Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,548,476 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

The lessons of ancient Rome: in The Rise and Fall of the Roman Republic, author Steve Bonta examines the lessons of the growth and decline of the Roman state in the centuries before the empire.


The Rise and Fall of the Roman Republic: Lessons for Modern America, by Steve Bonta, Ph.D., Appleton, Wisconsin: The John Birch Society, 2006, 137 pages, paperback. For ordering information, see the ad on the inside front cover.

In many ways the modern world is but an echo of ancient Rome. For that we have to thank Francesco Petrarch Petrarch (pē`trärk) or Francesco Petrarca (fränchĕs`kō pāträr`kä), 1304–74, Italian poet and humanist, one of the great figures of Italian literature.. A 14th century Italian scholar, poet, and freelance diplomat, Petrarch saw in Rome the ruins of a civilization that seemed to tower above his own. Impressed by the majesty of the glory that was ancient Rome, Petrarch spent his life recovering and then reading and studying ancient Latin literature Latin literature, the literature of ancient Rome and of that written in Latin in later eras.

Very little remains of the ritualistic songs and the native poetry of the Romans Romans, letter of the New Testament, written by St. Paul, probably from Corinth before his last trip to Jerusalem, c.A.D. 58. It is a treatise addressed to the Christian church at Rome, apparently to introduce himself and his teaching before his expected visit. The subject treated is central to Paul's teaching, justification by faith, i.e., the doctrine that believers achieve salvation through faith. and Latins before the rise of a literature. The history of the Roman Empire Roman Empire: see Rome; Byzantine Empire; Holy Roman Empire. is fundamental to the fabric of this literature: in the first three centuries of its development, the influence of captive Greece was all-pervasive.
. After him came other scholars who, heavily influenced by his example, carried on his work. Through them and their works, the political history of Rome began to inform the political philosophy of Europe and, later, America, where the American Founding Fathers were influenced by several factors, very much including their familiarity with the history of Rome.

The influence of Ancient Rome on the modern world, though seemingly diminished with time, has not ceased. Moreover, Roman history seems to run parallel to our own. Famed historian Barbara Tuchman once described the 13th century as a "distant mirror," into which we could look and see staring back at us some truths about ourselves. Even more so does Rome seem to be this distant mirror. Looking at Rome, we seem to see our own history and, possibly, our own future. Indeed, in no previous time has Roman history been more relevant than the present day.

Unfortunately, though Ancient Rome has lost none of its power to fascinate, the general level of historical literacy is such that most citizens have only a passing familiarity with the subject. They may know--from Shakespeare--that Caesar was murdered. But there is very little understanding of the relevance of that murder, of what part it played in the death of the Roman Republic and the birth of the empire, or of how the lessons of that era apply to today. And while there are plenty of fine, scholarly books on the subject, most of these are written for an audience already familiar with the story, and most focus on the Roman Empire as opposed to the republic. Yet Rome's great experiment in ordered liberty occurred during the time of the republic, which came to an end before Christ walked the Earth. And it is the history of the republic, not the empire, that is more fascinating and uplifting--and far more relevant to us today.

What is needed is a book that reintroduces the subject of Rome to the American people and that puts the focus where it belongs--on the republic! Fortunately, in Dr. Steve Bonta's The Rise and Fall of the Roman Republic, this book now exists.

Regular readers of THE NEW AMERICAN will recognize that the book is an adaptation of a series of articles originally appearing in this magazine. In fact, some readers suggested that these articles be compiled in a book. Now that they have been compiled, with some new material added, the result is, in this reviewer's opinion, much greater than the sum of the parts.

THE OVERTHROW OF TYRANNY

In even its earliest days, the history of Rome runs parallel to our own history. Like America, the Roman Republic was forged in revolution, created by the overthrow of an oppressive regime. In its almost legendary prehistory, Bonta recounts, Rome was led by a series of kings. Not all of these were bad and some were famous for their contributions to the growth and stability of the Roman state. One of these, Bonta notes, was the king Numa Pompilius Numa Pompilius (n`mə pŏmpĭl`ēəs), legendary king of Rome, successor to Romulus. His consort, the nymph Egeria, was said to have aided him in his rule. The origin of Roman ceremonial law and religious rites was ascribed to him.. This king, Bonta writes, "refused an offer of kingship until a large body of his fellow citizens persuaded him to accept." Immediately he "set about civilizing the Romans and abolishing the crude despotism despotism, government by an absolute ruler unchecked by effective constitutional limits to his power. In Greek usage, a despot was ruler of a household and master of its slaves. The title was applied to gods and, by derivation, to the quasi-divine rulers of the Middle East. In the Byzantine Empire, despot was a title of honor of the emperors and their relatives and of vassal princes of the tributary states and dignitaries of the Eastern Church. of his predecessor."

Unfortunately, in any monarchy, power remains concentrated in the hands of single leader and his court of advisers. No matter how saintly one king may be, the next may again turn despotic. While some of the foundational structures of the republic were created during the age of the Roman kings, their behavior nevertheless eventually caused the word "king" to become a watchword for tyranny in the minds of many later Romans.

The final such tyrant was the king Tarquin Lucius Tarquinius Priscus. He rose to high position, and on the death of Ancus Martius (c.616 B.C.) he either seized the Roman throne or was elected to it by a coalition of Etruscan families. Priscus fought successfully against the Sabines and subjugated all Latium to Rome. He is credited with the building of the first Circus Maximus and the Forum. During his reign Etruscan influences appeared in Roman politics, religion, and art. the Proud. Tarquin, Bonta notes, took the throne by murder and in turn had his political opponents rounded up so that none could oppose him. The Roman Senate, already in existence, was powerless and unable to counteract the tyranny of the king, his family, and his supporters. Being all-powerful, the Tarquins began to engage in all manner of villainy and crime, and when one of them raped a young woman who later committed suicide, the die was cast. A group of men, led by Lucius Junius Junius, English political author, known only by the signature Junius, which he signed to various letters written to the London Public Advertiser from Jan., 1769, to Jan., 1772, attacking George III and his ministers. The letters, centering on John Wilkes and the controversy over the Middlesex election, were written by a passionate opponent of the government familiar with secret government matters. Brutus Lucius Junius Brutus, fl. 510 B.C., was the founder of the Roman republic. He feigned idiocy to escape death at the hands of Lucius Tarquinius Superbus (see under Tarquin). Roman historians tell how he led the Romans in expelling the Tarquins after the rape of Lucrece, how he became one of the first praetors (there were no consuls), and how he executed his sons for plotting a Tarquinian restoration.

Decimus Junius Brutus Gallaecus, fl. 138 B.C.
, swore to rid Rome of tyranny and did so. "After a 25-year reign of terror," Bonta writes, "Tarquin the Proud was expelled from Rome, and Brutus and Collatinus [the violated woman's husband] were elected Rome's first consuls."

FROM REPUBLIC TO EMPIRE

Much like the later U.S. Founding Fathers, in the aftermath of the expulsion of Tarquin the Proud, the Romans sought to create a government ruled by law instead of one ruled by men. This "was something new," Bonta notes, "a form of government that protected the rights of its citizens while being itself limited by laws and by the diffusion of its powers into many different magistrates and governing bodies." The new government was called a res publica, or "people's thing," and it was constructed in such a way as to prevent the accumulation of absolute power.

Nevertheless, the republic faced a number of challenges in its history, all of which have their parallels in U.S. history and all of which Bonta covers. Most significantly, the Roman Republic fought a series of hot and cold wars against another regional superpower, Carthage, that nearly saw the defeat of the Roman state. Just as the United States emerged stronger after conflicts like the Second World War, the Roman Republic emerged from its wars with Carthage as the strongest military power in the West, able to confront and defeat nearly any foe. And, like the United States in the 20th century, the Romans struggled with class division and the accumulation of wealth. Much like today's Democrats and Republicans, in Rome two opposing political parties, the Populares and the Optimates, faced off on either side of the political divide. And, like the parties of today, both were creatures of the aristocratic classes and had very little interest in anything that did not serve to increase their own power. Naturally, the stresses of such a political climate led to disturbances and finally to revolution. With the murders of Caesar and Cicero, the last vestiges of the old republic were swept away, replaced by the empire.

The incredible story of the Roman Republic is one of drama and beauty, peopled with heroes and scoundrels. With grace and clarity, Bonta, an accomplished scholar, covers the entire panorama of this history. The book is finely illustrated with plates highlighting key subjects and the typeface is elegant and easy on the eyes. While it would make a fine addition to any library, every citizen concerned about the future of the United States should read this book in order to look into that distant mirror and learn, perhaps, how we in the 21st century can avoid the fate of that earlier republic.
COPYRIGHT 2006 American Opinion Publishing, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Behreandt, Dennis
Publication:The New American
Article Type:Book review
Date:Jun 12, 2006
Words:1259
Previous Article:Selling his brand of salvation: the novel The Da Vinci Code not only attacks the basic tenets of Christianity but promotes a religious outlook based...
Next Article:Heroics in Hawaii.(Larry Cummin bravery)(Brief article)
Topics:



Related Articles
The fall of the Roman Empire: the military explanation.
The Excellent Empire: The Fall of Rome and the Triumph of the Church.
Byzantium: The Decline and Fall.
The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.(Review)
Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today.(Review)
Epic of the West.(The Rise of Western Christendom: Triumph and Diversity, 200-1000 AD, 2nd ed.)(Book Review)
Bell, Hilari. Rise of a hero.(Brief Article)(Book Review)
Greenwood Press.(Book Review)
How immigration destroyed Rome. Oxford historian Peter Heather has reexamined the fall of Rome. His new book, The Fall of the Roman Empire, holds...
Master of Gaul.(Brief article)(Book review)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles