The first shark: to bite or not to bite?Fossil fish scales discovered in Colorado reveal that sharks have been haunting the seas since the middle of the Ordovician period Ordovician period (ôrdəvĭsh`ən) [from the Ordovices, ancient tribe of N Wales], second period of the Paleozoic era of geologic time (see Geologic Timescale, table) from 505 to 438 million years ago. 455 million years ago, a time far more ancient than paleontologists previously thought. Yet these early sharks may not have brandished the fearsome maws of their modern descendants. In fact, the ancient fish may have lacked jaws altogether, says Ivan J. Sansom of the University of Birmingham Due to Birmingham's role as a centre of light engineering, the university traditionally had a special focus on science, engineering and commerce, as well as coal mining. It now teaches a full range of academic subjects and has five-star rating for teaching and research in several in England. Sansom and his colleagues describe the new finds in the Feb. 15 Nature. "We've got enough evidence to say that these are sharks. But we don't have enough evidence to say that they were sharks with jaws," says Sansom. The scales measure about 1 millimeter in length and have multiple, overlapping cusps that look like a miniature mountain range. The distinctive shape matches scales from later sharks, leading Sansom and his colleagues to identify the Colorado species as a shark or shark ancestor. Until now, the oldest shark remains had hailed from the Silurian period Silurian period (sĭl r`ēən, sī–) [from the Silures, ancient tribe of S Wales, where the period was first studied; named by the British geologist R. I. , some 25 million years younger. The Colorado fossils fall into a peculiar taxonomic tax·o·nom·ic also tax·o·nom·i·caladj. Of or relating to taxonomy: a taxonomic designation. tax position, comments paleontologist Philippe Janvier of the National Center for Scientific Research in Paris. Because they resemble later sharks so closely, the Ordovician animals qualify as the closest relatives of the gnathostomes, or jawed jawed adj. Having a jaw or jaws, especially of a specified kind. Often used in combination: slack-jawed; the jawed fishes. Adj. 1. vertebrates. "There is no known jawless vertebrate vertebrate, any animal having a backbone or spinal column. Verbrates can be traced back to the Silurian period. In the adults of nearly all forms the backbone consists of a series of vertebrae. All vertebrates belong to the subphylum Vertebrata of the phylum Chordata. with similar scales," Janvier says. Yet without more complete fossils, scientists cannot tell whether these early fish actually possessed teeth or jaws. The appearance of jaws marked a major leap in the evolution of vertebrates, in some ways almost as dramatic as the jump from invertebrates to the first vertebrates (SN: 2/3/96, p. 74). Whatever their dental details, the Ordovician sharks apparently shared the ancient oceans with true gnathostomes. "Almost certainly, there must have been jawed vertebrates at the time," says Janvier. He notes that recent fossil finds from China indicate the existence of several different jawed fish early in the Silurian, which began 438 million years ago. This diversity implies that the first jaws must have appeared well before then, presumably pre·sum·a·ble adj. That can be presumed or taken for granted; reasonable as a supposition: presumable causes of the disaster. by the time of the Colorado shark. Other paleontologists, however, argue that gnathostomes may not have evolved that early. "It is debatable whether these scales came from animals that we would identify as gnathostomes. I'm not fully convinced," says Mark Wilson Mark Wilson may refer to:
Wilson argues that proof would come only when scientists find complete fossils. He asks why, if gnathostomes existed in the Ordovician, scientists haven't found complete fossils of these animals. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

r`ēən, sī–)
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion