Printer Friendly

The great gold heist: claiming a "national emergency," an American president once seized much of the wealth of America's citizens. Could it happen again?

It was the biggest bank heist of the century, perhaps of all time. For sheer audacity, it rivals the fantastic scheme of the fictional arch-villain Dr. Goldfinger to raid Fort Knox in one of the most famous James Bond spy-thriller episodes. But this was no celluloid or pulp fiction, and there was no Agent 007 to foil the plot at the last minute. The mastermind who pulled off the real-life caper was no comic-book rogue; he was the president of the United States.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected our 32nd president on November 8, 1932 and assumed office on March 4, 1933, delivering his famous inaugural address, in which he assured the nation that "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself." For the vast majority of Americans suffering in the depths of the Great Depression, those were welcome and soothing words. But, as they were soon to find out, there was a great deal to fear from the new occupant of the White House with the

silken-voiced assurances.

On March 5 Roosevelt issued a proclamation convening Congress in Extra Session four days later, on March 9, 1933. However, the president did not intend to wait that long. On March 6, 1933, less than 48 hours after taking over the Oval Office, Roosevelt declared a one-week "bank holiday," from March 6 to March 13. For the first time in U.S. history, an American president had closed the nation's banks. But that was merely the beginning of a series of revolutionary acts in the celebrated "First Hundred Days" of FDR's unconstitutional restructuring of America known as the New Deal.

By what authority did the new president take this radical action? Incredibly, he cited the Trading with the Enemy Act, passed in 1917 during the administration of President Woodrow Wilson. As legal scholar Henry Mark Holzer has pointed out, "The [bank holiday] Proclamation's reference to the World War I Trading with the Enemy Act, which had long since expired, was a strained attempt to find some semblance of legal support for Roosevelt's unprecedented assumption of complete control over America's banking system."

In his essay, "How Americans Lost Their Right to Own Gold and Became Criminals in the Process," Dr. Holzer, a noted author and professor of constitutional and administrative law at Brooklyn Law School, explains how that earlier legislation--ostensibly aimed at foreign enemies, was turned into a weapon against American citizens:
 The existence of a state of war between
 the United States and Germany
 in 1917 had prompted the passage
 of the Trading with the Enemy Act,
 one purpose of which was to make
 unlawful all dealings between Americans
 and the enemies of the United
 States. However, an obscure subsection
 of the Act authorized the President
 to regulate, investigate, and prohibit
 "... any transactions in foreign
 exchange, export or earmarkings of
 gold or silver coin or bullion or currency
 ... by any person within the
 United States."


When Congress convened on March 9, Roosevelt had his ducks in a row to wrangle passage of the Emergency Banking Act. Members of Congress were not given copies of the bill, but were urged blindly to vote for the measure after only 40 minutes of debate. Citing "the serious circumstances which confront the country," House Majority Leader Joseph W. Byrns (D-Tenn.) called on the House members to hastily pass the bill and "send it to the Senate so it may become a law this evening, and thus enable the President of the United States to open the banks tomorrow."

Eager to demonstrate patriotic bipartisan support, House Minority Leader Bertrand H. Snell (R-N.Y.) urged Republicans to vote "aye," noting, "the house is burning down, and the President of the United States says this is the way to put out the fire."

Rep. Ernest Lundeen of the Minnesota Farm Labor Party was one of the few members who refused to blindly vote "aye." After the legislation was passed by voice vote and he was finally recognized on the House floor, Rep. Lundeen expressed his outrage:
 Mr. Speaker, today the Chief Executive
 sent to this House of
 Representatives a banking
 bill for immediate enactment.... No
 one has told us
 who drafted the bill. There
 appears to be a printed
 copy at the Speaker's
 desk, but no printed copies
 are available for the
 House Members. The bill
 has been driven through
 the House with cyclonic
 speed....

 We therefore have the
 spectacle of the great
 House of Representatives
 of the United States
 of America passing,
 after a 40-minute debate,
 a bill its Members
 never read and never
 saw, a bill whose author
 is unknown. The great
 majority of the Members
 have been unable
 to get a minute's time
 to discuss this bill; we
 have been refused a roll
 call; and we have been
 refused recognition by
 the Chair....

 I am suspicious of
 this railroading of bills
 through our House of
 Representatives, and
 I refuse to vote for a
 measure unseen and unknown.... We
 must not
 allow ourselves to be
 swept off our feet by hysteria, and we
 must not let the power of the Executive
 paralyze our legislative action.


But the orchestrated hysteria not only prevailed, it prevailed in a single day. By 7:30 p.m. the Emergency Banking Act had also passed the Senate, and later that night it was signed into law by President Roosevelt. The following month, on April 5, the president issued Executive Order 6102, declaring that a "national emergency still continues to exist." Therefore, he ordered: "All persons are hereby required to deliver on or before May 1, 1933, to a Federal Reserve Bank or a branch or agency thereof ... all gold coin, gold bullion and gold certificates."

Failure to comply could bring one a fine of up to $10,000 and/or a prison sentence of up to 10 years. All safe deposit boxes were sealed, and all gold that could be found, with few exceptions, was confiscated. In some cases, other contents besides gold in the sealed safe-deposit boxes were not returned to the owners. The Federal Reserve Board also instructed all banks to provide a list of customers who had withdrawn gold or converted their paper currency into gold in the month prior to the bank holiday and had not turned it in afterward as mandated.

Until that time, Americans had been able to convert their paper currency into gold, a principal hallmark of a free people. The Coinage Act of 1792 defined the dollar in terms of a weight of 371.25 grains of pure silver or of 24.75 grains of pure gold. This bimetal standard--with a fixed ratio of 15 grains of silver to 1 grain of gold--continued until 1900, when the Gold Standard Act redefined the dollar solely in terms of gold, at 23.22 grains nine-tenths pure. This set the value of the dollar at $20.67 per ounce of gold. However, after forcing citizens to relinquish their gold at $20.67 per ounce, the federal government turned around and declared the dollar was now worth $35 per ounce, a devaluation of nearly 41 percent. Which is another way of saying that the government had, in effect, reached into the wallets, purses, and savings accounts of Americans and robbed them of 41 percent of their assets in one fell swoop.

Boston University law professor John E. Hannigan, writing in the Boston University Law Review in 1934, ominously summed up the revolutionary consequences of the administration's "emergency" actions in the previous months:
 March 6, 1933, began
 that complex sequence
 ... of correlated proclamations,
 messages, declarations,
 resolutions,
 enactments, authorizations,
 embargoes, inhibitions, repeals,
 amendments, executive and
 departmental orders, regulations and
 requisitions, through which the President
 and Congress are dealing with
 the national emergency. The first
 great thing to be profoundly changed
 was the money of the people. Gold
 has been nationalized, that is, the national
 treasury has seized as its own
 all the privately treasured gold coins
 and bullion it could lay hands on .... A
 new felony has been created, merely
 having gold money, now termed
 hoarding and considered dishonest.... The
 dollar standard of the founders
 has been ... repudiated: we're off the
 gold standard; many think we're off
 the ethic standard.


One of the best-known victims of the FDR gold heist was Frederick Barber Campbell, the first American to be indicted as a felon for owning gold. Several months before Roosevelt's proclamation, Campbell deposited 27 bars of gold at Chase National Bank, with Chase agreeing in writing to safeguard the gold for a fee, and to return the gold to Campbell upon demand. Campbell, a Manhattan attorney, put up a spirited defense, but was squashed by the New Deal steamroller, nonetheless--along with millions of American "hoarders," who were stripped not only of their gold, but of other valuables and personal, sentimental effects as well.

Nearly 50 years later, the government began releasing the confiscated contents of safe deposit boxes to the descendants of FDR's victims. On October 15, 1981, the front page of the Wall Street Journal carried an article entitled, "Treasury's Vaults Disgorge Treasures from the Depression: Memorabilia, Valuables Taken When Banks Were Closed May Be Opened For Claims." The Journal piece reported that the contents ranged from pocket watches, old coins, and silver flatware to old dresses, photographs, guns, stocks, bonds, deeds, trusts, and wills.

What caused this unexpected turn of events? Had the federal leviathan belatedly developed a conscience, a sense of justice, or a constitutional impulse? Unfortunately, no. Treasury officials simply decided they needed the vault space where the plunder was being stored for a new computer center.
COPYRIGHT 2007 American Opinion Publishing, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:HISTORY--PAST AND PERSPECTIVE
Author:Jasper, William F.
Publication:The New American
Date:Jun 11, 2007
Words:1594
Previous Article:Kindness "R" us.
Next Article:Really ready.


Related Articles
Will Congress turn its back on you: when it comes to immigration? The immigration legislation before Congress casts the die not only for cultural and...
Social Security for immigrants: at President Bush's behest, plans have been created, and are being implemented, for a "totalization agreement" with...
Taking the high road: in Texas and Oklahoma, citizens are showing that the NAFTA Superhighway Goliath can be taken on and stopped by fearless Davids.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters