Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,632,879 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

The price of life.


Federal regulations impose huge costs but save few lives--even in theory.

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS REquiring school districts to remove asbestos insulation from approximately 110,000 school buildings across the country. A study from the Washington, D.C., environmental think tank Resources for the Future finds that the $6 billion school districts must spend might save 125 lives.

In their study, economists Maureen Cropper CROPPER, contracts. One who, having no interest in the land, works it in consideration of receiving a portion of the crop for his labor. 2 Rawle, R. 12.  of the University of Maryland University of Maryland can refer to:
  • University of Maryland, College Park, a research-extensive and flagship university; when the term "University of Maryland" is used without any qualification, it generally refers to this school
 and George Van Houtven of East Carolina University East Carolina University is a public, coeducational, intensive research university located in Greenville, North Carolina, United States. Named East Carolina University by statue and commonly known as ECU or East Carolina  examined regulations under three environmental laws: the asbestos ban under the Toxic Substances Control Act The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA, often pronounced "taa-ska") is a United States law, passed by the United States Congress in 1976, that regulates the introduction of new or already existing chemicals. ; pesticides regulated by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act

regulations administered by the (US) Environmental Protection Agency which regulate dispensing and use of pesticides.
 from 1975 to 1989; and air pollutants governed by the Clean Air Act from 1975 to 1990. They used Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), independent agency of the U.S. government, with headquarters in Washington, D.C. It was established in 1970 to reduce and control air and water pollution, noise pollution, and radiation and to ensure the safe handling and  estimates of the number of people who would develop fatal cancers from involuntary exposure to the substances and the costs those regulations imposed.

Preventing involuntary exposure to avoid the theoretical additional case of cancer costs plenty: The authors estimate that the asbestos ban cost consumers $49 million for each life saved; the 19 pesticides examined cost $51.5 million per life saved. By contrast, concludes a 1989 article from the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, workers who voluntarily deal with hazardous substances demand only about $5 million in higher wages per statistical death to compensate for their risks--a substantial sum but a tenth of the regulatory costs.

The Clean Air Act prohibits the EPA EPA eicosapentaenoic acid.

EPA
abbr.
eicosapentaenoic acid


EPA,
n.pr See acid, eicosapentaenoic.

EPA,
n.
 from even considering the cost of regulations. Cropper and Van Houtven, however, suggest that prior to 1987 the agency was indeed considering costs before issuing regulations. Inhaling polluted air tends to be toxic only when the pollutants are heavily concentrated; it poses little risk at low levels. The EPA was not regulating such toxic substances as benzene and vinyl chloride unless exposure to them would cause more than one additional cancer death per 10,000 persons exposed. The authors estimate that regulations before 1987 cost $15 million per life saved. Since then, however, a court decision has required tighter controls. The result: Each cancer case now costs $194 million to avoid, money that could almost certainly save more lives elsewhere.
COPYRIGHT 1994 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1994, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Trends; costs of preventing illness from exposure to toxic substances
Author:Henderson, Rick
Publication:Reason
Date:Jun 1, 1994
Words:359
Previous Article:Family planning. (lawsuit against welfare reform) (Trends)
Next Article:What causes AIDS? It's an open question. (Cover Story)
Topics:



Related Articles
The health impact of hazardous waste sites on minority communities: implications for public health and environmental health professionals.
Chemical reaction. (hazardous effects of chemicals on human health)
EH update. (various developments in the field of environmental health)
A risk assessment in support of a facility wind tunnel study.
Providing adequate remedies to toxic tort victims.
National Environmental Health Association position on children's environmental health.
Environmental pesticide illness and injury: the need for a national surveillance system.
OSHA Record-Keeping and Posting Requirements.
Scientific Issues in Relation to Lakewide Management Plans: Linking Science and Policy.
EDITORIAL : MOVING ON THE AGREEMENT MEANS MORE MONEY SOONER FOR BURBANK RESIDENTS AFFECTED BY TOXICS.(Editorial)(Editorial)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles