Printer Friendly

The problem with SEPs.

Simplified employee pensions (SEPs) are frequently promoted by investment advisers as "no-cost" substitutes for qualified profitsharing plans. Likewise, salary reduction SEPs (SARSEPs) are promoted as "no cost" alternatives to Sec. 401(k) plans. While there are certain similarities in the applicable rules, SEPs and SARSEPs are subject to special rules and limitations not applicable to qualified plans that are often misunderstood or misinter-preted by the person (usually not a professional adviser) "administering" the SEP program.

The misunderstandings that seem to occur most frequently include:

* Coverage of part-time employees: Unlike a qualified plan (in which employees who always work less than 1,000 hours a year may be excluded), a SEP arrangement must cover part-time employees (except for the limited exclusion for employees who make less than $396 (as indexed) during the year).

* Coverage of terminated employees: A SEP arrangement must cover all employees who are eligible at any time during the year. Qualified plans are usually structured to exclude employees whose employment terminates before completion of 500 hours (standardized plans) or who are not employed on the last day of the year (nonstandardized plans).

* Permitted disparity: The IRS version of the SEP document (Form 5305 SEP) does not provide for integration with Social Security, although some institutional SEP documents do so provide.

* Fiscal years: The Service's version of the SEP document requires use of a calendar plan year (although a few institutional forms provide for election of a fiscal year).

* Controlled groups/other plans: The IRS SEP document may not be used (1) unless all members of a controlled or affiliated service group adopt the SEP, (2) if the employer currently maintains any qualified plan or (3) if the employer ever maintained a defined benefit pension plan.

* SARSEP limits: The SARSEP alternative to a qualified Sec. 401(k) plan is only available if the employer has 25 or fewer eligible employees (tested on the basis of prior year demographics) and only if at least 50% of the eligible employees elect to participate (contribute). Neither of these limits applies to qualified Sec. 401(k) plans.

* ADP test: In applying the Sec. 401(k) ADP test to SARSEPs, the "times 2/plus 2%" alternative limitation is not available (i.e., a SARSEP must always comply with the "1.25 times" general rule). In addition, each highly compensated employee's deferral is limited to the "1.25 times" test percentage, as opposed to the averaging of highly compensated employee percentages allowed for Sec. 401(k) plans.

* No matching or QNECs: No matching contributions are allowed to a SARSEP, and excess deferrals cannot be corrected with qualified nonelective contributions (QNECs).

* Top-heavy rules applicable: The top-heavy 3% minimum contribution requirement is applicable to SEPs and SARSEPs, a commonly overlooked requirement in top-heavy "salary reduction only" SARSEPs when a 3% or more salary reduction contribution by a key employee triggers a minimum 3% "profit sharing" contribution. Note that the employer has to "elect" if it wants to test SEP top-heaviness on the basis of aggregate contributions rather than aggregate account balances. Note also that under the IRS SARSEP document (Form 5305ASEP), the plan is automatically deemed to be top-heavy, therefore requiring profit-sharing contributions whenever a key employee contributes.

* 15% individual limit: The maximum combined contribution for any one individual in a SEP or SARSEP is 15% of compensation, while in qualified plans the individual allocation limit is 25% of compensation (subject in all cases to a $30,000 maximum).

* Greater exposure to creditors: Assets in SEPs do not enjoy the protection from creditors afforded assets in qualified retirement plans.

* No life insurance: Unlike qualified plans, SEPs may not be invested in life insurance policies.

Conclusion

By their very nature and perhaps due to the compliance requirements, virtually all qualified plans have someone involved in their administration who has at least a passing knowledge of the applicable rules. SEPs and SARSEPs are all too often "administered" by the client's payroll department or by a financial adviser who lacks the training and experience to monitor the program's compliance with the many nuances related to SEPs and SARSEPs.
COPYRIGHT 1995 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1995, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:simplified employee pensions
Author:Peterson, John M.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Aug 1, 1995
Words:678
Previous Article:Short-term rental not qualified for APRRE.
Next Article:Failure to file election with return fatal to sec. 1042 deferral.
Topics:


Related Articles
The cost of success: the top-heavy Sec. 401(k) plan.
Running bonuses through SEPs.
Deferring income by adopting a SEP.
Retirement plan options.
Financial savvy for the self-employed: planning ahead for your retirement can reap high rewards.
Small business act: S corporation relief and pension plan reform.
Pension Preservation. (AICPA Activities).
Small business compliance tools.
IRAs and 401(k)s: how to pick the best plan; help your firm - or your clients - make the right choice.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters