The flap over President Bush's National Guard service shrinks daily, but does not disappear.
* The flap over President Bush's National Guard service
shrinks daily, but does not disappear. (For clinching details in the
case, please see Byron York's piece, page 33.) While Democrats have
had to back off Terry McAuliffe's assertion that Bush was AWOL, or
Michael Moore's that he was a "deserter," they expect the
press to parse every living Guardsman's recollection of the
twentysomething lieutenant's presence, or absence. The controversy
obscures the larger comparison between the wartime service of Lts. Bush
and Kerry. Kerry's is of course more impressive. John Kerry went to
Vietnam; George W. Bush went flying. Yet this contrast itself obscures
the largest question, which is the convictions and judgment of the two
men. Battlefield experience is not the only military experience. John
Kerry polluted his record by accusing his comrades, and his country, of
non-existent crimes; as an officeholder, he has been for or against war
as liberalism and expediency direct. George W. Bush pulled a somewhat
aimless life together; became president; then found himself in the midst
of a new kind of world war, which he has fought with determination and
skill. Americans in uniform and out should be able to tell which is
preferable.
COPYRIGHT 2004 National Review, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
|
Reader Opinion