Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,679,458 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

The feds vs. medical pot: One toke over the line. (Citing).


LAST MAY, THE U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the feds could shut down six California co-ops that were distributing medical marijuana in accordance with state law. Back in 1996, Golden State voters had overwhelmingly passed Proposition 215, allowing patients with a doctor's recommendation to use pot for serious medical conditions such as chronic pain and severe nausea, In effect, the nation's highest court decided that state laws legalizing cannabis for medical se weren't worth a dime bag.

In the aftermath of the May ruling, patrons and proprietors of California's 50-odd medical marijuana clinics waited anxiously to see how aggressive the federal crackdown would be. In October the Drug Enforcement Administration The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) was established in 1973 by President richard m. nixon as part of the Justice Department, thus uniting a number of federal drug agencies that had often worked at cross-purposes.  (DEA DEA - Data Encryption Algorithm ) began to answer that question. Agents surveilled or busted several co-ops, finishing their tour with the Los Angeles Cannabis Resource Center, a West Hollywood clinic that provided pot on site to 960 patients suffering from AIDS, epilepsy, cancer, glaucoma glaucoma (glôkō`mə), ocular disorder characterized by pressure within the eyeball caused by an excessive amount of aqueous humor (the fluid substance filling the eyeball). , and other serious illnesses. Thirty armed federal agents seized 400 marijuana plants, computers, financial documents, and medical records.

On December 10, authorities informed Scott Imler, the co-op's director and founder, that he would face a grand jury on December 20. At press time, he was still awaiting its decision on whether to indict in·dict  
tr.v. in·dict·ed, in·dict·ing, in·dicts
1. To accuse of wrongdoing; charge: a book that indicts modern values.

2.
 4im for defying the Supreme Court ruling, a charge for which he could face hard time.

"I don't want to whine or duck here," says the 43-year-old Imler, his voice s4gesting the bemusement be·muse  
tr.v. be·mused, be·mus·ing, be·mus·es
1. To cause to be bewildered; confuse. See Synonyms at daze.

2. To cause to be engrossed in thought.
 of someone who's facing up to 10 years in prison for helping sick people. "I knew what I was getting into, and I'm prepared to take whatever responsibility comes my way. But I would imagine...they're focusing on me because the minute they raise the issue of conspirators CONSPIRATORS. Persons guilty of a conspiracy. See 3 Bl. Com. 126-71 Wils. Rep. 210-11. See Conspiracy. , it would be a whole different kettle of fish kettle of fish
n. pl. kettles of fish
1. A troublesomely awkward or embarrassing situation.

2. A matter to be reckoned with:
."

Imler is referring to the coop's wide swath of supporters. In addition to employing several staff members, the Cannabis Resource Center was created with the close cooperation of the city council and local law enforcement agencies A law enforcement agency (LEA) is a term used to describe any agency which enforces the law. This may be a local or state police, federal agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). . If the federal government tries to hone in on "co-conspirators," it may well have to indict the entire paid staff of the city of West Hollywood (an independent municipality surrounded by Los Angeles).

Elsewhere in California, co-ops continue to treat the patients who depend on them amid growing uncertainty. Says the Rev. Lynnette Shaw, founder of the Main County Alliance of Medical Marijuana: "Mostly, we're all very worried on behalf of the patients. if the DEA closes everybody, it will throw all those patients back into the arms of the gangsters. And that's exactly what the gangsters want. So in a sense, the DEA is working for the gangsters."
COPYRIGHT 2002 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:pot illegal regardless of its use
Author:Rimensnyder, Sara
Publication:Reason
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Mar 1, 2002
Words:440
Previous Article:Buddhism and animism. (Brickbats).(no christians allowed; Laos)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Balance sheet.(short news)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Selling pot: the pitfalls of marijuana reform.
The pot war in England.(proposal to legalize marijuana)(Column)
In Davidson, North Carolina, police officer.(Brief Article)
Marijuana may boost heart attack risk.(Brief Article)(Statistical Data Included)
STATE WILL STILL AID FEDS IN POT CASES.(News)
STATE POLICE, PROSECUTORS TO HASH OVER MARIJUANA LAW.(News)
Crack kills, pot giggles. (Off the Map).(comparison between crack cocaine and marijuana)
WHERE THERE'S MARIJUANA, THERE'S FIRE COMPLAINTS SPUR CONSIDERATION OF RULES FOR POT CLINICS.(News)
EDITORIAL REEFER MADNESS STATE INACTION ON MEDICAL-POT ABUSES DRAWS IN FEDS.(Editorial)(Editorial)
The 'Godfather' of the movement takes shots at 'Pot Doctors'.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles