Printer Friendly
The Free Library
5,669,962 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

The feds step in: will the new federal accountability standards spur school improvement? (Forum).


ROM HIS FIRST DAYS IN OFFICE, President Bush made education reform one of his chief priorities. Congress responded with a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act “Title I” redirects here. For other uses of "Title I", see Title I (disambiguation).

The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) (Pub.L. 89-10, 79 Stat. 77, ) is a United States federal statute enacted April 111965.
 (ESEA ESEA Elementary and Secondary Education Act
ESEA E-Sports Entertainment Association
ESEA Eurocopter South East Asia
) that requires states to ensure that all students reach a certain level of proficiency within the next 12 years. Schools that fail to meet their achievement targets will face sanctions as harsh as being "reconstituted"--their staff being fired and forced to reapply Re`ap`ply´   

v. t. & i. 1. To apply again.

reapply vivolver a presentarse, hacer or presentar una nueva solicitud

 for their jobs. The new legislation has enjoyed nearly universal bipartisan support, but the future remains uncertain. Are ESEA's goals realistic, or do they fundamentally misunderstand mis·un·der·stand  
tr.v. mis·un·der·stood , mis·un·der·stand·ing, mis·un·der·stands
To understand incorrectly; misinterpret.
 the nature of schools and learning? Do the states have the resources and the political will necessary to meet these more stringent requirements? And will school leaders take up the challenge or throw their hands up in frustration? No one has concrete answers, but one thing is sure: accountability is now the coin of the realm.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Hoover Institution Press
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Education Next
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Mar 22, 2002
Words:154
Previous Article:Break the link: the fact that schools of education could no longer rely on a captive body of aspiring teachers would expose them to the cleansing...
Next Article:Unwarranted intrusion: isn't it ironic that Republicans sponsored the single largest--and potentially the single most damaging--expansion of federal...
Topics:



Related Articles
Correction, Please!(criticism of education spending)(Brief Article)
Unwarranted intrusion: isn't it ironic that Republicans sponsored the single largest--and potentially the single most damaging--expansion of federal...
A new partnership. (Forum).
Randomly accountable: failing to account for natural fluctuations in test scores could undermine the very idea of holding schools accountable for...
Swing state: the downs and ups of accountability in California. Will the state's political leadership stay the course this time around?...
Ruly crew: lessons from the Clinton administration's attempts to cajole the states into complying with federal mandates for standards-based reform....
Let them eat tests: Bush bill opens a new era in federal education policy.(George W. Bush)
Puzzled states: the success of the No Child Left Behind Act largely depends on the states' willingness and ability to implement the law. Will...
No distortion left behind: the New York Times education columnist gets it wrong.(check the facts)
National standards: should the federal government tell schools what to teach?

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles