Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,800,381 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

The lowdown on estate taxes.


The year 2004: It is the best of times; it is the worst of times.... And so it is for owners of closely held A phrase used to describe the ownership, management, and operation of a corporation by a small group of people.

In a closely held corporation, the same people often act as shareholders, directors, and officers, and no outside investors exist.
 businesses who are contemplating their own mortality--and the mortality of their family businesses.

It is the best of times: For heirs of people who die between now and Jan. 1, 2010, more can be transferred free of estate tax, and the top estate tax bracket Tax Bracket

The rate at which an individual is taxed due to a particular income level.

Notes:
Each income class is taxed at a different level. Generally, the more you make the more you are taxed.
 will be reduced. For people who die during January 2010, there will be no estate tax at all. In fact, the amount that can be passed tax-free was increased so much that a special deduction for family business owners was repealed as of Jan. 1, 2004. As the threat of estate taxes is reduced or eliminated, business owners can concentrate on what makes the most sense for their families and their businesses rather than concentrating on what reduces Uncle Sam's share the most.

It is the worst of times: The complexity, unpredictability and arbitrariness of the federal estate tax law has increased exponentially ex·po·nen·tial  
adj.
1. Of or relating to an exponent.

2. Mathematics
a. Containing, involving, or expressed as an exponent.

b.
. The present law concerning transfers at death provides that the rules will be different every year from now until 2011, as the advantages peak for heirs of taxpayers who die in 2009 or 2010 (depending upon their assets and their basis in their assets), and steeply decline for taxpayers who die in 2011 or thereafter. The uncertainty in the tax code means that business owners need to plan for even more contingencies than usual.

Thus, business owners must plan as if there still will be an estate tax at their death and therefore should consider all of the options traditionally considered in an estate tax regime, including:

* Family limited partnerships.

* Special valuation rules.

* Qualified family business exclusion (which would come back in 2011).

* Section 6166 deferral deferral - Waiting for quiet on the Ethernet.  of estate tax with respect to certain closely held businesses.

* Marital trusts Marital trust

A trust created to allow one spouse to transfer, during life or upon death, an unlimited amount of property to his/her spouse without incurring gift or estate tax.
 or marital Pertaining to the relationship of Husband and Wife; having to do with marriage.

Marital agreements are contracts that are entered into by individuals who are about to be married, are already married, or are in the process of ending a marriage.
 distributions.

* Life insurance trusts to pay the estate taxes.

* Planned charitable giving options.

Business owners must also plan for the possibility that there will be no estate tax at their death and therefore should consider new techniques:

* Special kinds of trusts that will qualify for additional increase in basis.

* How to hold the assets in case the estate tax is reinstated before the surviving spouse dies.

* Different kinds of planned charitable giving options.

RELATED ARTICLE: Consider non-tax issues, too

Business owners must consider non-tax issues that may have been neglected when the emphasis was on saving estate taxes. Ask yourself these three questions:

1. Should the business really be given away to the children while the business owner is alive?

2. Do any of the children have the energy, the drive, the ambition and the desire to work in the business? Should the business owner sell the business to a third party while the business is still strong? How important is it to the children that the business continue?

3. How does the parent treat the children who are not in the business? If one child is in the business, and another child owns the assets (for example, the uninvolved un·in·volved  
adj.
Feeling or showing no interest or involvement; unconcerned: an uninvolved bystander.

Adj. 1.
 child is the landlord), this could be a disaster for the one trying to run the business. If all the assets are tied up in the business controlled by the managing child, the other child is at the mercy of the managing child for many years after the parents' deaths. Should the one working hard at the business be stuck with the business? If the uninvolved child receives all stocks and bonds, and the involved child only inherits the business, what happens to the involved child if market forces beyond his control cause the business to tank? Each of these situations can be a potential land mine, which may irrevocably ir·rev·o·ca·ble  
adj.
Impossible to retract or revoke: an irrevocable decision.



ir·rev
 split the family.

Marguerite Marguerite, for French women thus named, use Margaret
Marguerite. For French women thus named, use Margaret.
marguerite, in botany
marguerite: see daisy.
 Munson Lentz and Regis Carozza are partners at Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP (Honigman) is a law firm in Michigan. Offices are located in Detroit, Lansing, Ann Arbor, and Oakland County, Michigan. Honors
Honigman is ranked the number one Michigan Law Firm by
 LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol  in Detroit, a member of the Detroit Regional Chamber.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
COPYRIGHT 2004 Detroit Regional Chamber
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Small Business CENTRAL
Author:Carozza, Regis
Publication:Detroiter
Geographic Code:1U3MI
Date:Sep 1, 2004
Words:653
Previous Article:Collecting debts: telltale signs that your customer is not going to pay.(Small Business central)
Next Article:Buying a business? Don't get snagged by hidden liabilities.(Small Business central)(letters of intent)
Topics:



Related Articles
Right data.(estate taxes)(Column)
Postmortem estate planning for small business owners.
Will the Death Tax Buy the Farm?(estate tax reform)
Tax Avoidance Is Big Business.(life insurance companies oppose estate tax repeal because it would cut into the sales of wealth-protection...
AICPA study on reform of the estate and gift tax system.(American Institute of Certified Public Accountants)
Near-death experience; Opinion: Permanent repeal of the estate tax is highly unlikely. (Life/Health: Estate Planning).
Planning ahead: while controversy and uncertainty about the estate tax rage, financial advisers can help small-business owners pass their assets on...
But Paris gets an extra Bentley.(Tilting at Windmills)(Brief Article)
Estate tax repeal: boon for private, smaller companies.
Estate tax relief and planning under the U.S.-Canada Income Tax Treaty.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles