.J. 135 (1999).
D. Honeybourne et al., A Study to Investigate the Ability
of Subjects with Chronic Lung Diseases to Activate the
Roadside Lion Alcolmeter SL-400, 39 MED., SCI. & L.
337 (1999).
3.1.2 Computers and Technology in Correctional
Institutions
3.2 Use of Computers and Technology by Federal Agencies
and Departments
3.2.0 General
Captain Theresa A. Bruno, The Deployment Will, 47
A.F.L. REV. 211 (1999).
Richard M. Devens, On-Line Publishing at the Bureau
of Labor Statistics, 38 INDUS. REL. J. OF ECON. &
SOC'Y 446 (1999).
Veling W. Tsai, Cheaper and Better: The
Congressional Administrative Simplification Mandate
Facilitates the Transition to Electronic Medical
Records, 19 J. LEGAL MED. 549 (1998).
3.2.1 Military Technology
David Edward Grogan, Power Play: Theater Ballistic
Missile Defense, National Ballistic Missile Defense and
the ABM Treaty, 39 VA. J. INT'L L. 799 (1999).
Vally Koubi, Military Technology Races, 53 INT'L ORG.
537 (1999).
D.G. Stephens & M.D. Fitzpatrick, Legal Aspects of
Contemporary Naval Mine Warfare, 21 LOY. L.A. INT'L
& COMP. L.J. 553 (1999).
3.2.2 Internal Revenue Service
3.2.3 U.S. Patent Office
3.2.4 Government Information Retrieval System
Martin E. Halstuck, Bits, Bytes, and the Right to Know:
How the Electronic Freedom of Information Act Holds
the Key to Public Access to a Wealth of Government
Databases, 15 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH
TECH. L.J. 73 (1998).
3.3 Use of Computers and Technology in Judicial
Administration
L. Karl Branting et al., Automating Judicial Document
Drafting: A Discourse-Based Approach, 6 ART. INTELL.
& L. 111 (1998).
Paul R. Michel, The Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit Must Evolve to Meet the Challenges Ahead, 48
AM. U. L. REV. 1177 (1999).
L.D.M. Nokes et al., Biomechanics of Judicial Hanging:
A Case Report, 39 MED., SCI. & L. 61 (1999).
Uri J. Schild, Criminal Sentencing and Intelligent
Decision Support, 6 ART. INTELL. & L. 151 (1998).
Andrew Stranieri et al., A Hybrid Rule Neural
Approach for the Automation of Legal Reasoning in the
Discretionary Domain of Family Law in Australia, 7
ART. INTELL. & L. 153 (1999).
Michele Taruffo, Comment, Judicial Decisions and
Artificial Intelligence, 6 ART. INTELL. & L. 311 (1999).
Cyrus Tata, The Application of Judicial Intelligence and
`Rules' to Systems Supporting Discretionary Judicial
Decision-Making, 6 ART. INTELL. & L. 203 (1998).
3.4 Use of Computers and Technology by State and Federal
Legislatures
4. LEGAL ISSUES OF COMPUTER AND TECHNOLOGY SALES, USAGE,
AND SERVICES
4.0 General
Steve Bickerstaff, Shackles on the Giant: How the
Federal Government created Microsoft, Personal
Computers, and the Internet, TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 1
(1999).
Vickie S. Byrd, Note, "Reno v. ACLU"--A Lesson in
Juridical Impropriety, 42 HOW. L.J. 356 (1999).
Jane Kaufman Winn, Clash of the Titans, Regulating the
Competition between Established and Emerging
Electronic Payment Systems, 14 BERKELEY TECH. L.J.
675 (1999).
4.1 Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Computer
Services
4.1.0 General
4.1.1 Purchase, Lease and License Considerations
Michael P. Akemann, Microsoft's Licensing
Agreements: Theory and Evidence on the Sale of MSDOS
and Windows, 24 J. CORP. L. 553 (1999).
4.1.2 Limitations of Limited Warranties
4.1 Government Regulation of the Internet and
Computer-Related Industry
4.2.0 General
Lisa Austin, Law & the Internet: Regulating
Cyberspace, 49 U. TORONTO L.J. 305 (1999) (book
review).
Patrick Birkinshaw & Nicholas Parry, The End of the
Beginning? The Freedom of Information Bill 1999, 26
J.L. & SOC'Y 538 (1999).
David Church et al., Recent Developments Regarding
U.S. and EU Regulation of Electronic Commerce, 33
INT'L LAW. 347 (1999).
Timothy Coughlan, Note, Applying the U.S. Postal
Service Statutes to E-Mail Transmissions, 25 RUTGERS
COMPUTER & TECH. L.J. 375 (1999).
James E. Gaylord, Note, State Regulatory Jurisdiction
and the Internet: Letting the Dormant Commerce
Clause Lie, 52 VAND. L. REV. 1095 (1999).
Ronald J. Gilson, The Legal Infrastructure of High
Technology Industrial Districts: Silicon Valley, Route
128, And Covenants Not to Compete, 74 N.Y.U. L. REV.
575 (1999).
Jack L. Goldsmith, What Internet Gambling Legislation
Teaches About Internet Regulation, 32 INT'L LAW. 1115
(1998).
Jennifer M. Kappel, Government Intervention on the
Internet: Should the Federal Trade Commission
Regulate Unsolicited E-Mail Advertising?, 51 ADMIN.
L. REV. 1011 (1999).
Mark A. Lemley, Standardizing Government Standard-Setting
Policy for Electronic Commerce, 14 BERKELEY
TECH. L.J. 746 (1999).
Lawrence Lessig, The Limits in Open Code: Regulatory
Standards and the Future of the Net, 14 BERKELEY
TECH. L.J. 760 (1999).
Paul K. Ohm, On Regulating the Internet Usenet: A
Case Study, 46 UCLA L. REV. 1941 (1999).
Chris Reed, Controlling World Wide Web Links:
Property Rights, Access Rights and Unfair Competition,
6 IND. J. GLOBAL LEGAL STUD. 167 (1998).
Charles R. Topping, Article, The Surf Is Up, But Who
Owns the Beach?-Who Should Regulate Commerce on
the Internet?, 13 NOTRE DAME J.L. ETHICS & PUB.
POL'Y 179 (1999).
George B. Trubow, Regulating Transactions on the
Internet, 24 OHIO N.U. L. REV. 831 (1998).
Christian R. White, Comment, Decrypting the Politics:
Why the Clinton Administration's National
Cryptography Policy Will Continue to Be Dictated by
National Economic Interest, 7 COMM. L. CONSPECTUS
193 (1999).
4.2.1 First Amendment Issues
Ray August, Gratis Dictum! The Limits of Academic
Free Speech on the Internet, 10 U. FLA. J.L. & PUB.
POL'Y 27 (1998).
G. Chris Bernard, The Child Online Protection Act: Can
the COPA Cope with Constitutional Scrutiny in Light of
Reno v. ACLU?, 45 WAYNE L. REV. 1665 (1999).
Clay Calvert, The Voyeurism Value in First Amendment
Jurisprudence, 17 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 273
(1999).
Clay Calvert & Robert D. Richards, New Millennium,
Same Old Speech: Technology Changes, But the First
Amendment Issues Don't 79 B.U. L. REV. 779 (1999).
April Bailey Cole, Note, Indecency on the Internet: Law
and the Communications Decency Act of 1996, 27 CAP.
U. L. REV. 607 (1998).
Steven M. Cordero, Damnum Absque Injuria: Zeran v.
AOL & Cyberspace Defamation Law, 9 FORDHAM
INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 625 (1999).
Kelly M. Doherty, WWW.Obscenity.com: An Analysis of
Obscenity and Indecency Regulation on the Internet, 32
AKRON L. REV 259 (1999).
Walter J. Dorgan III, The Cyberworld Cannot be
Confined to Speech that Would be Suitable for a
Sandbox, 29 SETON HALL L. REV. 286 (1998).
Alamdar S. Hamdani, Comment, Technological
Convergence--"A Multiplicity of Sources," 36 HOUS. L.
REV. 321 (1999).
Lori Johnson, Comment, Reno v. American Civil
Liberties Union: The First Amendment Balance of a
Child's Morality and an Adult's Naughty Net Play, 25
RUTGERS COMPUTER & TECH. L.J. 157 (1999).
Natalie A. Kaniel, Loving v. Boren, 14 BERKELEY
TECH. L.J. 371 (1999).
Mark S. Kende, Lost in Cyberspace: The Judiciary's
Distracted Application of Free Speech and Personal
Jurisdiction Doctrines to the Internet, 77 OR. L. REV.
1125 (1998).
Matthew Thomas Kline, Mainstream Loudoun v. Board
of Trustees of the Loudoun County Library, 14
BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 348 (1999).
Jason Edward Lavender, Note, "Tobacco is a Filthy
Weed and From the Devil Doth Proceed": A Study of
the Government's Efforts to Regulate Smoking on the
Silver Screen, 21 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L.J. 205
(1998).
Lydia W. Lee, Child Pornography Prevention Act of
1996: Confronting the Challenges of Virtual Reality, 8
S. CAL. INTERDISC. L.J. 639 (1999).
John F. McGuire, Note, When Speech Is Heard Around
the World: Internet Content Regulation in the United
States and Germany, 74 N.Y.U. L. REV. 750 (1999).
Michael J. Merchant, Comment, Establishing the
Boundaries of First Amendment Protection for Speech
in the Cyberspace Frontier: Reno v. ACLU, 5 VILL.
SPORTS & ENT. L.J. 429 (1998).
Heather L. Miller, Strike Two: An Analysis of the Child
Online Protection Act's Constitutional Failures, 52 FED.
COMM. L.J. 155 (1999).
Robert D. Richards & Clay Calvert, The "True Threat"
to Cyberspace: Shredding the First Amendment for
Faceless Fears, 7 COMM. L. CONSPECTUS 291 (1999).
Marc Rohr, Can Congress Regulate "Indecent" Speech
on the Internet?, 23 NOVA L. REV. 709 (1999).
Michael L. Siegel, Hate Speech, Civil Rights, and the
Internet: The Jurisdictional and Human Rights
Nightmare, 9 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 375 (1999).
Brenda M. Simon, United States v. Hilton, 14
BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 385 (1999).
Sanjiv N. Singh, Cyberspace: A Blew Frontier for
Fighting Words, 25 RUTGERS COMPUTER & TECH. L.J.
283 (1999).
Marcy Cohen Turner, Regulating Internet Pornography:
Should Parents or the Government Be in Control?,
CHILDREN'S LEGAL RTS. J., Summer 1999, at 48.
Rachel Weintraub-Reitter, Note, Hate Speech Over the
Internet: A Traditional Constitutional Analysis or a
New Cyber Constitution, 8 B.U. PUB. INT. L.J. 145
(1998).
Gretchen Witte, Comment, Internet Indecency and
Impressionable Minds, 44 VILL. L. REV. 745 (1999).
Noah D. Zatz, Note, Sidewalks in Cyberspace: Making
Space for Public Forums in the Electronic Environment,
12 HARV. J.L. & TECH. 149 (1998).
4.2.2 Antitrust
James C. Burling, The Antitrust Duty to Deal and
Intellectual Property Rights, 24 J. CORP. L. 527 (1999).
Michael Woodrow De Vries, United States v. Microsoft,
14 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 303 (1999).
Albert A. Foer, The Importance of the Microsoft Case,
31 CONN. L. REV. 1275 (1999).
Jon M. Garon, Media & Monopoly in the Information
Age: Slowing the Convergence at the Marketplace of
Ideas, 17 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 491 (1999).
Daniel J. Gifford, Java and Microsoft: How Does the
Antitrust Story Unfold?, 44 VILL. L. REV. 67 (1999).
Norman W. Hawker, Consistently Wrong: The Single
Product Issue and the Tying Claims Against Microsoft,
35 CAL. W. L. REV. 1 (1998).
Norman W. Hawker, Open Windows: The Essential
Facilities Doctrine and Microsoft, 25 OHIO N.U. L.
REV. 115 (1999).
William E. Kovacic, Designing Antitrust Remedies for
Dominant Firm Misconduct, 31 CONN. L. REV. 1285
(1999).
Robert M. Langer, Symposium Introduction: United
States v. Microsoft, 31 CONN. L. REV. 1245 (1999).
Robert A. Levy, Microsoft and the Browser Wars, 31
CONN. L. REV. 1321 (1999).
David McGowan, Networks and Intention in Antirust
and Intellectual Property, 24 J. CORP. L. 485 (1999).
Wendy Milanese, Comment, The Tension Must Break:
The Irreconcilable Interplay Between Antitrust Defenses
to Infringement and Protection of Standardized
Software Development Tools, 15 SANTA CLARA
COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 407 (1999).
Leonard Orland, Teaching Antitrust During Microsoft,
31 CONN. L. REV. 1375 (1999).
William H. Page & John E. Lopatka, The Dubious
Search for "Integration" in the Microsoft Trial, 31
CONN. L. REV. 1251 (1999).
Jennifer J. Stearman, Disco Vision Associates v. Disc
Manufacturing Inc., Alleging Monopolization, Patent
Tying and Market Allocation in the Compact Disc
Technology Market: Surviving a Motion to Dismiss, 6
U. BALT. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 89 (1997).
Jonathan Zittrain, The Un-Microsoft Un-Remedy: Law
Can Prevent the Problem that It Can't Patch Later, 31
CONN. L. REV. 1361 (1999).
4.2.3 FCC Regulation
William C. Beckwith, Comment, Cutting the Cord:
Removing the CMRS Spectrum Cap to Promote
Wireless-Landline Convergence and Wireless
Alternatives in the Local Loop, 7 COMM. L.
CONSPECTUS 369 (1999).
John Allen Hendricks, The Telecommunications Act of
1996: Its Impact on the Electronic Media of the 21st
Century, COMM. & L., June 1999, at 39.
Leonard J. Kennedy & Lori A. Zallaps, If It Ain't
Broke ... The FCC and Internet Regulation, 7 COMM.
L. CONSPECTUS 17 (1999).
Erwin G. Krasnow & M. Wayne Milstead, FCC
Regulation and Other Oxymorons Revisited, MEDIA L.
& POL'Y, Spring 1999, at 7.
Laura Lakin McDaniels, Southwestern Bell v. FCC, 14
BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 422 (1999).
Stephen F. Varholy, Comment, Preserving the Public
Interest: A Topical Analysis of Cable/DBS
Crossownership in the Rulemaking for the Direct
Broadcast Satellite Service, 7 COMM. L. CONSPECTUS
173 (1999).
4.2.4 SEC Regulation
Paul D. Cohen, Securities Trading Via the Internet,
1999 J. Bus. L. 299.
Vernon J. Richardson & Susan Scholz, Corporate Web
Site Disclosure and Rule 10B-5: An Empirical
Evaluation, 36 AM. BUS. L.J. 531 (1999).
Andrew R. Thompson, Note, Taming the Frontier?: An
Evaluation of the SEC's Regulation of Internet
Securities Trading Systems, 1999 COLUM. BUS. L. REV.
165 (1999).
Omri Yadlin, Should the SEC Regulate the Cyber
Securities Market?, 73 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 1355 (1998).
4.2.5 Tariff and Trade Control
4.3 Substantive Law Aspects
4.3.0 General
Richard A. Epstein, Before Cyberspace: Legal
Transitions in Property Rights Regimes, 73 CHI.-KENT
L. REV. 1137 (1998).
John C. Scheffel, Blinded By the Light: Common Law
and the Dangers of Cyber-Lawyering, 19 PACE L. REV.
37 (1998).
Timothy Wu, Application-Centered Internet Analysis,
85 VA. L. REV. 1163 (1999).
4.3.1 Computer Crime
Michael Hatcher et al., Computer Crimes, 36 AM.
CRIM. L. REV. 397 (1999).
Ellen S. Podgor, Criminal Fraud, 48 AM. U. L. REV.
729 (1999).
David C. Potter, Note, The Jake Baker Case: True
Threats and New Technology, 79 B.U. L. REV. 779
(1999).
Michael A. Sussman, The Critical Challenges from
International High-Tech and Computer-Related Crime
at the Millennium, 9 DUKE J. COMP. & INT'L L. 451
(1999).
James P. Terry, Cyberspace and the Use of Force, 9
DUKE J. COMP. & INT'L L. 491 (1999) (book review).
Patrick Weston, American Civil Liberties Union of
Georgia v. Miller, 14 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 403 (1999).
4.3.2 Computer-Related Product Liability
Margaret Renee Herman, Note, Are We Learning From
the Mistakes of Environmentalists? The Application of
Environmental Harmonized Models to the Automotive
Industry, 16 ARIZ. J. INDUS. & COMP. L. 543 (1999).
Peter Jakab, Framing Technology and Link Liability, 19
PACE L. REV. 23 (1998).
Sarah S. Jain, Inscription Fantasies and Interface
Erotics: A Social-Material Analysis of Keyboards,
Repetitive Strain Injuries and Products Liability Law, 9
HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 219 (1998).
4.3.3 Computer Security
Renee Albersheim, The Legal Implications of Corporate
Reverse Hacking, PREV. L. REP., Summer 1999, at 8.
Stephanie Brown, The No Electronic Theft Act: Stop
Internet Piracy!, 9 J. ART & ENT. L. 147 (1998).
Lieutenant Colonel LeEllen Coacher, Permitting
Systems Protection Monitoring: When the Government
Can Look and What It Can See, 46 A.F. L. REV. 155
(1999).
J.H. Reichman & Paul F. Uhlir, Database Protection at
the Crossroads: Recent Developments and their Impact
on Science and Technology, 14 BERKELEY TECH. L.J.
793 (1999).
Michael N. Schmitt, Computer Network Attack and the
Use of Force in International Law: Thoughts on a
Normative Framework, 37 COLUM. J. TRANSNAT'L L.
885 (1999).
Mark R. Shulman, Note, Discrimination in the Laws of
Information Warfare, 37 COLUM. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 939
(1999).
4.3.4 Taxation of Software
Gary D. Sprague et al., The Final Software Revenue
Characterization Regulations, 28 TAX MANAGEMENT
INT'L J. 59 (1999).
4.4 Problems of Privacy and Computers
4.4.0 General
Note, Privacy, Technology, and the California
"Anti-Paparazzi" Statute, 112 HARV. L. REV. 1367 (1999).
Parry Aftab & Nancy L. Savitt, Protecting Children's
Privacy and Regulating Cybertot Marketing Practices
Online, CHILDREN'S LEGAL RTS. J., Summer 1999, at 2.
Jerry Berman & Deirdre Mulligan, Privacy in the
Digital Age: Work in Progress, 23 NOVA L. REV. 552
(1999).
Jonathan P. Cody, Comment, Protecting Privacy Over
the Internet: Has the Time Come to Abandon
Self-Regulation?, 48 CATH. U. L. REV. 1183 (1998).
Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe,
Strasbourg, Protection of Privacy on the
Internet/Guidelines, 20 HUM. RTS. L.J. 275 (1999).
Ira Glasser, The Struggle for a New Paradigm:
Protecting Free Speech and Privacy in the Virtual
World of Cyberspace, 23 NOVA L. REV. 627 (1999).
Michael Kirby, Privacy In CyberSpace, 21 UNSWLJ
323 (1998).
Leslie A. Kurtz, The Invisible Becomes Manifest:
Information Privacy in a Digital Age, 38 WASHBURN
L.J. 151 (1998).
Steven Miller, Washington's "Spam-Killing" Statute:
Does It Slaughter Privacy in the Process?, 74 WASH. L.
REV. 453 (1999).
Karin Mika, Of Cell Phones and Electronic Mail:
Disclosure of Confidential Information Under
Disciplinary Rule 4-101 and Model Rule 1.6, 13 NOTRE
DAME J.L. ETHICS & PUB. POL'Y 121 (1999).
Major R. Ken Pippin, Consumer Privacy on the
Internet: It's "Surfer Beware", 47 A.F. L. REV. 125
(1999).
Joel R. Reidenberg, Restoring Americans' Privacy in
Electronic Commerce, 14 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 771
(1999).
Paul Starr, Health and the Right to Privacy, 25 AM. J.L.
& MED. 193 (1999).
Robert S. Steere, Note, Keeping "Private E-Mail"
Private: A Proposal To Modify The Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 33 VAL. U. L. REv. 231
(1999).
David M. Studdert, Direct Contacts, Data Sharing and
Employee Risk Selection: New Stakes for Patient
Privacy in Tomorrow's Health Insurance Markets, 25
AM. J.L. & MED. 233 (1999).
Domingo R. Tan, Note, Personal Privacy in the
Information Age: Comparison of Internet Data
Protection Regulations in the United States and
European Union, 21 LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 661
(1999).
Myrna L. Wigod, Privacy in Public and Private E-Mail
and On-Line Systems, 19 PACE L. REV. 95 (1998).
4.4.1 Data Privacy
Joe Baladi, Building Castles Made of Glass-Security on
the Internet, 21 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L.J. 251 (1999).
Cynthia M. Bott, Protection of Information Products:
Balancing Commercial Reality and the Public Domain,
67 U. CIN. L. REV. 237 (1998).
Sandra T.M. Chong, Data Privacy: The Use of
Prisoners for Processing Personal Information, 32 U.C.
DAVIS L. REV. 201 (1998).
4.4.2 Governmental Invasion of Privacy
4.4.3 Credit Reference
5. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION
5.0 General
John R.B. Clement, The State of Technology in U.S.
Schools: Making Counts of Technology/Making
Technology Count, CHILDREN'S LEGAL RTS. J., Summer
1999, at 43.
Michael Ferraraccio, Metal Detectors in the Public
Schools: Fourth Amendment Concerns, 28 J.L. & EDUC.
209 (1999).
Neeta Ragoowansi & Lynne B. Clement, Students on
the Internet--Rights and Education, CHILDREN'S LEGAL
RTS. J., Summer 1999, at 14.
Richard Florida, The Role of the University: Leveraging
Talent, Not Technology, ISSUES SCI. & TECH., Summer
1999, at 67.
5.1 Legal Education
Eric Blair, A Modest Proposal, 48 J. LEGAL EDUC. 449
(1998).
Maria Perez Crist, Technology in the LRW
Curriculum -- High Tech, Low Tech, or No Tech,
5 LEGAL WRITING 93 (1999).
6. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN BUSINESS
6.0 General
Michael E. Boersma, International Business
Transactions, the Internet, and the Convention on the
International Sale of Goods: Preventing Unintentional
Pitfalls, 7 J. INT'L L. & PRAC. 107 (1998).
Joseph F. Coughlin, Technology Needs of Aging
Boomers, ISSUES SCI. & TECH., Fall 1999, at 53.
Gail E. Evans and Brian F. Fitzgerald, Information
Transactions Under UCC Article 2B: The Ascendancy
of Freedom of Contract in the Digital Millennium, 21
UNSWLJ 404 (1998).
Brian Kennan, Internet Technology and Employee
Benefits, J. PENSION PLAN. & COMPL., Summer 1999, at
16.
Jerry C. Liu et al., Electronic Commerce: Using
Clickwrap Agreements, COMPUTER LAW., Dec. 1998, at
10.
Jonathan R. Macey & Maureen O'Hara, Regulating
Exchanges and Alternative Trading Systems: A Law and
Economics Perspective, 28 J. LEGAL STUD. 17 (1999).
Fiona MacMillan, Corporate Disclosure Online: An
Appropriate Response to Globalization, 21 UNSWLJ
514 (1998).
Ronald J. Mann, Secured Credit and Software
Financing, 85 CORNELL L. REV. 134 (1999).
John Rothchild, Protecting the Digital Consumer: The
Limits of Cyberspace Utopanism, 74 IND. L.J. 893
(1999).
Nancy Toross, Note, Double-Click on This: Keeping
Pace with On-line Market Manipulation, 32 LOY. L.A.
L. REV. 1399 (1999).
6.1 Electronic Commerce
Andrea Beatty et al., E-Payments and Australian
Regulation, 21 UNSWLJ 489 (1998).
C. Robert Beattie, Facilitating Electronic Commerce-The
Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, 32 UCC L.J.
243 (2000).
George Blair, Opportunities Not to Be Missed, J.L.
SOC'Y OF SCOT., Jan. 1999, at 40.
Jenny Clift, Electronic Commerce: The UNCITRAL
Model Law and Electronic Equivalents to Traditional
Bills of Lading, 27 INT'L BUS. LAW. 311 (1999).
Melissa De Zwart, Electronic Commerce: Promises,
Problems and Proposals, 21 UNSWLJ 305 (1998).
Leif Gamertsfelder, Electronic Bills of Exchange: Will
the Current Law Recognize Them?, 21 UNSWLJ 566
(1998).
George W. Gekas & James W. Harper, Early Returns
From Government Regulation of Electronic Commerce:
What's New is What's Old, 51 ADMIN. L. REV. 769
(1999).
Sarah Jane Hughes, A Case for Regulating
Cyberpayments, 51 ADMIN. L. REV. 809 (1999).
William F. Kroener III & Robert A. Patrick, Y2K: A
Pothole on the Information Super Highway to
Electronic Banking, 51 ADMIN. L. REV. 835 (1999).
Kalama Lui-Kwan & Kurt Opsahl, Foreword: The
Legal and Policy Framework for Global Electronic
Commerce, 14 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 503 (1999).
Michael K. Lindsey, Electronic Sale and Distribution of
Goods: Competitive Aspects, 27 INT'L BUS. LAW. 253
(1999).
Kerry Lynn Macintosh, The New Money, 14 BERKELEY
TECH. L.J. 659 (1999).
Kathryn O'Shea & Kylie Skeahan, Acceptance of Offers
by E-mail -- How Far Should the Postal Acceptance
Rule Extend?, 13 QUEENSL. U. TECH. L.J. 247 (1997).
Maureen A. O'Rourke, Progressing Towards a Uniform
Commercial Code for Electronic Commerce or Racing
Towards Nonuniformity?, 14 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 635
(1999).
Brooke Overlay, Will Cyberlaw be Uniform? An
Introduction to the UNCITRAL Model on Electronic
Commerce, 7 TUL. J. OF INT'L & COMP. LAW 219
(1999).
Shawn Pompian, Note, Is the Statute of Frauds Ready
for Electronic Contracting?, 85 VA. L. REV. 1447
(1999).
Bryan S. Schultz, Electronic Money, Internet
Commerce, and the Right to Financial Privacy: A Call
for New Federal Guidelines, 67 U. CIN. L. REV. 779
(1999).
Andrew L. Shapiro, Digital Middlemen and the
Architecture of Electronic Commerce, 24 OHIO N.U. L.
REV. 795 (1998).
Howard A. Shelanski, The Speed Gap: Broadband
Infrastructure and Electronic Commerce, 14 BERKELEY
TECH. L.J. 721 (1999).
Carl Pacini & David Sinason, Auditor Liability for
Electronic Commerce Transaction Assurance: The
CPA/CA Web Trust, 36 AM. BUS. L.J. 479 (1999).
Graham Walker, You, EU and E-commerce Too, J.L.
SOC'Y SCOT., Apr. 1999, at 32.
6.2 Computers and Technology in Banking and Finance
6.2.0 General
Olujoke E. Akindemowo, The Fading Rustle, Chink
And Jingle: Electronic Value And The Concept of
Money, 21 UNSWLJ 466 (1998).
Enrique R. Carrasco & Kristen J. Berg, Praxis-Oriented
Pedagogy: The E-Book on International Finance and
Development, 32 LOY. L.A. L. REV. 733 (1999).
Walter A. Effross, Logos, Links, and Lending: Towards
Standardized Privacy and Use Policies for Banking
Web Sites, 24 OHIO N.U. L. REV. 747 (1998).
William C. Freund & Clive Weil, A New Approach to
Banking the Unbanked, 116 BANKING L.J. 271 (1999).
Joshua S. Gans & Richard Scheelings, Economic Issues
Associated with Access to Electronic Payment Systems,
27 AUSTL. BUS. L. REV. 373 (1999).
Jeffrey J. Hass, Small Issue Public Offerings Conducted
Over the Internet: Are They "Suitable" for the Retail
Investor?, 72 S. CAL. L. REV. 67 (1998).
David Kreltszheim, Tracing Electronic Cash: Fraud
and the Electronic Transfer and Storage of Value, 27
AUSTL. BUS. L. REV. 112 (1999).
Jacqueline Marcucci, Note, The Brave New World of
Banking on the Internet: The Revolution of Our Banking
Practices, 23 NOVA L. REV. 739 (1999).
B.D. McCullough & H.D. Vinod, The Numerical
Reliability of Econometric Software, 37 J. ECON.
LITERATURE 633 (1999).
Christopher Rees, Electronic Payment Systems, 27 INT'L
BUS. LAW. 269 (1999).
Jennifer Burke Sylva, Comment, Bowie Bonds Sold For
Far More Than a Song: The Securitization of
Intellectual Property of J.P. as a Super-Charged
Vehicle for High Tech Financing, 15 SANTA CLARA
COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 195 (1998).
6.2.1 Online Securities Trading
Neil Andrews, Confucius and the Regulation of
Electronic Securities in the People's Republic of China,
9 AUSTL. J. CORP. L. 300 (1998).
Paul D. Cohen, Securities Trading Via the Internet, 4
STAN. J.L. BUS. & FIN. 1 (1999).
Daniel Everett Giddings, An Innovative Link Between
the Internet, the Capital Markets, and the SEC: How the
Internet Direct Public Offerings Helps Small
Companies Looking to Raise Capital, 25 PEPP. L. REV.
785 (1998).
Mary Lou Peters, Avoiding Securities Litigation
Liability on the Company Web Site, PREV. L. REP.,
Winter/Spring 1998-99, at 19.
Denis T. Rice, The Regulatory Response to the New
World of Cybersecurities, 51 ADMIN. L. REV. 901
(1999).
Andrew R. Thompson, Note, Taming the Frontier?: An
Evaluation of the SEC's Regulation of Internet
Securities Trading Systems, 1999 COLUM. BUS. L. REV.
165 (1999).
Omri Yadlin, Should the SEC Regulate the Cyber
Securities Market?, 73 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 1355 (1998).
6.3 Computers and Technology in the Transportation
Industry
6.4 Computers and Technology in Publishing
Thomas G. Field, Jr., Comment, Publishers Rights and
Wrongs in the Cyber Age, 39 IDEA 429 (1999).
6.5 Computers and Technology in Advertising
Christopher J. Schulte, "Abracadabra International, Ltd.
v. Abracadabra Creations Inc."--Internet Advertising
Just Federalized the Nation's Service Mark Law!, 22
HAMLINE L. REV. 563 (1999).
7. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION OF COMPUTERS AND
TECHNOLOGY
7.0 General
Howard C. Anawalt, Control of Inventions in a
Networked World, 15 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER &
HIGH TECH. L.J. 123 (1998).
Todd A. Borow, Copyright Ownership of Scholarly
Works Created by University Faculty and Posted on
School Provided Web Pages, 7 U. MIAMI BUS. L. REV.
149 (1998).
Dan L. Burk, Virtual Exit in the Global Information
Economy, 73 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 943 (1998).
Tamber Christian, Internet Caching: Something to
Think About, 67 UMKC L. REV. 477 (1999).
Michael Coblenz, Intellectual Property Crimes, 9 ALB.
L.J. SCI. & TECH. 235 (1999).
Thomas F. Cotter, Is This Conflict Really Necessary?:
Resolving an Ostensible Conflict Between Patent Law
and Federal Trademark Law, 3 MARQ. INTELL PROP. L.
REV. 25 (1999).
Joshua Allen Daub, Comment, A Premature Solution:
Legislative Reaction to the Debate Over Internet
Service Provider Liability for Copyright Infringement,
103 DICK. L. REV. 1 (1998).
Randy Gidseg et al., Intellectual Property Crimes, 36
AM. CRIM. L. REV. 835 (1999).
Trotter Hardy, Copyright and "New-Use" Technologies,
23 NOVA L. REV. 659 (1999).
Stuart K. Kauffman, Motion Pictures, Moral Rights,
and the Incentive Theory of Copyright: The Independent
Film Producer as "Author," 17 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT.
L.J. 749 (1999).
Rachel V. Leiterman, Comment, Smart Companies,
Foolish Choices? Product Designs that Harm
Competitions, 15 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH
TECH. L.J. 159 (1998).
Raymond T. Nimmer, Images and Contract Law--What
Law Applies to Transactions in Information, 36 HOUS.
L. REV. 1 (1999).
Matthew J. O'Connor, Squeezing into Traditional
Frames: Intellectual Property Law in the Shadow of the
Information Society, 12 INTELL. PROP. J. 285 (1998).
Maureen A. O'Rourke, Striking a Delicate Balance:
Intellectual Property, Antitrust, Contract, and
Standardization in the Computer Industry, 12 HARV.
J.L. & TECH. 1 (1998).
Greg Weiner, Reverse Engineering as a Method of
Achieving Compatibility in the Computer Industry, 6 U.
BALT. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 1 (1997).
Dana M. Wilson, Note, The Propagated Signal Claim:
What Is It and What Are the Infringement
Consequences?, 6 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 425 (1999).
Leanne Wiseman, Educational Ownership and Use: An
Opportunity to Rethink Copyright, J.L. & INFO. SCI.,
1998, at 110.
7.1 Patent
7.1.0 General
Imron T. Aly, Seller Beware: The Scope of the On Sale
Bar After Pfaff v. Wells, 7 TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 403
(1999).
Scott D. Anderson, Comment, A Right Without a
Remedy: The Unenforceable Medical Procedure Patent,
3 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 117 (1999).
Sharon Appel, Copyright, Digitization of Images, and
Art Museums: Cyberspace and Other New Frontiers, 6
UCLA ENT. L. REV. 149 (1999).
Shireen Irani Bacon et al., Recent Developments in
Patent Law, 7 TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 427 (1999).
Jean-Claude Boudreau, AT&T Technologies: A
Contribution to the Purposive Construction Approach
for Patent Infringement Analysis in Canada, 15 CAN.
INTELL. PROP. REV. 323 (1999).
William T. Kryger, Note, The Doctrine of Equivalents
into the Year 2000: The Line is Becoming Brighter for
Some but Remains Dim for Others, 3 MARQ. INTELL.
PROP. L. REV. 203 (1999).
Robert P. Merges, As Many as Six Impossible Patents
Before Breakfast: Property Rights for Business
Concepts and Patent System Reform, 14 BERKELEY
TECH. L.J. 577 (1999).
Fidel D. Nwamu, Does Your Claim Conform to
Means-Plus-Function Format Under Section 112, Paragraph
Six?, 6 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 189 (1999).
Max Stul Oppenheimer, In Vento Scribere: The
Intersection of Cyberspace and Patent Law, 52 FED.
COMM. L.J. 229 (1999).
Jonathan Pavlovcak, The Clock Starts Running Before
Substantial Completion- Pfaff v. Wells Electronic,
Inc.,--U.S.--, 119 S. Ct. 304 (1998), 17 TEMP. ENVTL.
L. & TECH. J. 177 (1999).
John R. Thomas, On Preparatory Texts and Proprietary
Technologies: The Place of Prosecution Histories in
Patent Claim Interpretation, 47 UCLA L. REV. 183
(1999).
7.1.1 Software Patent
Wesley L. Austin, Software Patents, 7 TEX. INTELL.
PROP. L.J. 225 (1999).
Erwin J. Basinski, Some Comments on Contributory and
Induced Patent Infringement; Implications for Software
Developers, 81 J. PAT. & TRADEMARK OFF. SOC'Y 777
(1999).
Alan P. Klein, Software Patenting: A New Approach, 6
U. BALT. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 135 (1998).
Stephen G. Kunin, Patent Eligibility in View of State
Street and AT&T v. Excel Communications, 81 J. PAT.
& TRADEMARK OFF. SOC'Y 671 (1999).
Claus D. Melarti, Note, State Street Bank & Trust Co. v.
Signature Financial Group, Inc.: Ought the
Mathematical Algorithm and Business Method
Exceptions Return to Business as Usual? 6 J. INTELL.
PROP. L. 359 (1999).
Raj Sardesai & Michael J. Ram, Protecting Intellectual
Property Rights in Software: The Software Patent, 11
LOY. CONSUMER L. REV. 99 (1999).
7.1.2 Biotech Patent
Mark J. Hanson, Biotechnology and Commodification
Within Health Care, 24 J. MED. & PHIL. 267 (1999).
Heidi L. Kraus & Robert C. Millonig, Biotech
Collaborations and Maximizing Patent Protection: Two
Hypotheticals, 27 AIPLA Q.J. 149 (1999).
Patricia A. Lacy, Comment, Gene Patenting: Universal
Heritage vs. Reward for Human Effort, 77 OR. L. REV.
783 (1998).
7.2 Software Copyright
7.2.0 General
Brian C. Behrens & Reuven R. Levary, Legal
Aspects -- Software Reverse Engineering and Copyright:
Past, Present and Future, 31 J. MARSHALL L. REV. 1 (1997).
Mark A. Haynes, Commentary: Black Holes of
Innovation in the Software Arts, 14 BERKELEY TECH.
L.J. 567 (1999).
Dennis S. Karjala, Copyright Protection of Computer
Program Structure, 64 BROOK. L. REV. 519 (1998).
Grace H. Lee, The Copyrightability of Computer
Software, 6 U. BALT. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 117 (1998).
7.2.1 User Interface
Jane M. Rolling, Comment, No Protection, No Progress
for Graphical User Interfaces, 2 MARQ. INTELL. PROP.
L. REV. 157 (1998).
7.2.2 Fair Use
7.2.3 Video Game
Kristine Boylan, Life After Quality King: A Proposal for
Evaluating Gray Market Activities Under the Fair Use
Doctrine, 27 AIPLA Q.J. 109 (1999).
7.3 Digital Copyright
7.3.0 General
Note, The Criminalization of Copyright Infringement in
the Digital Era, 112 HARV. L. REV. 1705 (1999).
Howard C. Anawalt, Using Digital Locks in Invention
Development, 15 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH
TECH. L.J. 363 (1999).
Carolyn Andrepont, Digital Millennium Copyright Act:
Copyright Protections for the Digital Age, 9 J. ART &
ENT. L. 397 (1999).
Kenneth W. Dam, Self-Help in the Digital Jungle, 28 J.
LEGAL STUD. 393 (1999).
Michael Fraser, Fair is Foul and Foul is Fair: From
Analogue to Digital Fair Dealing, 9 J.L. & INFO. SCI.
93 (1998).
Franklin Pierce Law Center's Seventh Biennial
Intellectual Property System Major Problems
Conference: Digital Technology and Copyright, A
Threat or A Promise? 39 IDEA 291 (1999).
Jane C. Ginsburg, Copyright Legislation for the "Digital
Millennium", 23 COLUM.-VLA J.L. & ARTS 137 (1999).
Catherine Hawkins, Technological Measures: Saviour
or Saboteur of the Public Domain? 9 J.L. & INFO. SCI.
45 (1998).
Derek M. Kroeger, Applicability of the Digital
Performance Right in Sound Recordings Act of 1995, 6
UCLA ENT. L. REV. 73 (1998).
David Nimaner, Puzzles of the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act, 46 J. COPYRIGHT SOC'Y U.S.A. 401
(1999).
Michelle A. Ravn, Note, Navigating Terra Incognita:
Why the Digital Millennium Copyright Act Was Needed
to Chart the Course of Online Service Provider Liability
for Copyright Infringement, 60 OHIO ST. L.J. 755
(1999).
Warwick A. Rothnie, Idea and Expression in a Digital
World, 9 J.L. & INFO. SCI. 59 (1998).
Pamela Samuelson, Intellectual Property and the
Digital Economy: Why the Anti-Circumvention
Regulations Need to be Revised, 14 BERKELEY TECH.
L.J. 519 (1999).
C. Paul Spurgeon, Digital Networks and Copyright:
Licensing and Accounting for Use -- The Role of
Copyright Collectives: Evolution or Revolution? 12
INTELL. PROP. J. 225 (1998).
Peter Treyde, Simplification of the Exceptions to the
Exclusive Rights Comprising Copyright, 9 J.L. & INFO.
SCI. 77 (1998).
7.3.1 Electronic Compilation
Kenneth W. Dam, Self-Help in the Digital Jungle, 28 J.
LEGAL STUD. 393 (1999).
Michael A. Forhan, Note, Tasini v. New York Times:
The Write Stuff for Copyrights Law?, 27 CAP. U. L.
REV. 863 (1999).
7.3.2 Computer Database
7.3.3 Multimedia
7.3.4 Computer-Generated Works
Kathleen Connolly Butler, Keeping the World Safe from
Naked-Chicks-in-Art Refrigerator Magnets: The Plot to
Control Art Images in the Public Domain through
Copyrights in Photographic and Digital Reproductions,
21 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L.J. 55 (1998).
7.4 Trademark
Leslie F. Brown, Avery Dennison Corp. v. Sumpton, 14
BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 247 (1999).
Michael A. Cromwell et al., Recent Developments in
Trademark Law, LOY. INTELL. PROP. & HIGH TECH.
L.Q., Spring/Summer 1998, at 1.
Christopher M. Dolan, Fits Over Counterfeiting:
Legislative Accomplishments and Directions, 27 AIPLA
Q.J. 233 (1999).
Robin W. Foster, Note, A Seamless Web of Confusion:
The Sixth Circuit Obfuscates the Law in Applying
Trademark Principles to Internet Domain Name
Conflicts in the Opinion of [Data Concepts, Inc. v.
Digital Consulting, Inc.], 26 N. KY. L. REV. 305 (1999).
R. Lawton Jordan III, Note, Thomas & Betts Corp. v.
Panduit Corp. -- Toward a Coherent View of Trade
Dress Protection for Product Configurations, 6 J.
INTELL. PROP. L. 323 (1999).
Tu Phan, Cybersell, Inc v. Cybersell, Inc., 14
BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 267 (1999).
7.5 Trade Secret
Peter Huang, Preventing Post-PepsiCo Disaster: A
Proposal for Refining the Inevitable Disclosure
Doctrine, 15 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH.
L.J. 379 (1999).
Lorin L. Reisner, Transforming Trade Secret Theft
Violations into Federal Crimes: The Economic
Espionage Act, 15 TOURO L. REV. 139 (1998).
Christopher A. Ruhl, Note, Corporate and Economic
Espionage: A Model Penal Approach for Legal
Deterrence to Theft of Corporate Trade Secrets and
Proprietary Business Information, 33 VAL. U. L. REV.
763 (1999).
John T. Soma & Charles P. Henderson, Encryption, Key
Recovery, and Commercial Trade Secret Assets: A
Proposed Legislative Model, 25 RUTGERS COMPUTER &
TECH. L.J. 97 (1999).
7.6 Semiconductor Chip Protection
W. Greg Papciak, Intergraph Corp. v. Intel Corp., 14
BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 323 (1999).
7.7 Licensing
Lorin Brennan, The Public Policy of Information
Licensing, 36 HOUS. L. REV. 61 (1999).
Morris E. Fischer, Why "Shrink Wrap" Licensing
Agreements Should Be Enforceable Against Software
Users Knowledgeable of Their Existence, 12 J.
SUFFOLK ACAD. L. 63 (1998).
Garry L. Founds, Shrinkwrap and Clickwrap
Agreements: 2B or Not 2B?, 52 FED. COMM. L.J. 99
(1999).
Robert W. Gomulkiewicz, How Copyleft Uses License
Rights to Succeed in the Open Source Software
Revolution and the Implications for Article 2B, 36
HOUS. L. REV. 179 (1999).
Mark D. Janis, A Tale of the Apocryphal Axe: Repair,
Reconstruction, and the Implied License in Intellectual
Property Law, 58 MD. L. REV. 423 (1999).
Jerry David Monroe, Comment, ProCD, Inc. v.
Zeindenberg: An Emerging Trend in Shrinkwrap
Licensing? 1 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 143 (1997).
Jane M. Rolling, The UCC Under Wraps: Exposing the
Need for More Notice to Consumers of Computer
Software with Shrinkwrapped Licenses, 104 COMM. L.J.
197 (1999).
Holly K. Towle, The Politics of Licensing Law, 36
HOUS. L. REV. 121 (1999).
7.8 Intellectual Property Issues of the Interact
David Allweiss, Copyright Infringement on the Internet:
Can the Wild, Wild West be Tamed?, 15 TOURO L. REV.
1005 (1999).
Paul D. Amrozowicz, When Law, Science and
Technology Worlds Collide: Copyright Issues on the
Internet, 81 J. OF PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE SOC.
81 (1999).
Jason R. Berne, All Dressed Up and No Place to Go:
The Need for Trade Dress Protection of Internet Sites,
27 AIPLA Q.J. 265 (1999).
Jason R. Berne, Court Intervention But Plot in a Classic
Form: A Survey of Remedies in Internet Trademark
Cases, 43 ST. LOUIS U. L.J. 1157 (1999).
Niva Elkin-Koren, Copyrights in Cyberspace--Rights
Without Laws?, 73 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 1155 (1998).
Jane C. Ginsburg, The Cyberian Captivity of Copyright:
Territoriality and Authors' Rights in a Networked
World, 15 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH.
L.J. 347 (1999).
Jennifer Golinveaux, What's in a Domain Name: Is
Cybersquatting Trademark Dilution?, 33 U.S.F. L. REV.
641 (1999).
Ari B. Good, Trade Secrets and the New Realities of the
Internet Age, 2 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 51
(1998).
Steven E. Halpern, New Protections for Internet Service
Providers: An Analysis of "The Online Copyright
Infringement Liability Limitation Act," 23 SETON HALL
LEGIS. J. 359 (1999).
Ryan Lambrecht, Trade Secrets and the Internet: What
Remedies Exist for Disclosure in the Information Age,
18 REV. OF LIT. 317 (1999).
Jeffrey J. Look, The Virtual Wild, Wild West (WWW):
Intellectual Property Issues in Cyberspace-Trademarks,
Service Marks, Copyrights and Domain Names, 22 U.
ARK. LITTLE ROCK L.J. 49 (1999).
Jennifer E. Markiewicz, Comment, Seeking Shelter from
the MP3 Storm: How Far Does the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act Online Service Provider Liability
Limitation Reach?, 7 COMM. L. CONSPECTUS 423
(1999).
Don W. Martens & Stacy R. Halpern, Copyright Law in
Cyberspace, 27 INT'L BUS. LAW. 151 (1999).
Barbara Anna McCoy, An Invisible Mark: A Meta-Tag
Controversy, 2 J. SMALL & EMERGING BUS. L. 377
(1998).
Rosaleen P. Morris, Note, Be Careful to Whom You
Link: How the Internet Practices of Hyperlinking and
Framing Pose New Challenges to Established
Trademark and Copyright Law, 30 RUTGERS L.J. 247
(1998).
Ira S. Nathenson, Internet Infoglut and Invisible Ink:
Spamdexing Search Engines with Meta Tags, 12 HARV.
J.L. & TECH. 43 (1998).
James Powers, Intellectual Property Problems
Associated with the Internet, 5 U. BALT. INTELL. PROP.
L.J. 85 (1997).
Michael A. Stoker, Framed Web Pages: Framing the
Derivative Works Doctrine on the World Wide Web, 67
U. CIN. L. REV. 1301 (1999).
Brian D. Wassum, Note, Copyright Implication of
Unconventional Linking on the World Wide Web:
Framing, Deep Linking and Inlining, 49 CASE W. RES.
L. REV. 181 (1998).
David Weiskopf, The Risks of Copyright Infringement
on the Internet: A Practitioner's Guide, 33 U.S.F. L.
REV. 1 (1999).
7.9 International Developments
7.9.0 General
Serge G. Avakian, Global Unfair Competition in the
Online Commerce Era, 46 UCLA L. REV. 905 (1999).
Michael J. Bastian, Protection of "Noncreative"
Databases: Harmonization of United States, Foreign
and International Law, 22 B.C. INT'L & COMP. L. REV.
425 (1999).
Rosemary J. Coombe, Intellectual Property, Human
Rights & Sovereignty: New Dilemmas in International
Law Posed by the Recognition of Indigenous Knowledge
and the Conservation of Biodiversity, 6 IND. J. GLOBAL
LEGAL STUD. 59 (1998).
Alan J. Hartnick, The Defense of "Fair Use": A Primer,
15 TOURO L. REV. 153 (1998).
Marshall A. Leaffer, The New World of International
Trademark Law, 2 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 1
(1998).
Stuart S. Malawer, The Digital Global Economy: WTO
Trade Agreements and Litigation, 11 INT'L L.
PRACTICUM 78 (1998).
Aileen A. Pisciotta, Regulation of International
Communications in the Age of the Internet: Lagging
Behind the Future, 33 INT'L LAW 367 (1999).
7.9.1 GATT-TRIPS
T. Alana Deere, Balancing Free Trade and the
Environment: A Proposed Interpretation of GATT
Article XX's Preamble, 10 INT'L LEGAL PERSP. 1 (1998).
George K. Foster, Opposing Forces in a Revolution in
International Patent Protection: The United States and
India in the Uruguay Round and its Aftermath, 3 UCLA
J. INT'L L. & FOREIGN AFF. 283 (1999).
Richard G. Frenkel, Note, Intellectual Property in the
Balance: Proposals for Improving Industrial Design
Protection in the Post-TRIPS Era, 32 LOY. L.A. L. REV.
531 (1999).
Charles R. McManis, International Intellectual
Property Protection and Emerging Computer
Technology: Taking TRIPS on the Information Super
Highway, 14 NIHON U. COMP. L. 195 (1997).
7.9.2 NAFTA
7.9.3 Developments in Canada
Malcolm E. McLeod, Recent Copyright Developments:
The Canadian Perspective, 15 CAN. INTELL. PROP.
REV. 39 (1998).
Jonathan E. Moskin, Canada and the Future of Internet
Governance, 15 CAN. INTELL. PROP. REV. 247 (1999).
Raymond H. Saunders, Does Canadian Patent Practice
Impair Technological Development?, 15 CAN. INTELL.
PROP. REV. 265 (1999).
David Vaver, Copyright in Canada: The New
Millenium, 12 INTELL. PROP. J. 117 (1998).
7.9.4 Developments in Mexico and Latin America
7.9.5 Developments in Australia and New Zealand
7.9.6 Developments in Africa
Paul Kuruk, Protecting Folklore Under Modern
Intellectual Property Regimes: A Reappraisal of the
Tensions Between Individual and Communal Rights in
Africa and the United States, 48 AM. U. L. REV. 769
(1999).
7.9.7 Developments in Asia
Amy Choe, Note, Korea's Road Toward Respecting
Intellectual Property Rights, 25 RUTGERS COMPUTER &
TECH. L.J. 341 (1999).
John D. DeFrance, Note, Sound Recordings: Copyright
and Contractual Differences Between the United States
and Japan, 21 LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 331
(1999).
Michael W. Smith, Note, Bringing Developing
Countries' Intellectual Property Law to TRIPs
Standards: Hurdles and Pitfalls Facing Vietnam's
Efforts to Normalize an Intellectual Property Regime,
31 CASE W. RES. J. INT'L L. 211 (1999).
John A. Tessensohn, Reversal of Fortune
-- Pharmaceutical Experimental Use and Patent
Infringement in Japan, 4 J. INT'L LEGAL STUD. 1
(1998).
Ako Shimada Williams, International Exhaustion of
Patent Rights Doctrine: Is Japan's Move a Step
Forward or Back From the Current Harmonization
Effort?, 7 J. INT'L L. & PRAC. 327 (1998).
7.9.8 Developments in Western Europe
Michael Lehmann, The European Database Directive
and Its Implementation into German Law, 29 INT'L REV.
INDUS. PROP. & COPYRIGHT L., 776 (1998).
John A. Tessensohn, May You Live in Interesting Times
-- European Trademark Law in the Wake of Sabel BV v.
Puma AGI, 6 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 217 (1999).
7.9.9 Developments in Eastern Europe and Russia
8. COMPUTERS AND LEGAL REASONING
8.0 General
Istvan Borgulya, Two Examples of Decision Support in
the Law, 7 ART. INTELL. & C. 303 (1999).
Danielle Bourcier & Gerard Clergue, From a Rule-Based
Conception to Dynamic Patterns: Analyzing the
Self-Organization of Legal Systems, 7 ART. INTELL. &
L. 211 (1999).
Rosaria Conte et al., Comment, Introduction: Agents
and Norms: How to Fill the Gap?, 7 ART. INTELL. & L.
1 (1999).
Frank Dignum, Note, Autonomous Agents with Norms, 7
ART. INTELL. & L. 69 (1999).
Dan Hunter, Note, Out of Their Minds: Legal Theory in
Neural Networks, 7 ART. INTELL. & L. 128 (1999).
Christen Krogh & Henning Herrestad, Hohfeld in
Cyberspace and Other Applications of Normative
Reasoning in Agent Technology, 7 ART. INTELL. & L.
81 (1999).
Philip Leith, Note, The Judge and the Computer: How
Best `Decision Support'?, 6 ART. INTELL. & L. 289
(1998).
8.1 Artificial Intelligence
Magnus Boman, Norms in Artificial Decision Making, 7
ART. INTELL. & L. 17 (1999).
Dieter Merkl et al., Exploratory Analysis of Concept
and Document Spaces with Connectionist Networks, 7
ART. INTELL. & L. 185 (1999).
Lothar Philipps & Giovanni Sartor, Note, Introduction:
From Legal Theories to Neutral Networks and Fuzzy
Reasoning, 7 ART. INTELL. & L. 115 (1999).
Mingqiang Xu et al., A Fuzzy Theoretical Approach to
Case-Based Representation and Inference in CISG, 7
ART. INTELL. & L. 259 (1999).
9. LEGAL ISSUES OF THE INTERNET
9.0 General
Developments in the Law, The Law of Cyberspace, 112
HARV. L. REV. 1574 (1999).
Rolf Auf der Maur, Internet-Enabled Distribution
Models, 27 INT'L BUS. LAW. 264 (1999).
Rosa Julia-Barcelo, Liability for On-Line
Intermediaries: A European Perspective, 20 EUR.
INTELL. PROP. REV. 453(1998).
Jonathan D. Bick, Why Should the Internet Be Any
Different?, 19 PACE L. REV. 41 (1998).
Jody Storm Cale, Note, Service Over the "Net":
Principles of Contract Law in Conflict, 49 CASE W.
RES. J. INT'L L 567 (1999).
Steven C. Carlson, A Historical, Economic and Legal
Analysis of Municipal Ownership of the Information
Highway, 25 RUTGERS COMPUTER & TECH. L.J. 1
(1999).
Kirsten J. Crawford, Electronic Mail: The Implications
of Its Retention and Destruction, PREY. L. REP.,
Winter/Spring 1998/1999, at 29.
Lothar Determann, The New German Internet Law, 22
HASTINGS INT'L & COMP. L. REV. 113 (1998).
Barbara Esbin, Internet Over Cable: Defining the
Future in Terms of the Past, 7 COMM. L. CONSPECTUS
37 (1999).
William W. Fisher III, Property and Contract on the
Internet, 73 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 1203 (1998).
Tamar Frankel, The Internet, Securities Regulation, and
Theory of Law, 73 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 1319 (1998).
A. Michael Froomkin, The Empire Strikes Back, 73
CHI.-KENT L. REV. 1101 (1998).
Nancy R. Furnari, Are Traditional Agency Principles
Effective for Internet Transactions, Given the Lack of
Personal Interaction?, 63 ALB. L. REV. 537 (1999).
Alain Gardrat, Another Look at European Internet Law,
MEDIA L. & POL'Y, Fall 1998, at 27.
Jack Goldsmith, Regulation of the Internet: Three
Persistent Fallacies, 73 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 1119
(1998).
Spencer Kass, Regulation and the Internet, 26 S.U. L.
REV. 93 (1998).
Roberta Katz, The Power of Chaos, 73 CHI.-KENT L.
REV. 1133 (1998).
Mark A. Lemley, The Law and Economics of Internet
Norms, 73 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 1257 (1998).
Henry H. Perritt, Jr., International Administrative Law
for the Internet: Mechanisms of Accountability, 51
ADMIN. L. REV. 871 (1999).
Henry H. Perritt, Jr., The Internet is Changing
International Law, 73 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 997 (1998).
David G. Post & David R. Johnson, "Chaos Prevailing
on Every Continent": Towards a New Theory of
Decentralized Decision-Making in Complex Systems, 73
CHI.-KENT L. REV. 1055 (1998).
Patrick Quirk, The Future of Cyberlaw--Playing `Cheat
the Prophet', 10 BOND L. REV. 1 (1998).
Margaret Jane Radin & R. Polk Wagner, The Myth of
Private Ordering: Rediscovering Legal Realism in
Cyberspace, 73 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 1295 (1998).
Jonathan D. Whitater & Paige S. Rutner, Web Trust: A
Technique to Reduce Risk in Electronic Commerce, 66
J. TRANSP. L., LOGISTICS & POL'Y 484 (1999).
Jane Kaufman Winn, The Hedgehog and the Fox:
Distinguishing Public and Private Sector Approaches to
Managing Risk for Internet Transactions, 51 ADMIN. L.
REV. 955 (1999).
9.1 ISP and Internet Access
Kasey A. Chappelle, Comment, The End of the
Beginning: Theories and Practical Aspects of
Reciprocal Compensation for Internet Traffic, 7 COMM.
L. CONSPECTUS 393 (1999).
Kimberly S. Keller, From Little Acorns Great Oaks
Grow: The Constitutionality of Protecting Minors from
Harmful Internet Material in Public Libraries, 30 ST.
MARY'S L.J. 549 (1999).
Lewis S. Malakoff, Are You My Mommy, or My Big
Brother? Comparing Internet Censorship in Singapore
and the United States, 8 PAC. RIM. L. & POL'Y J. 423
(1999).
Peter W. Martin, The Internet: Full and Unfettered
Access to Law-Some Implications, 26 N. KY. L. REV.
181 (1999).
Jennifer A. Rupert, Tangled in the Web: Federal and
State Efforts to Protect Children from Internet
Pornography, 11 LOY. CONSUMER L. REP. 130 (1999).
Brent L. Van Norman, The Library Internet Filter: On
the Computer or in the Child, 11 REGENT U. L. REV.
425 (1998-99).
Bruce Watson, Why Libraries Should Filter internet
Access, CHILDREN'S LEGAL RTS. J., Summer 1999, at
61.
9.2 Domain Names
Alan I. Cyrlin, Reducing a Company's Risk Over
Domain Name Disputes, 81 J. PAT. & TRADEMARK
OFF. SOC'Y 42 (1999).
Brian Fitzgerald, Marketing Your Web Site: Legal
Issues Relating to the Allocation of Internet Domain
Names, 21 UNSWLJ 549 (1998).
Marshall Leafer, Domain Names, Globalization, and
Internet Governance, 6 IND. J. GLOBAL LEGAL STUD.
139 (1998).
Joseph P. Liu, Legitimacy and Authority in Internet
Coordination: A Domain Name Case Study, 74 IND. L.J.
587 (1999).
Todd W. Krieger, Internet Domain Names and
Trademarks: Strategies for Protecting Brand Names in
Cyberspace, 32 SUFFOLK U. L. REV. 47 (1998).
Marcus Maher, Cable Internet Unbundling: Local
Leadership in the Deployment of High Speed Access, 52
FED. COMM. L.J. 211 (1999).
Angela Proffitt, Drop the Government, Keep the Law:
New International Body for Domain Name Assignment
Can Learn from United States Trademark Experience,
19 LOY. L.A. ENT. L.J. 601 (1999).
Graham Walker, What's In A Name?, J.L. SOC'Y SCOT.,
May 1999, at 29.
9.3 Taxation of Electronic Commerce
Reuven S. Avi-Yonah, International Taxation of
Electronic Commerce, 52 TAX L. REV. 507 (1997).
Michael P. Boyle et al., The Emerging International Tax
Environment for Electronic Commerce, 28 TAX MGMT.
INT'L J. 357 (1999).
David F. Bradford, Electronic Commerce and
Fundamental Tax Reform, 52 TAX L. REV. 561 (1997).
Julie M. Buechler, Note, Virtual Reality: Quill's
"Physical Presence" Requirement Obsolete When
Cogitating Use Tax Collection in Cyberspace, 74 N.D.
L. REV. 479 (1998).
Christian Cheruy, Tax Aspects of Electronic Commerce
Transactions, 27 INT'L BUS. LAW. 261 (1999).
Arthur J. Cockfield, Balancing National Interests in the
Taxation of Electronic Commerce Business Profits, 74
TUL. L. REV. 133 (1999).
J. Clifton Fleming Jr., U.S. Income Taxation of Profits
from Software Sales By Australian Vendors into the U.S.
via the Internet, INT'L TRADE & BUS. L. ANN., April
1999, at 97.
David L. Forst, Old and New Issues in the Taxation of
Electronic Commerce, 14 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 711
(1999).
Walter Hellerstein, Internet Tax Freedom Act Limits
States' Power to Tax Internet Access and Electronic
Commerce, 90 J. TAX'N 5 (1999).
Walter Hellerstein, State Taxation of Electronic
Commerce, 52 TAX L. REV. 425 (1997).
James John Jurinski, Federalism and State Taxation of
E-Commerce: Is the End in Sight for State Sales Taxes?,
J. ST. TAX'N, Fall 1999, at 30.
Stanley I. Katz, International Taxation of Electronic
Commerce: Evolution Not Revolution, 52 TAX L. REV.
655 (1997).
Michael J. McIntyre, Taxing Electronic Commerce
Fairly and Efficiently, 52 TAX L. REV. 625 (1997).
Matthew G. McLaughlin, Comment, The Internet Tax
Freedom Act: Congress Takes a Bite Out of the Net, 48
CATH. U. L. REV. 209 (1998).
Charles E. McLure, Jr., Taxation of Electronic
Commerce: Economic Objectives, Technological
Constraints, and Tax Laws, 52 TAX L. REV. 269 (1997).
Paul Mines, Conversing With Professor Hellerstein:
Electronic Commerce and Nexus Propel Sales and Use
Tax Reform, 52 TAX L. REV. 581 (1997).
David J. Shakow, Taxing Nothings: Intangibles on the
Internet, 52 TAX L. REV. 571 (1997).
Anna M. Vanderhoff, Comment, The Tax Man Cometh:
A Realistic View of the Taxation of Internet Commerce,
27 CAP. U. L. REV. 929 (1999).
Auri Weitz, WWW.Foreign Corporation.Com: The US
Taxation of International Business Transactions
Conducted Over the Internet, 9 FORDHAM INTELL.
PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 625 (1999).
9.4 Encryption and Digital Signatures
Stewart A. Baker, International Developments Affecting
Digital Signatures, 32 INT'L LAW 963 (1998).
Amelia H. Boss, Searching for Security in the Law of
Electronic Commerce, 23 NOVA L. REV. 583 (1999).
Jose Carlos Erdozain, Encryption Technologies and
Digital Signatures, 27 INT'L BUS. LAW. 275 (1999).
E. Franklin Haignere, Comment, An Overview of the
Issues Surrounding The Encryption Exportation Debate,
the Ramifications, and Potential Resolution, 22 MD. J.
INT'L L. & TRADE 319 (1998/1999).
Edward D. Kania, The ABA's Digital Signature
Guidelines: An Imperfect Solution to Digital Signatures
on the Internet, 7 COMM. L. CONSPECTUS 297 (1999).
Michael Lee et al., Electronic Commerce, Hackers, and
the Search for Legitimacy: A Regulatory Proposal, 14
BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 837 (1999).
Kalama M. Lui-Kwan, Recent Developments in Digital
Signature Legislation and Electronic Commerce, 14
BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 463 (1999).
Lynn F. McNulty, Encryption's Importance to
Economic and Infrastructure Security, 9 DUKE J. COMP.
& INT'L L. 427 (1999).
Daniel R. Rua, Comment, Cryptobabble: How
Encryption Disputes Are Shaping Free Speech for the
New Millennium, 24 N.C. J. INT'L L. & COM. REG. 125
(1998).
Brian W. Smith & Paul S. Tufaro, To Certify or Not to
Certify? The OCC Opens the Door to Digital Signature
Certification, 24 OHIO N.U. L. REV. 813 (1998).
Brian W. Smith & Kimberly B. Kiefer, Recent
Developments in Electronic Authentication: The
Evolving Role of the Certification Authority, 116
BANKING L.J. 341 (1999).
Mark Sneddon, Legislating to Facilitate Electronic
Signatures and Records: Exceptions, Standards and the
Impact on the Statute Book, 21 UNSWLJ 334 (1998).
9.5 Internet Crime
Katia Bodard et al., Crime on the Internet. A Challenge
to Criminal Law in Europe, 5 MAASTRICHT J. EUR. &
COMP. L. 222 (1998).
Annemarie Pantazis, Note, Zeran v. America Online,
Inc.: Insulating Internet Service Providers From
Defamation Liability, 34 WAKE FOREST L. REV. 531
(1999).
Andrew J. Slitt, Note, The Anonymous Publisher:
Defamation on the Internet After Reno v. American
Civil Liberties Union and Zeran v. America Online, 31
CONN. L. REV. 389 (1999).
9.6 Civil Procedure in Cyberspace
Steven Betensky, Jurisdiction and the Internet, 19 PACE
L. REV. 1 (1998).
Christopher S.W. Blake, Note, Destination Unknown:
Does the Internet's Lack of Physical Situs Preclude
State and Federal Attempts to Regulate It?, 46 CLEV.
ST. L. REV. 129 (1998).
Kai Burmeister, Jurisdiction, Choice of Law, Copyright,
and the Internet: Protection Against Framing in an
International Setting, 9 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP.
MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 625 (1999).
Christopher E. Friel, Downloading a Defendant: Is
Categorizing Internet Contacts a Departure from the
Minimum Contacts Test?, 4 ROGER WILLIAMS L. REV.
293 (1998).
Jenine Elco Graves, Comment, Physical Presence in
Cyberspace: As Electronic Commerce Takes Off, Does
Quill Leave Local Merchants in the Dust?, 37 DUQ. L.
REV. 261 (1999).
Paul Hamilton, The Extraterritorial Reach of the United
States Securities Laws Towards Initial Public Offerings
Conducted Over the Internet, 13 ST. JOHN'S J. LEGAL
COMMENTARY 343 (1998).
Robert M. Harkins, Jr., The Legal World Wide Web:
Electronic Personal Jurisdiction in Commercial
Litigation, or How to Expose Yourself to Liability
Anywhere in the World with the Press of a Button, 25
PEPP. L. REV. 785 (1997).
David Hodson & David Allison, Service by Email in
Family Proceedings, 29 FAM. L.Q. 726 (1999).
Leonard Klingbaum, Benusan Restaurant v. King: An
Erroneous Application of Personal Jurisdiction Law to
Internet-Based Contracts (Using the Reasonableness
Test to Ensure Fair Assertions of Personal Jurisdiction
Based on Cyberspace Contacts), 19 PACE L. REV. 149
(1998).
John A. Lowther IV, Note, Personal Jurisdiction and
the Internet Quagmire: Amputating Judicially Created
Long-Arms, 35 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 619 (1998).
Matthew Oetker, Note, Personal Jurisdiction and the
Internet, 47 DRAKE L. REV. 3 (1999).
Shane A. Orians, Exercising Personal Jurisdiction on
the Internet: The Misapplication of the Asahi Metal
Decision to "Cyberspace," 24 OHIO N.U. L. REV. 843
(1998).
Henry H. Perritt, Jr., Will the Judgement-Proof Own
Cyberspace?, 32 INT'L LAW. 1121 (1998).
George M. Perry, Personal Jurisdiction in Cyberspace:
Where Can You Be Sued, and Whose Laws Apply?,
MEDIA L. & POL'Y, Fall 1998, at 1.
Richard Philip Rollo, The Morass of Internet Personal
Jurisdiction: It Is Time for a Paradigm Shift, 52 FED.
COMM. L.J. 667 (1999).
Scott D. Sanford, Note, Nowhere to Run ... Nowhere to
Hide: Trademark Holders Reign Supreme in Panavision
Int'l, L.P. v. Toeppen, 29 GOLDEN GATE U. L. REV. 1
(1999).
Motty Shulman, Note, Http://www.personaljurisdiction.com,
23 NOVA L. REV. 781 (1999).
Michael J. Sikora III, Note, Beam Me Into Your
Jurisdiction: Establishing Personal Jurisdiction via
Electronic Contacts in Light of the Sixth Circuit's
Decision in Compuserve, Inc. v. Patterson, 27 CAP. U.
L. REV. 163 (1998).
Allan R. Stein, The Unexceptional Problem of
Jurisdiction in Cyberspace, 32 INT'L LAW. 1167 (1998).
Kevin N. Tharp, Federal Court Jurisdiction Over
Private TCPA Claims: Why the Federal Courts of
Appeals Got It Right, 52 FED. COMM. L.J. 189 (1999).
Pierre Trudel, Jurisdiction Over the Internet: A
Canadian Perspective, 32 INT'L LAW. 1027 (1998).
10. LAW AND TECHNOLOGY
10.0 General
Carl W. Chamberlin, To the Millennium: Emerging
Issues for the Year 2000 and Cyberspace, 13 NOTRE
DAME J.L. ETHICS & PUB. POL'Y 131 (1999).
The Honorable Porter Goss, An Introduction to the
Impact of Information Technology on National Security,
9 DUKE J. COMP. & INT'L L. 391 (1999).
Roderick Mather, Technology and the Search for
Shipwrecks, 30 J. MAR. L. & COM. 175 (1999).
Robert W. Rycroft & Don E. Kash, Innovation Policy
for Complex Technologies, ISSUES SCI. & TECH., Fall
1999, at 73.
10.1 Technology Transfer
Hayden R. Brainard, Survey and Study of Technology
Development and Transfer Needs in New York, 9 ALB.
L.J. SCI. & TECH. 423, (1999).
Ulrich W. Lowenstein et al., Technology Transfers:
International Tax Implications, INT'L TAX J., Spring
1999, at 1.
10.2 Audio/Video Recording
Laud Deyhimy, Why Seeing is No Longer Believing:
Misappropriations of Image and Speech, 19 LOY. L.A.
ENT. L.J. 51 (1998).
K.J. Greene, Copyright, Culture & Black Music: A
Legacy of Unequal Protection, 21 HASTINGS COMM. &
ENT. L.J. 339 (1999).
M.J. Le Brun, Learning Interviewing with Video:
Creating Multimedia Packages for Skills Teaching, 16
J. PROF. LEGAL EDUC. 187 (1999).
Jeanmarie LoVoi, Competing Interests: Anti-Piracy
Efforts Triumph under TRIPs But New Copying
Technology Undermines the Success, 25 BROOK. J.
INT'L L. 445 (1999).
Hon. Jon O. Newman, New Lyrics for an Old Melody:
The Idea/Expression Dichotomy in the Computer Age,
17 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 691 (1999).
10.3 Space Law
Stacy J. Ratner, Note, Establishing the Extraterrestrial:
Criminal Jurisdiction and the International Space
Station, 22 B.C. INT'L & COMP. L. REV. 249 (1999).
G.S. Sachdeva, Space Tourism: Some Legal
Implications, 39 INDIAN J. INT'L L. 47 (1999).
Jocelyn H. Shoemaker, Note, The Patents in Space Act:
Jedi Mind Trick or Real Protection for American
Inventors on the International Space Station?, 6 J.
INTELL. PROP. L. 395 (1999).
10.4 Medical Technology
D.S. Badkur & Arneet Arora, Trivial Injuries,
Associated Congenital Anomaly and Medicolegal
Interpretation of Death, 39 MED., SCI. & L. 72 (1999).
Gloria J. Banks, Traditional Concepts and
Nontraditional Conceptions: Social Security Survivor's
Benefits for Posthumously Conceived Children, 32 LOY.
L.A. L. REV. 251 (1999).
David B. Cruz, Controlling Desires: Sexual Orientation
Conversion and the Limits of Knowledge and Law, 72 S.
CAL. L. REV. 1297 (1999).
Judith F. Daar, Assisted Reproductive Technologies and
the Pregnancy Process: Developing an Equality Model
to Protect Reproductive Liberties, 25 AM. J.L. & MED.
455 (1999).
Janet L. Dolgin, An Emerging Consensus: Reproductive
Technology and the Law, 23 VT. L. REV. 225 (1998).
Judith D. Fischer, Misappropriations of Human Eggs
and Embryos and the Tort of Conversion: A Relational
View, 32 LOY. L.A. L. REV. 381 (1999).
Barry R. Furrow, Broadcasting Clinical Guidelines on
the Internet: Will Physicians Tune In?, 25 AM. J.L. &
MED. 403 (1999).
Henry D. Gabriel & Eunice B. Davis, Legal Ethics in
Reproductive Technology, 45 LOY. L. REV. 221 (1999).
Michelle Lynn Hibbert, Wrongful Birth: Shaping the
Future Generation Through Negligence Actions, 46
MED. TRIAL TECH. Q., at 103.
Angie Godwin McEwen, Note, So You're Having
Another Woman's Baby: Economics and Exploitation in
Gestational Surrogacy, 32 VAND. J. TRANSNAT'L L.
271 (1999).
Pamela Jensen, Note, Genetic Privacy: The Potential
for Genetic Discrimination in Insurance, 29 VICTORIA
U. WELLINGTON L. REV. 347 (1999).
John Bologna Krentel, The Louisiana "Human Embryo"
Statute Revisited: Reasonable Recognition and
Protection for the In Vitro Fertilized Ovum, 45 LOY. L.
REV. 239 (1999).
Patricia C. Kuszler, Telemedicine and Integrated Health
Care Delivery: Compounding Malpractice Liability, 25
AM. J.L. & MED. 297 (1999).
Richard M. Kuntz, Off-Label Prescribing of
Antidepressants and Anxiolytics: An Attorney's Guide to
Psychoactive Drugs, 26 J. PSYCHIATRY & LAW 519
(1998).
Kathryn Venturatos Lorio, The Process of Regulating
Assisted Reproductive Technologies: What We Can
Learn from our Neighbors -- What Translates and What
Does Not, 45 LOY. L. REV. 247 (1999).
Richard A. McCormick, Reproductive Technologies:
Where Are We Headed?, 45 LOY. L. REV. 269 (1999).
John Murray, Note, Owning Genes: Disputes Involving
DNA Sequence Patents, 75 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 231
(1999).
Frederick R. Parker, Jr., The Withholding or Withdrawal
of Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment Under Louisiana
Law, 45 LOY. L. REV. 121 (1999).
Susan P. Pauker, Clinical Commentary: The Challenges
of Genetic Medicine to the Patient-Physician
Relationship, 26 J.L. MED. & ETHICS 221 (1998).
Melissa M. Perry, Note, Fragmented Bodies, Legal
Privilege and Commodification in Science and
Medicine, 51 ME. L. REV. 170 (1999).
Philip G. Peters, Jr., Harming Future Persons:
Obligations to the Children of Reproductive
Technology, 8 S. CAL. INTERDISC. L.J. 375 (1999).
Arti K. Rai, Reflective Choice in Health Care: Using
Information Technology to Present Allocation Options,
25 AM. J.L. & MED. 387 (1999).
John A. Robertson, Oocyte Cytoplasm Transfers and the
Ethics of Germ-Line Intervention, 26 J.L. MED. &
ETHICS 211 (1998).
Arnold J. Rosoff, Informed Consent in the Electronic
Age, 25 AM. J.L. & MED. 367 (1999).
Helena Gail Rubinstein, If I am Only for Myself, What
am I? A Communitarian Look at the Privacy Stalemate,
25 AM. J.L. & MED. 203 (1999).
Alec Samuels, Whose Body Is It Anyway?, 39 MED.,
SCI. & L. 285 (1999).
Karen S. Scott & John S. Oliver, Vitreous Humor as an
Alternative Sample to Blood for the Supercritical Fluid
Extraction of Morphine and 6-Monoacetylmorphine, 39
MED., SCI. & L. 77 (1999).
Robert I. Simon, The Suicide Prevention Contract:
Clinical, Legal, and Risk Management Issues, 27 AM.
ACAD. PSYCHIATRY & L. 445 (1999).
Robert I. Simon & Daniel W. Shuman, Conducting
Forensic Examinations of the Road: Are You Practicing
Your Profession Without A License?, 27 AM. ACAD.
PSYCHIATRY & L. 75 (1999).
Alissa R. Spielberg, Online Without a Net:
Physician-Patient Communication by Electronic Mail,
25 AM. J.L. & MED. 267 (1999).
Alison M. Sulentic, Crossing Borders: The Licensure of
Interstate Telemedicine Practitioners, J. LEGIS., 1999,
at 1.
Nicolas P. Terry, Cyber-Malpractice: Legal Exposure
for Cybermedicine, 25 AM. J.L. & MED. 327 (1999).
Joshua S. Vinciguerra, Showing "Special
Respect"-Permitting the Gestation of Abandoned Preembryos,
9 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 399 (1999).
Ranney Wiesemann, On-Line or On-Call? Legal and
Ethical Challenges Emerging in Cybermedicine, 43 ST.
LOUIS U. L.J. 1119 (1999).
Jessica Lynne Wilson, Note, Technology as a Panacea:
Why Pregnancy-Related Problems Should be Defined
Without Regard to Mitigating Measures Under the
ADA, 52 VAND. L. REV. 831 (1999).
Colin J. Zick, Compensation for Telemedicine Services:
Current Issues and the Future Prospects, 2 J. MED. &
L. 117 (1998).
10.5 Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals
Kirsten S. Beaudoin, Comment, On Tonight's Menu:
Toasted Cornbread with Firefly Genes? Adapting Food
Labeling Law to Consumer Protection Needs in the
Biotech Century, 83 MARQ. L. REV. 237 (1999).
Dean Bell, Human Cloning and International Human
Rights Law, 21 SYDNEY L. REV. 202 (1999).
Craig M. Borowski, Comment, Human Cloning
Research in Japan: A Study in Science, Culture,
Morality, and Patent Law, 9 IND. INT'L & COMP. L.
REV. 505 (1999).
Melissa K. Cantrell, International Response to Dolly:
Will Scientific Freedom Get Sheared?, J.L. & HEALTH,
1998 - 1999, at 69.
Patricia I. Carter, Federal Regulation of
Pharmaceuticals in the United States and Canada, 21
LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 215 (1999).
Leslie Cataldo, A Dynasty Weaned From
Biotechnology: The Emerging Face of China,
SYRACUSE J. INT'L L. & COM., Fall 1998, at 151.
Elizabeth B. Cooper, Testing for Genetic Traits: The
Need for a New Legal Doctrine of Informed Consent, 58
MD. L. REV. 346 (1999).
James Gregory Cullem, Panning for Biotechnology
Gold: Reach-Through Royalty Damage Awards for
Infringing Uses of Patented Molecular Sieves, 39 IDEA
553 (1999).
Donald G. Daus, New U.S. Legislation: Biotechnology
Process Patents - A Legislative Change and
Administrative Expansion, 12 INTELL. PROP. J. 333
(1998).
Carlos F. Davalos, Software South of the Border on the
Eve of the Millenium: The Y2K Glitch in the Mexican
Courtroom, 11 INT'L LAW PRACTICUM 93 (1998).
H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., Critical Care: Why There is
No Global Bioethic, 23 J. MED. & PHIL. 641 (1998).
Kathinka Evers, The Identity of Clones, 24 J. MED. &
PHIL. 67 (1999).
Meredith A. Jagutis, Comment, Insurer's Access to
Genetic Information: The Call for Comprehensive
Federal Legislation, 82 MARQ. L. REV. 429 (1999).
Melinda B. Kaufmann, Genetic Discrimination in the
Workplace: An Overview of Existing Protections, 30
LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 393 (1999).
M. Cathleen Kaveny, Cloning and Positive Liberty, 13
NOTRE DAME J.L. ETHICS & PUB. POL'Y 15 (1999).
Christopher M. Keefer, Comment, Bridging the Gap
Between Life Insurer and Consumer in the Genetic
Testing Era: The RF Proposal, 74 IND. L.J. 1375
(1999).
Kevin M. King, A Proposal for the Effective
International Regulation of Biomedical Research
Involving Human Subjects, 34 STAN. J. INT'L L. 163
(1998).
Eric S. Lander, Scientific Commentary: The Scientific
Foundations and Medical and Social Prospects of the
Human Genome Project, 26 J.L. MED. & ETHICS 184
(1998).
Thomas A. Magnani, The Patentability of Human-Animal
Chimeras, 14 BERKELEY TECH. L.J 443 (1999).
Shiela A.M. McLean, Controlling the Future? -- Human
Rights and Biotechnology, 6 MAASTRICHT J. EUR. &
COMP. L. 299 (1999).
Heather S. Meingast, Cosmeceuticals: Hope in a Jar?, 2
J. MED. & L. 129 (1998).
Dorothy Nelkin & Lori B. Andrews, Introduction: The
Body, Economic Power and Social Control, 75 CHI.-KENT
L. REV. 3 (1999).
Mary Z. Pelias, Genetic Testing: Who Decides, Who
Informs?, CHILDREN'S LEGAL RTS. J., Spring 1999, at
21.
Mary Z. Pelias & Margaret M. DeAngelis, The New
Genetic Technologies: New Options, New Hope, and
New Challenges, 45 LOY. L. REV. 287 (1999).
Gary Pulsinelli, The Orphan Drug Act: What's Right
With It?, 15 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH.
L.J. 299 (1999).
Michael J. Reiss, What Sort of People Do We Want?
The Ethics of Changing People Through Genetic
Engineering, 13 NOTRE DAME J.L. ETHICS & PUB.
POL'Y 63 (1999).
M.A. Roberts, Cloning and Harming: Children, Future
Persons, and the "Best Interest" Test, 13 NOTRE DAME
J.L. ETHICS & PUB. POL'Y 37 (1999).
Elisabeth Rosen, The Dolly-Dollar Dichotomy: Animal
Cloning Restrictions and the Competitiveness of the
European Biotech Industry, 67 NORDIC J. INT'L L. 423
(1998).
Giuseppe Sena, Directive on Biotechnological
Inventions: Patentability of Discoveries, 30 INT'L REV.
INDUS. PROP. & COPYRIGHT L. 731 (1999).
George P. Smith, II, Judicial Decisionmaking in the Age
of Biotechnology, 13 NOTRE DAME J.L. ETHICS & PUB.
POL'Y 93 (1999).
Vincent F. Stempel, Procreative Rights in Assisted
Reproductive Technology: Why the Angst?, 62 ALB. L.
REV. 1187 (1999).
Allyn L. Taylor, Globalization and Biotechnology:
UNESCO and an International Strategy to Advance
Human Rights and Public Health, 25 AM. J.L. & MED.
479 (1999).
Amy White, Bovine Somatotropin (BST) and Dairy
Cattle, 2 J. MED. & L. 151 (1998).
Peter G. Wood, To What Extent Can the Law Control
Human Cloning?, 39 MED., SCI. & L. 5 (1999).
10.6 Environmental Law
10.6.0 General
Robert W. Adler, Toward Comprehensive Watershed-Based
Restoration and Protection for Great Salt Lake,
1999 UTAH L. REV. 99 (1999).
Laurie Dichiara, Wireless Communication Facilities:
Siting for Sore Eyes, 6 BUFF. ENVTL. L.J. 1 (1998).
Ved P. Nanda, The Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change
and the Challenges to Its Implementation: A
Commentary, 10 COLO. J. INT'L ENVTL. L. & POL'Y 319
(1999).
Harry N. Scheiber & Christopher J. Carr, From
Extended Jurisdiction to Privatization: International
Law, Biology, and Economics in the Marine Fisheries
Debates, 1937-1976, 16 BERKELEY J. INT'L L. 10
(1998).
10.6.1 Pollution
Kristin L. Falzone, Comment, Airport Noise Pollution:
Is There a Solution in Sight?, 26 B.C. ENVTL. AFF. L.
REV. 769 (1999).
Taly L. Jolish, Note, Negotiating the Smog Away, 18
VA. ENVTL. L.J. 305 (1999).
James Kavanaugh, Comment, To Filter or Not to Filter:
A Discussion and Analysis of the Massachusetts
Filtration Conflict in the Context of the Safe Water
Drinking Act, 26 B.C. ENVTL. AFF. L. REV. 809 (1999).
10.6.2 Hazardous Substances
Lori May Peters, Comment, Reloading The Arsenal In
The Informational War On Pollution-Citizens As
Soldiers In The Fight And How A Lack Of "Actionable"
Legs On Which To Stand Nearly Forced A Cease-Fire,
10 VILL. ENVTL. L.J. 127 (1999).
Craig A. Stevens, Note, Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v.
Department of the Army: The Recovery of Medical
Monitoring Costs Under HSCA's Citizen Suit Provision,
10 VILL. ENVTL. L.J. 201 (1999).
10.6.3 Electromagnetic Fields
David R. Bolton & Kent A. Sick, Power Lines and
Property Values: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, 31
URB. LAW. 331 (1999).
10.6.4 Nuclear Technology
Christopher G. Barnes, Note, Commercial Power
Reactors for Defense Purposes: Tritium Production and
the United States' Disregard for Longstanding
Non-Proliferation Policy and International Integrity,
23 VT. L. REV. 201 (1998).
David Hodgkinson, Shelter from the Storm: Succession
and Demarcation Issues Under the ABM Treaty, 28 U.
W. AUSTL. L. REV. 162 (1999).
Lakshman D. Guruswamy & Jason B. Aamodt, Nuclear
Arms Control: The Environmental Dimension, 10 COLO.
J. INT'L ENVTL. L. & POL'Y 267 (1999).
10.6.5 Energy and the Environment
Shari R. DeSalvo, Note, Ozone Transport and the Clean
Air Act: The Answers Are Blowin' in the Wind, 46
CLEV. ST. L. REV. 355 (1998).
Anita Margrethe Halvorssen, Climate Change
Treaties--New Developments at the Buenos Aires
Conference, COLO. J. INT'L ENVTL. L. & POL'Y 1998
Y.B. 1 (1999).
David Mallery, Comment, Clean Energy and the Kyoto
Protocol: Applying Environmental Controls to
Grandfathered Power Facilities, 10 COLO. J. INT'L
ENVTL. L. & POL'Y 469 (1999).
Markus G. Puder, Trash, Ash, and the Phoenix: A Fifth
Anniversary Review of the Supreme Court's City of
Chicago Waste-to-Energy Combustion Ash Decision, 26
B.C. ENVTL. AFF. L. REV. 473 (1999).
Jorge G. Santistevan, Mexico: Current Developments in
Power (Electricity), 33 INT'L LAW. 737 (1999).
Mary Katherine Strahan, Comment, Connecting
Currents: Toward the Integration of North American
Electricity Markets, 21 HOUS. J. INT'L L. 291 (1999).
10.6.6 International Environmental Law Developments
Charles Davies et al., Moving Pictures: How Satellites,
the Internet, and International Environmental Law Can
Help Promote Sustainable Development, 28 STETSON L.
REV. 1091 (1999).
10.7 Television
10.7.0 General
Randi M. Albert, A New "Program for Action":
Strengthening the Standards for Noncommercial
Educational Licensees, 21 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT.
L.J. 129 (1998).
Clay Calbert, Toxic Television, Editorial Discretion, &
the Public Interest: A Rocky Mountain Low, 21
HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L.J. 163 (1998).
Berend Jan Drijber, The Revised Television Without
Frontiers Directive: Is it Fit for the Next Century?, 36
COMMON MKT. L. REV. 87 (1999).
Michael Furlong et al., The Effects of Media Violence
on Youth, CHILDREN'S LEGAL RTS. J., Summer 1999, at
33.
Bennett Haselton, Commentary: The Effects of the V-Chip,
CHILDREN'S LEGAL RTS. J., Summer 1999, at 65.
Lesley Hitchens, Broadcasting Law and Fundamental
Rights, 7 SOC. & LEGAL STUD. 599 (1998) (book
review).
Christopher T. Mardsen, Regulating Media Owners in
Digital Television: Lessons from U.K. Analogue Policy
Information, 17 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 659
(1999).
Monroe E. Price, Public Broadcasting and the Crisis of
Corporate Governance, 17 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.
J. 417 (1999).
Henry H. Rossbacher et al., An Invasion of Privacy: The
Media's Involvement in Law Enforcement Activities, 19
LOY. L.A. ENT. L.J. 313 (1999).
Marie A. Ryan, Note, To V or Not to V - That is the
Regulatory Question: The Role of the V-Chip in
Government Regulation of Broadcast and Cable
Indecency, 4 CARDOZO WOMEN'S L.J. 1 (1997).
10.7.1 Satellite Television
Paula Deza, Unfair and Unlawful: The Debate Over
Receiving Network Television Signals Through
Direct-To-Home Satellite Dishes, 7 COMM. L. CONSPECTUS
279 (1999).
10.7.2 Cable Television
Ed Foley, Comment, The First Amendment as Shield
and Sword: Content Control of PEG Access Cable
Television, 27 CAP. U. L. REV. 961 (1999).
Garnet M. Goins, Recognizing Congress' Interests in
Maintaining Competition Between Cable and Broadcast
in the Television Programming Market -- Turner
Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications
Commission, 117 S. Ct. 1174 (1997), 32 SUFFOLK U. L.
REV. 181 (1998).
Josh C. Grushkin, Note, Signal Bleed: Congress Attacks
When it Sounds Like Sex, 21 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT.
L.J. 501 (1999).
Jae-Young Kim, Empirical Testing on an Unasked
Question in Turner v. FCC: Do Must-Carry Rules
Enhance Diversity?, COMM. & L., June 1999, at 55.
10.8 Telecommunications
10.8.0 General
Kenneth C. Baldwin, The Telecommunications Act of
1996: Developing Caselaw of Towering Propositions,
31 URB. LAW. 555 (1999).
Simon Deakin & Stephen Pratten, Reinventing the
Market? Competition and Regulatory Change in
Broadcasting, 26 J.L. & SOC'Y 323 (1999).
Meade Emory et al., Food Services,
Telecommunications Provided to Tenants Were Real
Property Rents, 91 J. TAX'N 54 (1999).
Fatima Fofana, Comment, Creating a Diversity of
Voices: Local Expression Through a Low Power Radio
Service, 7 COMM. L. CONSPECTUS 409 (1999).
John A. Fortunato & Shannon E. Martin, The Courts v.
the FCC: Diversity and the Broadcast Provisions of the
1996 Telecommunications Act, COMM. & L., Sept.
1999, at 19.
Paul W. Garnett, Forward-Looking Costing
Methodologies and the Supreme Court's Takings Clause
Jurisprudence, 7 COMM. L. CONSPECTUS 119 (1999).
Hank Intven et al., Internet Telephony--The Regulatory
Issues, 21 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L.J. 1 (1998).
William E. Kennard, The Telecom Act at Three: Seeing
the Face of the Future, MEDIA L. & POL'Y, Spring
1999, at 1.
Louis Klein, National Basketball Association v.
Motorola Inc.: Future Prospects for Protecting RealTime
Information, 64 BROOK. L. REV. 585 (1998).
Markenzy LaPointe, Universal Service and the Digital
Revolution: Beyond the Telecommunications Act of
1996, 25 RUTGERS COMPUTER & TECH. L.J. 1 (1999).
Benjamin Lipshitz, Regulatory Treatment of Network
Convergence: Opportunities and Challenges in the
Digital Era, MEDIA L. & POL'Y, Fall 1998, at 14.
Matthew N. McClure, Comment, Working Through the
Static: Is There Anything Left to Local Control in the
Siting of Cellular and PCS Towers After the
Telecommunications Act of 1996?, 44 VILL. L. REV.
781 (1999).
Gesner Oliveira et al., Regulation and Competition
Policy: Towards an Optimal Institutional Configuration
in the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry, 25
BROOK. J. INT'L L. 311 (1999).
10.8.1 Telephone
Mark Allan Baginskis, Telemarketing Fraud Upon the
Elderly Shows No Signs of Slowing, 11 LOY.
CONSUMER L. REV. 4 (1999).
Seth A. Cohen, Deregulation, Defragmenting &
Interconnecting: Reconsidering Commercial
Telecommunication Regulation in Relation to the Rise
of Internet Telephony, 18 J.L. & COM. 133 (1998).
Charles D. Cosson, You Say You Want a Revolution?
Fact and Fiction Regarding Broadband CMRS and
Local Competition, 7 COMM. L. CONSPECTUS 233
(1999).
Rex S. Heinke & Seth M.M. Stodder, Punishing
Truthful, Newsworthy Disclosures: The
Unconstitutional Application of the Federal Wiretap
Statute, 19 LOY. L.A. ENT. L.J. 279 (1999).
Michael L. Landsman, From Enemies of the Crown to
Regional Telephone Companies: Bills of Attainder Fee
Appraised, 15 TOURO L. REV. 759 (1999).
Stacy L. Mills, Note, He Wouldn't Listen to Me Before,
but Now ...: Interpersonal Wiretapping and an
Analysis of State Wiretapping Statutes, 37 BRANDEIS
L.J. 415 (1898-99).
Matthew Mickle Werdegar, Lost? The Government
Knows Where You Are: Cellular Telephone Call
Location Technology and the Expectation of Privacy, 10
STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 103 (1998).
T. Jason White, Tearing Down a Fence that is Hog
Tight, Horse High & Bull Strong: The Supreme Court
Reshapes Jurisdiction of Local Telephone Markets, 11
LOY. CONSUMER L. REV. 188 (1999).
10.8.2 Multimedia in Telecommunications
10.8.3 International Telecommunications Developments
Rolf Auf der Maur, Internet Distribution of Music
Performances, 27 INT'L BUS. LAW. 165 (1999).
Ravi Chandran, Singapore's Electronic Transactions
Act 1998, 1999 J. BUS. L., at 80.
Rachelle B. Chong & Wendy Chow, Financial
Telecommunications Projects in Asia: A Promising
Regulatory Perspective, 52 FED. COMM. L.J. 1 (1999).
Martin C. Glass & David M. Rhodes, Catching the
Wave: Should Canada Follow the Global Trend Toward
Spectrum Auctions?, 44 MCGILL L.J. 141 (1999).
Klaus W. Grelich, "Cyberspace": Sector-Specific
Regulation and Competition Rules in European
Telecommunications, 36 COMMON MKT. L. REV. 937
(1999).
Lawrence A. Sullivan, The U.S., the EU, the WTO, the
Americas, and Telecom Competition, 6 SW. J.L. &
TRADE AM. 63 (1999).
11. OTHERS
11.0 General
Robert J. Condlin, "What's Really Going On?" A Study
of Lawyer and Scientist Inter-Disciplinary Discourse,
25 RUTGERS COMPUTER & TECH. L.J. 181 (1999).
Mary Eberle, Comment, March-In Rights Under the
Bayh-Doyle Act: Public Access to Federally Funded
Research, 3 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 155 (1999).
Kara Hagen, An Essay on Women and Intellectual
Property Law: The Challenges Faced By Female
Attorneys Pursuing Careers in Intellectual Property, 15
SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 139
(1998).
Michelle J. Kane, Blumenthal v. Drudge, 14 BERKELEY
TECH. L.J. 483 (1999).
Graham Walker, Managing the E-Mail Monster, J.L.
SOC'Y SCOT., Jun. 1999, at 39.
Erik Jaap Molenaar, Airports at Sea: International
Legal Implications, 14 INT'L J. MARINE & COASTAL L.
371 (1999).
Lieutenant Colonel Michael A. Rodgers, Preventive
Law Programs: A Swift Approach, 47 A.F.L. REV. 111
(1999).
F. M. Scherer, Global Growth Through Third World
Technological Progress, ISSUES SCI. & TECH., Fall
1999, at 31.
Peter P. Swire, Of Elephants, Mice, and Privacy:
International Choice of Law and the Internet, 32 INT'L
L. 991 (1998).
Maureen A. Tighe & Emily Rosenblum, "What Do You
Mean, I Filed for Bankruptcy?" -- Or How the Law
Allows a Perfect Stranger to Purchase an Automatic
Stay in Your Name, 32 LOY. L.A L. REV. 1009 (1999).
11.1 Y2K Issues
Richard L. Antognini, Fortuity, Reinsurers and Year
2000 Problem: Will These Theories Carry the Day?, 66
DEFENSE COUNSEL J. 253 (1999).
Oliver J. Armas, Y2K and Product Liability in the
United States, 11 INT'L L. PRACTICUM 88 (1998).
Mark B. Baker, The Sky is Falling (or is it?):
International Contracts and the Y2K Problem, 32
VAND. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 347 (1999).
Holly M. Barbara, The Y2K Problem and Breaks in the
Supply Chain: Can the Wrath of the Bug Be Squashed?,
24 DEL. J. CORP. L. 2 (1999).
Travis C. Barton & Brian S. Engel, State & Federal
Year 2000 Litigation, 18 REV. OF LIT. 487 (1999).
Thomas Baxter & Stephanie Heller, Commercial Law
Issues Arising From the Y2K Problem, 32 UCC L.J. 3
(1999).
Jack E. Brown, Portents of the Year 2000 Problem, 15
SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 109
(1998).
Bill Butcher et al., The Year 2000 Computer Problem:
Tax Aspects of Compliance Costs, INT'L TAX J., Spring
1999, at 45.
Andrew S. Crouch, Comment, When the Millennium
Bug Bites: Business Liability in the Wake of the Y2K
Problem, 22 HAMLINE L. REV. 797 (1999).
Joseph A. D'Amico, Only Months To Go: Are Your
Clients Ready for Y2K?, 24 INT'L LEGAL PRAC. 51
(1999).
Dean Ellison, Year 2000 Information Disclosure Act
1999 (Cth) Explained, 27 AUSTL. BUS. L. REV. 262
(1999).
Otis Felder "Y2K Bug" Dead Ahead: A Primer for
Admiralty, 11 U.S.F. MAR. L.J. 137 (1998).
James C. Fontana, The Millennium Bug: Digital
Apocalypse Now? 17 TEMP. ENVTL. L. & TECH. J. 15
(1998).
James C. Gray III & Kathy R. Davis, Insurance
Coverage of Potential Year 2000 Claims, 23 AM. J.
TRIAL ADVOC. 49 (1999).
Mark Grossman & JoAnn Nesta, Causes of Action on
and off the Contract in Year 2000 Litigation, 18 REV.
OF LIT. 553 (1999).
James Blythe Hodge et al., Legal Aspects of the Year
2000 Problem, 39 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 657 (1999).
Marvin E. Jacob et al., Warding Off the Millenium Bug:
A Survey of 1998's Y2K Solutions, 116 BANKING L.J.
130 (1999).
Carole K. Jeffery, Directors' Liability for Year 2000
Failures, PREV. L. REP., Winter/Spring 1998/1999, at
35.
Jeff Jinnett, Legal Issues Concerning the Year 2000
Computer Problem, 27 INT'L BUS. L. 101 (1999).
Andrew Lothian, E-Commerce: Debugging Legacy
Legislation, J.L. SOC'Y SCOT., Oct. 1999, at 26.
Dorian S. Mazurkevich, Copyright Infringement in
Computer Software Repair: Fixing the "Year 2000
Problem" Without Liability, 72 TEMP. L. REV. 197
(1999).
John P. McMahon, Y2K: Maritime Law and Commerce
Issues and Resources, 30 J. MAR. L. & COM. 627
(1999).
Cathy Moyer, Y2K: Is It Real? What Should I Be
Doing?, PREV. L. REP., Summer 1999, at 6.
Michael P. Murphy and Aidan M. McCormack,
Challenging Insurance Coverage for Year 2000
Computer Failure Claims, 34 TORT & INSUR. L.J. 883
(1999).
Mark A. Murtha, The Law of Y2K: An Introduction, 17
TEMP. ENVTL. L. & TECH. J. 1 (1998).
Howard L. Nations et al., Legal Implications of the
Millenium Bug: The Multiple Roles of Lawyers in
Coping With the Fallout From the Trillion-Dollar
Computer Glitch, 18 REV. OF LIT. 417 (1999).
Daniel W. Patterson, Advising Clients Regarding Fear
2000 Compliance, PREV. L. REP., Winter/Spring 1998-1999,
at 4.
Michael K. Powell, Why F2K?: Challenges for the
Communications Industry, 7 COMM. L. CONSPECTUS 3
(1999).
Michael Sean Quinn, Fortuity, Insurance, and Y2K, 18
REV. OF LIT. 487 (1999).
Frank C. Razzano, The Litigator's Dream Come True:
The Year 2000, 27 SEC. REG. L.J. 247 (1999).
John M. Redmond, A Simple Plan: How Corporate
America Prepares for Y2K Litigation, PREV. L. REP.,
Winter/Spring 1998-99, at 33.
Andrew M. Reidy & Robert L. Carter, Jr., Is Insurance
the Cure for the Millenium Bug?, PREV. L. REP.,
Winter/Spring 1998-99, at 15.
Clark Richards, Information Technology and Y2K
Litigation, 18 REV. OF LIT. 621 (1999).
Robert Rosen, Fear 2000 Risk Management: So Much
To Do, So Little Time, 17 TEMP. ENVTL. L. & TECH. J.
25 (1998).
Stephen M. Rutner, Key Dates of the Y2K Problem, 66
J. TRANSP. L., LOGISTICS & POL'Y 234 (1999).
Stephen M. Rutner & G. Benjamin Thompson IV, Steps
Transportation Companies Should Consider to Reduce
Year 2000 Liability, 66 J. TRANSP. L., LOGISTICS &
POL'Y 115 (1998).
Martha A. Sabol & Beth Diebold, Readiness and
Responsibility in the Year 2000: A Look at Y2K
Legislation, 11 LOY. CONSUMER L. REV. 217 (1999).
Hon. D. Brooks Smith, The Managerial Judge and Y2K
Litigation, 18 REV. OF LIT. 403 (1999).
Stephen Wallenstein, Year 2000 Compliance - Directors'
and Officers' Year 2000 Liability, PREV. L.
REP., Winter/Spring 1998-99, at 41.
Kelly Ann Breuer Weist, Year 2000 Vendor Compliance
Programs and Legal Audits, PREV. L. REP.,
Winter/Spring 1998-99, at 11.
Taylor C. Young, Comment, Turning Back the Clock on
the Millenium Bug: Trigger of Coverage for "Year
2000" Claims Under CGL Occurrence Policies, ARIZ.
ST. L.J., Spring 1999, at 259.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion