Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,715,918 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

The meaning of "imminent".


If David Kay Dr. David A. Kay (born c. 1940) is an American best known for heading the Iraq Survey Group and acting as a weapons inspector in Iraq after the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. Education  is right in saying that there were no WMDs in Iraq last year, then the Iraqi threat could not have been imminent. Ah, but President Bush never claimed the threat was imminent, according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 White House spokesman Scott McClellan!

Question: "You have not used the word 'imminent threat.' And the essence of Dr. Kay's comments recently would suggest that there was no way for there to be an imminent threat Imminent threat is a standard criterion in international law, developed by Daniel Webster, for when the need for action is "instant, overwhelming, and leaving no choice of means, and no moment for deliberation. . Does the President now believe that, in fact, while the threat was gathering, while the threat may have been grave, that, in fact, it was not imminent?"

Answer: "I think we've said all along that it was a grave and gathering threat. And that in a post-September 11th world, you must confront gathering threats before it's too late. I think some in the media have chosen to use the word 'imminent.' Those were not words--"

Question: "The President himself never used that word?"

Answer: "Those were not words we used."

--White House spokesman Scott McClellan press briefing, January 27, 2004

Mr. McClellan's contention that President Bush never used the word "imminent" is" as silly as splitting hairs about the meaning of the word "is," as President Clinton once did. The reality is that, even if Mr. Bush did not actually use the word "imminent," he and others in the administration certainly described an imminent threat.

"[N]o terrorist state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people than the regime of Saddam Hussein Saddam Hussein

(born April 28, 1937, Tikrit, Iraq—died Dec. 30, 2006, Baghdad) President of Iraq (1979–2003). He joined the Ba'th Party in 1957. Following participation in a failed attempt to assassinate Iraqi Pres.
 and Iraq."

--Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee The term Armed Services Committee could refer to:
  • U.S. House Committee on Armed Services
  • U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services
, September 19, 2002

Question: "[I]s he [Saddam] an imminent threat to U.S. interests, either in that part of the world or to Americans fight here at home?"

Answer: "Well, of course he is."

--White House Communications Director Dan Bartlett Daniel Joseph Bartlett (born June 1, 1971), was a Counselor to the President in the U.S. presidential administration of George W. Bush. The position was previously held by Karen Hughes, who vacated the post in 2002.  CNN CNN
 or Cable News Network

Subsidiary company of Turner Broadcasting Systems. It was created by Ted Turner in 1980 to present 24-hour live news broadcasts, using satellites to transmit reports from news bureaus around the world.
 interview, January 26, 2003

"Leaving Saddam Hussein in possession of weapons of mass destruction Weapons that are capable of a high order of destruction and/or of being used in such a manner as to destroy large numbers of people. Weapons of mass destruction can be high explosives or nuclear, biological, chemical, and radiological weapons, but exclude the means of transporting or  for a few more months or years is not an option, not in a post-September 11th world."

--Secretary of State Colin Powell presentation to the UN Security Council, February 5, 2003

"[W]e cannot live under the threat of blackmail. The terrorist threat to America and the world will be diminished the moment that Saddam Hussein is disarmed."

--President George W. Bush address to the nation, March 17, 2003

Question: "[W]e went to war, didn't we, to find these--because we said that these weapons were a direct and imminent threat to the United States? Isn't that true?"

Answer: "Absolutely. One of the reasons that we went to war was because of their possession of weapons of mass destruction. And nothing has changed on that front at all."

--White House spokesman Ari Fleischer press briefing, May 7, 2003
COPYRIGHT 2004 American Opinion Publishing, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Worth Repeating
Publication:The New American
Date:Feb 23, 2004
Words:459
Previous Article:The disappearing WMDs.(Worth Repeating)
Next Article:The implied 9-11-Iraq connection.(Worth Repeating)



Related Articles
Service in the Sky.(Brief Article)
On-line exchanges for UK & Europe. (IT News).(Brief Article)
Sleeping giant stirs. (Freeze Frame).
IRAQ - March 18 - Saddam Rejects Bush Ultimatum.(Brief Article)
Addressing global warming. (Correspondence).
A stricter construction: in dealing with construction claims, insurance companies cannot be required to pay for damages that are imminent, only those...
Nation deserves answers.(Editorials)(Bush persists in misleading claims about Iraq)(Editorial)
Rushing forward blindly.(Editorials)(CIA's estimates of Iraqi threat were wrong)(Editorial)
IRAQ - Aug 16 - Amnesty To Shiite Militiamen.
The churches and the responsibility to protect.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles