Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,550,337 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

The camel's back; EPA order adds to onerous municipal burden.


COLUMN: IN OUR OPINION

We'll leave it to the politicians and experts to thrash out whether the EPA's recent order of another major upgrade of the Upper Blackstone wastewater treatment plant reflects environmental necessity or bureaucratic arrogance. But wherever the truth lies, the appalled reaction of city officials certainly is justified.

The Environmental Protection Agency has determined that nutrient levels in the Blackstone River are too high, promoting growth of algae and other organisms that decompose and reduce oxygen in the water below healthy levels. Indeed, while the river has come a long way in the past generation, it undoubtedly has yet to reach the pristine near-drinkable state most residents would consider ideal.

Still, the river certainly has been greatly improved. Under federal mandate under the 1972 Clean Water Act, area communities have invested heavily in the cleanup effort. Worcester, in conjunction with Auburn, Holden, Millbury and West Boylston, established the Upper Blackstone Water Pollution Abatement District. The district is in the midst of a $176 million renovation scheduled to be completed in 2009 - a mandate largely responsible for a three-fold increase in rates.

Clouding the issue is skepticism about the scientific foundation of the order. The reasoning behind it, according to DPW commissioner Robert L. Moylan, is contradicted by other studies and the EPA's own advisory board. Also open to debate is the assumption that the main cause of high nutrient levels is discharges from the treatment plant - as opposed to surface runoff and other largely uncontrolled non-point sources.

In different circumstances, local officials might have taken the new EPA order in stride, despite doubts about the cost-benefit of the estimated $200 million in upgrades. At a time when residents may be asked to accept higher tax bills and reduced services to close a potential $21 million budget gap, the specter of more steep increases in water rates is hard to accept.

Wanton pollution of waterways is unjustified, unwise and illegal. But with municipal costs for health insurance, pensions, fuel and other expenses rising far in excess of revenue growth, it is little wonder that cash-strapped municipal officials view the EPA order as the straw that well might break the camel's back.

NAME: UPPER BLACKSTONE WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT DISTRICT

COPYRIGHT 2007 Worcester Telegram & Gazette
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:EDITORIAL
Publication:Telegram & Gazette (Worcester, MA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Apr 6, 2007
Words:370
Previous Article:Allman gigs set for August.(ENTERTAINMENT)
Next Article:Aid eases hunger, HIV/AIDS in Africa.(COMMENTARY)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles