They Came from Within: a History of Canadian Horror Cinema.They Came from Within: A History of Canadian Horror Cinema by Caelum Vatnsdal, Arbeiter Ring Publishing, Winnipeg, 2004. 256 pages. $28.95. Caelum Vatnsdal's eminently readable and highly entertaining They Came from Within: A History of Canadian Horror Cinema offers up a fairly exhaustive account of Canadian efforts in the horror film genre, stretching from a 1913 13-minute silent film called The Werewolf werewolf: see lycanthropy. werewolf In European folklore, a man who changes into a wolf at night and devours animals, people, or corpses, returning to human form by day. to recent additions such as Dracula: Pages from a Virgin's Diary and Ginger Snaps. The book isn't exactly a dry, purely factual history, which you'd hardly expect, or even want, given the subject. The tone is largely anecdotal. As Vatnsdal admits from the outset, there is a history of horror film in Canada but it's a checkered one, with failures far outweighing successes; and the stories about the making of the films sometimes boast more entertainment value than the films themselves. Fortunately, Vatnsdal manfully man·ful adj. Having or showing the bravery and resoluteness considered characteristic of a man. See Synonyms at male. man ful·ly adv. resists the temptations to
turn the book into a camp laugh-test or over praise the obscurities he
lovingly describes. (Although some may wonder about comparing the
director of Spasms, William Fruet, to Ernest Hemingway; and I don't
recall anyone referring to Pin as "a towering achievement.")
Even when the films are weak or seriously flawed, which he readily
admits, he treats them with a modicum of seriousness, although he does
toss in his share of jokey jok·ey also jok·y adj. jok·i·er, jok·i·est Characterized by joking or jokes, especially stale or clumsy jokes: jokey bumper stickers. asides and a few goofy, often charming suggestions on how certain films might have been improved. Pleasantly, this is a non-auteurist book, with Vatnsdal describing how horror filmmakers were typically hamstrung by the lack of proper special effects and experienced makeup people until the 1980s. They Came from Within essentially consists of short discussions about the films, with significantly more space devoted to works Vatnsdal considers crucial either for historical or aesthetic reasons, such as Julian Roffman's The Mask, Gilbert W. Taylor's Dr. Frankenstein on Campus (a.k.a. Flick), Bob Clark's Black Christmas, Ivan Reitman's Cannibal Girls, Peter Medak's The Changeling, Peter Carter's Rituals, George Mihalka's My Bloody Valentine, the four entries in the Prom Night series, Sandor Stern's Pin and most--though not all--of the early Cronenberg oeuvre. He also tosses in a mix of lost films and oddities such as Oliver Stone's Seizure; Lawrence Zazelenchuk's Sudbury-shot zombie movie, The Corpse Eaters; Jack Bravman's Zombie Nightmare and its two follow-ups, Rock 'n' Roll rock 'n' roll: see rock music. Nightmare and Black Roses; and Bob Clark's first horror effort, The Night Walk. As Vatnsdal paints it, the history of Canadian horror is, for the most part, a history of amateurs taking risks, with a cornucopia cornucopia (kôr'ny kō`pēə), in Greek mythology, magnificent horn that filled itself with whatever meat or drink its owner requested. of
recalcitrant crews, shady producers horning horn·ing n. Upstate New York, Northern Pennsylvania, & Western New England See shivaree. See Regional Note at shivaree. [Probably because horns are blown at the shivaree.] their way into undeserved un·de·served adj. Not merited; unjustifiable or unfair. un de·serv director's credits, inexperienced producers and financiers failing
to read the fine print (that in some cases included the script) and
wound up with art films instead of blood and gore, and equally
inexperienced directors who thought the producers would understand
that's what they were up to. There were neophyte ne·o·phyte n. 1. A recent convert to a belief; a proselyte. 2. A beginner or novice: a neophyte at politics. 3. a. Roman Catholic Church A newly ordained priest. filmmakers who were ripped-off by Hollywood studios and suffered from pervasive critical neglect or usually blatant contempt, indifference and often outright hostility from the public and government funding bodies (no doubt one of the major reasons why the woefully woe·ful also wo·ful adj. 1. Affected by or full of woe; mournful. 2. Causing or involving woe. 3. Deplorably bad or wretched: underfunded un·der·fund tr.v. un·der·fund·ed, un·der·fund·ing, un·der·funds To provide insufficient funding for. underfunded adj → infradotado (económicamente) shoots were often unprofessional), greed and stupidity. Significantly, this state of affairs wasn't confined to the tax-shelter years, but also included the video boom of the late 1980s and early 1990s, a period Vatnsdal considers even more pathetic and far less charming. Vatnsdal repeatedly rails against the cultural conservatism of the Canadian film industry and Canadian film criticism in general. For him, there is nothing particularly un-Canadian--or especially American--about horror films. In fact, Vatnsdal is pretty adept at tweaking tweaking Vox populi Fine-tuning to produce optimal results our often pompous assumptions about the United States and our belief that we are a kinder, gentler version. Interestingly, he argues that the realist and documentary instincts that many of the earlier horror filmmakers, like Roffman, brought with them following their stints at the NFB NFB National Federation of the Blind NFB National Film Board of Canada NFB Negative Feedback NFB No Fuse Breaker NFB Normal for Bridgewater (music album) were, to some degree, beneficial. These rather telling criticisms about our own cultural presumptions, the wealth of arcane detail, and Vatnsdal's obvious love for the subject make They Came from Within compulsively readable. |
|
||||||||||||||

ful·ly adv.
kō`pēə)
de·serv
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion