Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,546,709 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

The cost of Sarbanes-Oxley.


A recent AMR Research report found that 77 percent of U.S. companies will spend more on information technology (IT), business process change, corporate governance, and/or consulting this year in efforts to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. According to the report:

* 52 percent of public companies are in the process of implementing their Sarbanes-Oxley compliance plans

* 33 percent are still evaluating the issues at hand

* Only 15 percent reported that they have not yet begun to evaluate options, but most plan to start soon

* 61 percent expect business process change will be required

* More than 61 percent are looking for external assistance from audit firms and/or consultants

The report found that many companies are forming cross-functional Sarbanes-Oxley project teams and seeking help from external audit/risk management consultants to define, analyze, and improve best practices for managing their internal controls.

But compliance costs companies. According to a study by Foley & Lardner and KRC Research, Sarbanes-Oxley implementation is expensive. The study of 450 companies found that audit fees for organizations with a market capitalization of around $1 billion rose by 35 percent in 2002. The report blamed the rising costs on the new corporate governance laws and greater demands from the market to ensure sound financial statements. Boston-based AMR Research estimates that the act's requirements present a gargantuan "Y2K-like" task that will cost organizations as much as $2.5 billion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers' latest "Management Barometer," a quarterly survey of top executives in large, multinational businesses--including technology, financial services, and consumer and industrial products and services--found that Sarbanes-Oxley implementation has resulted in changes in controls and compliance practices at nearly 85 percent of large U.S. multinational companies. Fully 82 percent expressed confidence that their company is in compliance with the law, while 13 percent said they had more to do.

Only 13 percent said it has been "very costly" to make their company Sarbanes-Oxley-compliant, and 44 percent said it has been "somewhat costly." More than 50 percent said implementation has not been costly, but 85 percent of executives surveyed expect costs to rise long term. (For more information, visit www.barometersurveys.com.

Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Costs

Executives were polled in October 2002 and June 2003. With more time
and experience, far greater numbers have found it costly to bring
their entire company into compliance:

                            October 2002   June 2003

Extremely costly            --             3%
Very costly                 3%             13%
Somewhat costly             29%            44%
Total                       32%            60%

More executives also are concerned about the long-term cost of
control and compliance:

                            October 2002   June 2003

Much higher long-term
  costs expected            12%            27%
Somewhat higher long-term
  costs expected            59%            58%
Total                       71%            85%

Source: PricewaterhouseCoopers' www.barometersurveys.com
COPYRIGHT 2003 Association of Records Managers & Administrators (ARMA)
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Up front: news, trends & analysis
Author:Swartz, Nikki
Publication:Information Management Journal
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Sep 1, 2003
Words:440
Previous Article:Report says NARA lacks e-records skills.(Up front: news, trends & analysis)
Next Article:Are you ready for the next cyber attack?(Up front: news, trends & analysis)(U.S. Department of Homeland Security will establish an office to focus on...
Topics:



Related Articles
Legislation, regulation, and the role of the AMC: as illustrated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, AMCs play a key role in informing and protecting their...
Comment: mixed signals a year after Sarbanes-Oxley.(Will Justice Be Served?--Banking & Finance Special Report)(Sarbanes-Oxley was a solution for...
Advantage: Sarbanes-Oxley.(domestics news)
Revisiting Sarbanes-Oxley: was the well-intentioned landmark legislation slapped together too quickly?
PCAOB issues internal control standards ED.(financial Reporting)(Brief Article)
Ask FERF (financial executives research foundation) about ... private company compliance with section 404.(resources)
Is software the solution for Sarbanes-Oxyley.(FinancialReporting)
Under the gun: Sarbanes-Oxley compliance requires significantly more investment than public insurers anticipated. Now mutuals may have to comply as...
FEI Financial Reporting Blog: expanded scope.(WEB SERVICES)
L.A. firms lured by foreign exchanges; launching IPOs is easier but U.S. markets still goal.(FINANCE)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles