Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,548,476 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

The blandification of Ronald Reagan.


You know the one about fighting for Ronald Reagan's soul? Well there are those of us who have been pretty serene on the subject, confident that the President can resist the Faustian bid ("Give me four more years in the White House, Satan, and thereafter you may do as you like with my soul"). But when the Devil is a blatant as David Gergen David Richmond Gergen (born May 9, 1942) was a political consultant and presidential advisor during the Republican administrations of Nixon, Ford, and Reagan. He was also a campaign staffer for George H.W. Bush's 1980 presidential campaign.  was last week, the faithful need to come in with holy-water sprinklers.

Now, david Gergen was the Director of Communications Director of Communications is a position in the private and public sectors. The Director of Communications is responsible for managing and directing an organization's internal and external communications.  at the White House for several years before pulling out a few months ago to return to private life. You will not be surprised to learn that he thinks Mr. Reagan needs to bring "new energy and ideas into a second term." You will not be surprised that new ideas "New Ideas" is the debut single by Scottish New Wave/Indie Rock act The Dykeenies. It was first released as a Double A-side with "Will It Happen Tonight?" on July 17, 2006. The band also recorded a video for the track.  always, but always, involve more social spending at home together with more regulation; and, abroad, more appeasement appeasement

Foreign policy of pacifying an aggrieved nation through negotiation in order to prevent war. The prime example is Britain's policy toward Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
.

Mr. Gergen refers to the "hard-core conservatives" who back Mr. Reagan and who will destroy him, if he follows their counsel. What is the kind of thing a hard-core conservative believes in? "They are willing to support tax simplification, but only if there is no increase in the tax burden."

What is so hard-core about that? The overwhelming majority of the people of California, voting yes on Proposition 13, voted to limit taxes on real property to 1 per cent. Hard-core? We are paying 39 per cent of the GNP GNP

See: Gross National Product
 in America--39 per cent of all the goods and services In economics, economic output is divided into physical goods and intangible services. Consumption of goods and services is assumed to produce utility (unless the "good" is a "bad"). It is often used when referring to a Goods and Services Tax.  produced by rich and poor alike--to sustain government. Does it really require hard-corism to consider 39 per cent an excessive levy?

Mr. Gergen says that the hard-corites desire that Mr. Reagan get on with his social agenda, including school prayer, tuition tax credits, and anti-crime mesures. "But is this the agenda that really best serves Ronald Reagan?" If the Reagan legacy is "to be positive"? The planted axiom in the formulation demands that the answer should be no.

Why "no"? i say "yes." I wish the children in public schools to be free to pray for the exorcism exorcism (ĕk`sôrsĭz'əm), ritual act of driving out evil demons or spirits from places, persons, or things in which they are thought to dwell. It occurs both in primitive societies and in the religions of sophisticated cultures.  of the Soviet Union as well as for the englightment of Mr. Gergen, and I do not see why that is hard-core. It may be right, m ay be wrong; but if hard-core is measured by the tenacity with which a group of voters desires, for instance, that the crime rate should diminish, it is no more hard-core to desire progress in a social agenda than to desire, as the hard-core people did twenty years TWENTY YEARS. The lapse of twenty years raises a presumption of certain facts, and after such a time, the party against whom the presumption has been raised, will be required to prove a negative to establish his rights.
     2.
 ago, progress in the matter of civil rights. Then Mr. Gergen goes one better: "The Administration in the second term must either raise taxes and stretch out defense increases or face an end to recovery." Now, in the first place, these are not exclusive alternatives. In the secon dplace, more taxes could be raised by flat-tax revisions, such as have been recommended by hard-core Demoracts Senator Bradley, and Mr. Gephardt--and George McGovern.

But the zinger zing·er  
n. Informal
1. A witty, often caustic remark.

2. A sudden shock, revelation, or turn of events.

Noun 1.
 is the foreign-policy plank for the New Reagan. You've guessed it? right. He must turn his "creative energies to building a different, closer relationship with Moscow." Why not a "Soviet specialist" to advise him? Say, Richard Barnet from the Institute for Policy Studies. Can't "more heavyweight strategic thinkers be found to come into the Administration in a second term"? Somebody like, oh, Herbert Scoville? You will notice that the softer you are, in that world, the heavier you are. Churchill would have been such a lightweight he'd have floated.

What Mr. Gergen has in mind for President Reagan's second term is that he should ignore conservative thought domestically and, abroad, revise weakward our policy of resistance to Soviet enroachment. Not bad, this agenda, for one man. It calls merely for undoing the Federalist Papers Federalist papers
 formally The Federalist

Eighty-five essays on the proposed Constitution of the United States and the nature of republican government, published in 1787–88 by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay in an effort to persuade
, and unliving Lenin. And progressing into history with the force and personality of a vanilla milkshake.
COPYRIGHT 1984 National Review, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1984, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Buckley, William F., Jr.
Publication:National Review
Article Type:column
Date:Apr 6, 1984
Words:649
Previous Article:Glenn.
Next Article:Neil Kinnock and unilateralism. (column)
Topics:



Related Articles
Reagan today.
Chinese encores.
Tracking the slurs. (distortions of the president's statements)
Summit?
Achieving Christ in San Francisco.
The new nationalism.
The heckler. (anti-abortion hecklers)
Reagan, RIP? (Iran-Contra arms sale affair and its effect on Reagan presidency)
Executive cowardice. (Ronald Reagan to testify in trial of John Poindexter)
Reagan and history. (how academics, journalists and political consultants have come to recognize the contribution of former President Ronald Reagan's...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles