Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,635,994 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

They're not tough enough to do what's right.


There's this thing that happens when politicians lose an election: They don't become introspective in·tro·spect  
intr.v. in·tro·spect·ed, in·tro·spect·ing, in·tro·spects
To engage in introspection.



[Latin intr
 and try to figure out where they went wrong. Instead, they blame their staff, and heads roll.

Is that what's going on What's Going On is a record by American soul singer Marvin Gaye. Released on May 21, 1971 (see 1971 in music), What's Going On reflected the beginning of a new trend in soul music.  with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger (German pronunciation (IPA): [ˈaɐ̯nɔlt ˈaloɪ̯s ˈʃvaɐ̯ʦənˌʔɛɡɐ] ? The four initiatives he supported in the November election tanked. Then, the Republican governor announced that Chief of Staff Pat Clarey, who worked for former GOP Gov. Pete Wilson For others named Pete Wilson, see .
Peter Barton Wilson (born August 23, 1933) is an American Republican politician from California. Wilson served as the thirty-sixth Governor of California (1991–1999), the culmination of more than three decades in the public arena that
 before signing on with Arnold, is leaving and will be replaced by Susan Kennedy, who worked for recalled Democratic Gov. Gray Davis.

Team Arnold says the change does not represent a shift to the left. Clarey had been planning on leaving for months, the governor said. Susan Kennedy is as smart as a laptop and a Hummer-weight heavy in politics.

This is about competence.

To reinforce that point, Wilson called to tell me what a swell hire Kennedy is. Kennedy delivered "the best speech I've ever heard" on business deregulation Deregulation

The reduction or elimination of government power in a particular industry, usually enacted to create more competition within the industry.

Notes:
Traditional areas that have been deregulated are the telephone and airline industries.
, said the former governor. And, I'll add, Kennedy is so pro-business that many Democrats don't trust her.

In another sense, Kennedy represents a pattern: She worked for a Democrat who wouldn't do the tough stuff to fix the state budget. Now she'll work for a Republican who won't do the tough stuff to fix the state budget.

I voted for Schwarzenegger--I want to him to succeed. I appreciate that he has pushed through workers' compensation workers' compensation, payment by employers for some part of the cost of injuries, or in some cases of occupational diseases, received by employees in the course of their work.  reform. I also understand that his poll numbers began to fall when he started doing the hard part of his job.

Remember when Schwarzenegger (tightly) called for a big shift in pensions for state and municipal employees, because local governments simply can't afford to pay out what they've promised? Public-employee unions turned on him.

They noted that a reform measure he supported left out death-and-disability benefits--something easily corrected with new legislation. Even though Schwarzenegger's remedy would have saved the state from fiscal anguish, his popularity suffered.

So Schwarzenegger walked away from the issue. The state and municipalities will have to pay out increasing percentages of their general funds to people who no longer work for them. Fat pension benefits will force cities and counties to cut compensation for the people who do the work.

Because the governor failed to lead and didn't bother to sell his position, he fell down on the job.

Jon Coupal of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association helped sponsor Proposition 13, the property tax-cutting initiative in California in 1978 which slashed property taxes by fifty-seven percent and initiated a national tax revolt. It was founded by California republican Howard Jarvis.  credits Schwarzenegger for his record on taxes: "What he's done up to this point has not been bad," Coupal said. "He has pledged fidelity to Proposition 13. He has not raised taxes. He has cut the car tax." Besides, it's not easy for a Republican to cut spending when the Legislature tilts to the left.

OK, but no one said the job would be easy. Now that state tax revenues are rebounding, it will be even harder to cut spending--despite the $4 billion structural deficit. In fact, Schwarzenegger is touting a mega-bond to rebuild the state's infrastructure--a fine idea, if he also could cut unnecessary programs.

"Our concern is this: There's tons of revenue coming into the state now," Coupal noted. "It has the potential of being Gray Davis redux Refers to being brought back, revived or restored. From the Latin "reducere." , and that we learned nothing from the dot-com boom-and-bust."

I blame voters for this: They don't want tax hikes. They don't want shortfalls. Even though spending increases created the budget deficit, they don't want program cuts.

Meanwhile, Democrats say voters can get more government services by making the rich pay for them--which isn't true--while Republicans insist on no tax increases, but won't curb spending. I think Schwarzenegger should not have rescinded the entire vehicle license fee raised by Davis.

One reason voters believe they can get something for nothing is that they keep electing big spenders Noun 1. big spender - one who spends lavishly and ostentatiously on entertainment; "the last of the big spenders"
high roller

scattergood, spend-all, spendthrift, spender - someone who spends money prodigally
, who inflate inflate - deflate  spending but not taxes.

Who cares if Kennedy signals a shift to the left? These days, it doesn't matter which party is in power--neither one will do the heavy lifting.

Debra J. Saunders is a columnist at the San Francisco Chronicle The San Francisco Chronicle was founded in 1865 as The Daily Dramatic Chronicle by teenage brothers Charles de Young and Michael H. de Young.[2] The paper grew along with San Francisco to become the largest circulation newspaper on the West Coast of the .
COPYRIGHT 2005 CBJ, L.P.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:beating the heat in the election
Comment:They're not tough enough to do what's right.(beating the heat in the election)
Author:Saunders, Debra J.
Publication:Los Angeles Business Journal
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 12, 2005
Words:664
Previous Article:Bring on the bus: the heat's on light rail, but there's a better way.
Next Article:What about West Hollywood?(Letter to the Editor)
Topics:



Related Articles
Truth or Distortion?(thoughts about recount situation in Florida)(Brief Article)(Editorial)
Presidential Blowup.(the 2000 election is likened to a Michelangelo Antonioni film)
November 2002: The shape of the Senate.
LET TRAGEDY BE LESSON TO LOCAL COACHES.(Sports)
Beavers look to keep afloat after drubbing.(Sports)
JETHAWKS NOTEBOOK: QUAKES DOING A WHOLE LOT OF SHAKIN' TO CAL LEAGUE.(NEWS)
Getting a gauge on election season. (LABJ Forum).(Brief Article)
EDITORIAL ELECTION DOUBT.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Risky business: during this highly polarized election year, leading a church through the tricky waters of partisan politics is a difficult task. Here...
EDITORIAL BUYING CITY HALL WHY L.A. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS RAISE BIG BUCKS FOR EASY RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGNS.(Editorial)(Editorial)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles