Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,678,926 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

The use of a GIS to compare the land areas captured by very basic and complex wellhead protection area models.


* It is estimated that over 65 percent of Washington State citizens rely on groundwater as a source of drinking water drinking water

supply of water available to animals for drinking supplied via nipples, in troughs, dams, ponds and larger natural water sources; an insufficient supply leads to dehydration; it can be the source of infection, e.g. leptospirosis, salmonellosis, or of poisoning, e.g.
.

* In some counties, the numbers approach 100 percent.

* The delineation of wellhead well·head  
n.
1. The source of a well or stream.

2. A principal source; a fountainhead.

3. The structure built over a well.


wellhead
Noun

1.
 protection areas (WHPAs) is a proactive method of protecting the land areas around public water supply wells.

* A wellhead protection area is commonly defined as the surface and subsurface area that surrounds a well field, well, or spring that supplies a public drinking-water system.

* The Washington State Department of Health (WSDOH WSDOH Washington State Department of Health ) accepts four methods for the delineation of these areas:

1. the calculated-fixed-radius (CFR CFR

See: Cost and Freight
) method,

2. the analytical method,

3. hydrogeologic mapping, and

4. the numerical flow/transport model.

* The analytical, hydrogeologic, and numerical models are generally considered to be superior to the CFR model.

* The hydrogeologic and numerical models are considered to be more sophisticated than the analytical model.

* The study reported here utilized a geographic information system geographic information system (GIS)

Computerized system that relates and displays data collected from a geographic entity in the form of a map. The ability of GIS to overlay existing data with new information and display it in colour on a computer screen is used primarily to
 (GIS) to compare the very basic CFR method with other methods for water systems in Whatcom County, Washington Whatcom County (IPA: [ʍɑt kəm]) is a county located in the U.S. state of Washington. Its name ultimately derives from a Nooksack word meaning "noisy water."[1] As of 2000, the population was 166,814. .

* The 1-, 5-, and 10-year overall comparison averages show that the CFR and hydrogeologic GIS overlays were the most similar for each of the three study comparison areas.

* The CFR and the analytical methods produced the least similar overlays.

* These results allow for more confidence in the CFR method, especially for areas closer to a well.

* Local health and planning departments can provide public wells with a level of protection by simply using the CFR method, either as an interim measure or as a final model.

* A local health department working toward permanent or interim protection for public drinking-water-system wellheads might adopt the following procedure:

1. establish a GIS with standard base maps,

2. map the location of any public supply wells with a global positioning system Global Positioning System: see navigation satellite.
Global Positioning System (GPS)

Precise satellite-based navigation and location system originally developed for U.S. military use.
,

3. buffer these wells according to the volumetric volumetric /vol·u·met·ric/ (vol?u-met´rik) pertaining to or accompanied by measurement in volumes.

vol·u·met·ric
adj.
Of or relating to measurement by volume.
 CFR method in GIS,

4. add any noncircular (more-advanced-model) wellhead protection areas to the GIS, and

5. work with the local water systems and any local or state agencies to recognize the wellhead protection areas in land use decisions.
COPYRIGHT 2005 National Environmental Health Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Practical Stuff!; geographic information systems
Publication:Journal of Environmental Health
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 1, 2005
Words:343
Previous Article:Unplanned releases and injuries associated with aerial application of chemicals, 1995-2002.(Practical Stuff!)
Next Article:Unplanned releases and injuries associated with aerial application of chemicals, 1995-2002.(Library Corner)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Geographic information systems: their use in environmental epidemiological research.
Using GIS to investigate septic system sites and nitrate pollution potential.(geographic information systems)
Keeping a company's head above water through geographics.(Brief Article)
High-tech maps: how to get here from there. (Social Studies & Science).(Brief Article)
GIS improvements allow prediction of disaster risks, both natural and manmade.(Products & Services)(Geographic information systems)(Brief Article)
GIS--a proven tool for public health analysis.(Guest Commentary)(Geographic information systems)
GIS: a tool to locate new park and recreation services: new technology can help park and recreation managers learn more about their park...
The use of a GIS to compare the land areas captured by very basic and complex wellhead protection area models.(FEATURES)
Research update: technology lends a helping hand: recreation managers are learning the benefits of using geospatial technologies in resource...
The introduction and expansion of GIS into a small local health department drinking-water program.(FEATURES)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles