The administrative process and constitutional principles.
Separation of Powers separation of powers: see Constitution of the United States.
separation of powers
Division of the legislative, executive, and judicial functions of government among separate and independent bodies.
The basic precept An order, writ, warrant, or process. An order or direction, emanating from authority, to an officer or body of officers, commanding that officer or those officers to do some act within the scope of their powers. Rule imposing a standard of conduct or action. of separation of powers is that the power of the government is divided into three departments: legislative, executive, and judicial.(1) No department may exercise the powers of another. The legislature also is prohibited from delegating to administrative agencies its functions or the functions of other departments.(2) This division of power is designed to "minimize the threat of ... tyranny" that arises when all the powers of the government are concentrated in the hands of only one body.(3) From this basic structural concept, the courts have evolved a variety of doctrines that constrain the exercise of the state's police powers police powers n. from the 10th Amendment to the Constitution, which reserves to the states the rights and powers "not delegated to the United States" which include protection of the welfare, safety, health and even morals of the public. .
Central to understanding the legal doctrines The following is a list of legal concepts and principles, most of which apply under common law jurisdictions.
The judicial or legislative branches may not interfere with or exercise discretionary executive functions Executive functions is a term synonymous with cognitive control, and used by psychologists and neuroscientists to describe a loosely defined collection of brain processes whose role is to guide thought and behaviour in accordance with internally generated goals or plans. solely within the Governor's power under the Florida Constitution or statutes. These types of executive decisions generally are not subject to judicial review.(6) This ensures that the courts do not interfere with political decisions of the executive branch.(7)
The Florida courts never have defined precisely the scope of constitutionally based discretionary executive authority.(8) In various cases, however, the courts have held that discretionary executive authority includes the following: the Governor's power to appoint and suspend public officials;(9) the decision to veto a bill;(10) executive budgetary decisions;(11) the decision to charter a bank;(12) the decision to investigate law violations;(13) the decision to conduct inspections;(14) the decision to grant a pardon;(15) the decision to grant or deny a parole request;(16) the decision to commute a sentence commute a sentence v. see commutation. ;(17) the decision to grant or deny a clemency Leniency or mercy. A power given to a public official, such as a governor or the president, to in some way lower or moderate the harshness of punishment imposed upon a prisoner.
Clemency is considered to be an act of grace. petition;(18) the decision to prosecute crimes(19) or seek the death penalty;(20) the decision to pursue an appeal;(21) the decision to carry out a capital punishment capital punishment, imposition of a penalty of death by the state. History
Capital punishment was widely applied in ancient times; it can be found (c.1750 B.C.) in the Code of Hammurabi. sentence.(22)
The only time constitutionally based discretionary executive functions clearly are subject to substantive judicial review is when they are attacked for violating a provision of the Florida or federal constitution.(23) Florida courts have shown a distinct trend toward holding that very few executive decisions are discretionary, except those expressly given to the Governor under the Florida Constitution.
Most other executive decisions, once considered discretionary, now are governed by provisions of the APA (All Points Addressable) Refers to an array (bitmapped screen, matrix, etc.) in which all bits or cells can be individually manipulated.
APA - Application Portability Architecture or other statutes and are subject to judicial review. Such statutory constraints on the exercise of executive powers generally do not involve the invasion of the core discretionary functions of the executive branch.(24) In McDonald v. Dept. of Banking & Finance, 346 So. 2d 569, 577 (Fla. 1st DCA (1) (Document Content Architecture) IBM file formats for text documents. DCA/RFT (Revisable-Form Text) is the primary format and can be edited. DCA/FFT (Final-Form Text) has been formatted for a particular output device and cannot be changed. 1977), the court noted that the APA only limited the exercise of statutory discretion by executive branch officers:
In three important respects ... the APA affects the scope and manner of exercise of agency discretion: (1) the APA prescribes the process by which disputed facts are found; (2) it requires that the agency adopt as rules its policy statements of general applicability, requires agency proof of incipient policy not expressed in rules and permits countervailing evidence and argument; and (3) it requires an agency to explain the exercise of its discretion and subjects that explanation to judicial review.
The court found that these restrictions did not invade impermissibly im·per·mis·si·ble
Not permitted; not permissible: impermissible behavior.
im the executive branch's powers because the APA governs only the method by which the discretion may be exercised.(25) Functionally, such constraints on the exercise of executive discretion have enhanced substantially the power of the courts to review executive decisions.(26)
The statutory requirements of the APA in most cases do not convert the executive decisionmaking process into a quasi-judicial proceeding.(27) However, the decision in Board of County Commissioners of Brevard County v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1993), suggests these issues may be reexamined by the courts. In the context of the APA, however, this issue may not be confronted directly because the Governor is not subject to the APA when exercising constitutional powers.(28)
Executive Budgetary Powers and Invasion of Legislative Power
There has been substantial litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.
When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation. over the scope of legislative and executive power in the budgetary area. In Chiles v. Children A, B, C, D, E, & F, 589 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1991), the Florida Supreme Court reaffirmed basic separation of powers principles in discussing the constitutionality of the statutory system for maintaining a balanced budget Balanced budget
A budget in which the income equals expenditure. See: budget.
A budget in which the expenditures incurred during a given period are matched by revenues. when tax receipts have not kept pace with expenditures.(29)
Since the Chiles decision, courts actively have reviewed executive decisions to determine if they encroach encroach v. to build a structure which is in whole or in part across the property line of another's real property. This may occur due to incorrect surveys, guesses or miscalculations by builders and/or owners when erecting a building. on the powers of the legislative branch. The decision in Hillhaven Corp. v. Dept. of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 625 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), rev. den., 634 So. 2d 623, epitomizes these decisions. In Hillhaven, the validity of a Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services rule that eliminated semiannual adjustments in the per diem per diem adj. or n. Latin for "per day," it is short for payment of daily expenses and/or fees of an employee or an agent. Medicaid rate for nursing homes from January 1, 1990, through June 30, 1990, was challenged. The rule was adopted in response to a budgetary shortfall during the 1989-90 fiscal year No other explanation was offered for the adoption of the rule. The court found the rule invalid for two reasons. First, it had the effect of altering the legislative appropriation for this aspect of the Medicaid program, precisely what the decision in Chiles held unconstitutional. Second, the rule was an invalid exercise of delegated authority Delegated authority is an authority obtained from another that has authority since the authority does not naturally exist.
Typically this is used in a government context where an organization that is created by a legitimate government, such as a Board, City, Town or other because it contravened the express statutory directions to the agency found in F.S. [sections] 409.266(1).
The issues concerning the division of authority over the budget have been clarified to some extent by the addition of Art. IV, [sections] 13 and Art. III, [sections] 19 to the Florida Constitution.
Lawmaking through the legislative process is the exclusive prerogative of the legislature. The legislature has the primary responsibility to shape public policy in Florida by the exercise of its lawmaking powers. As the court noted in State v. Atlantic Coast Line The Atlantic Coast Line may refer to:
Although the legislature, within appropriate limitations discussed below, generally may delegate quasi-legislative power to administrative agencies, there are some areas in which no delegation is permitted. In various cases the courts have identified matters that cannot be entrusted to another branch or an administrative agency: the conduct of the impeachment impeachment, formal accusation issued by a legislature against a public official charged with crime or other serious misconduct. In a looser sense the term is sometimes applied also to the trial by the legislature that may follow. process;(33) initial appropriation decisions;(34) reduction of appropriations;(35) imposition of a tax;(36) definition of a crime;(37) creation of officers and other public positions;(38) reapportionment reapportionment: see legislative apportionment. of the legislature;(39) qualification of members of the legislature;(40) manner in which legislature allocates resources for public education;(41)
If a matter involves a core legislative power, that power must be exercised by the legislature or not at all.(42)
Conflict Between Legislative and Executive Authority
Even when a matter concerns an area traditionally within a core legislative power, conflicts still can arise with the power of other branches and individual rights. In Chiles v. United Faculty of Florida, 615 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 1993), the court examined limitations on the legislature's budgetary power arising from the doctrine of separation The doctrine of separation, also known as the doctrine of non-fellowship, is a belief among some religious groups that the members of a church should be separate from the world and not have association with those who are of the world. of powers and other constitutional limitations. The issue was whether the legislature could eliminate pay raises for public employees negotiated through a collective bargaining agreement The contractual agreement between an employer and a Labor Union that governs wages, hours, and working conditions for employees and which can be enforced against both the employer and the union for failure to comply with its terms. and funded by the legislature. The court held that the "legislature has authority to reduce previously approved appropriations to pay public workers' salaries made pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement, but only where it can demonstrate a compelling state interest ... [and] no other reasonable alternative means of preserving its contract with public workers, either in whole or in part" exists.(43) The court noted that the separation of powers doctrine supports this result because it "does not allow the unilateral and unjustified legislative abrogation The destruction or annulling of a former law by an act of the legislative power, by constitutional authority, or by usage. It stands opposed to rogation; and is distinguished from derogation, which implies the taking away of only some part of a law; from Subrogation, of a valid contract."(44) But see Justice Overton's dissent (once Governor calls special legislative session to deal with revenue shortfall, all prior appropriations are subject to being voided void·ed
Having the central area cut out or left vacant, leaving an outline or narrow border: a voided lozenge. by legislature's exercise of its subsequent appropriation power); and Justice McDonald's dissent (legislature has exclusive control over appropriation of public funds See Fund, 3.
See also: Public ; revenue shortfall is emergency satisfying compelling state interest requirement under majority's approach and any other result would permit large variety of contracts to limit legislature's budgetary authority).
The United Faculty of Florida decision also raised the question of the relationship between the executive power to negotiate agreements and legislative control of the budget. Local governmental bodies and the legislature may still "trump" the agreement by failing to fund it because
[t]he legislative body has the absolute right and obligation under the constitution to fund or not fund any agreement entered into ... [with its] employees.... Any other rule would permit the executive branch of government, by entering into collective bargaining agreements calling for additional appropriations, to invade the legislative branch's exclusive right to appropriate funds.(45)
The constitutionally guaranteed right to collective bargaining collective bargaining, in labor relations, procedure whereby an employer or employers agree to discuss the conditions of work by bargaining with representatives of the employees, usually a labor union. cannot restrict the power of appropriation.(46)
It is the duty of the courts to enforce the legislature's policy choice when it is properly before them in a judicial proceeding.(47) The role of ultimate interpreter of the law may not be used by the courts to interfere with the legitimate exercise of power reserved by the Florida Constitution for other branches of the government.(48) The most thoughtful comment on this problem was offered by Justice Kogan in his concurring opinion Noun 1. concurring opinion - an opinion that agrees with the court's disposition of the case but is written to express a particular judge's reasoning
judgement, legal opinion, opinion, judgment - the legal document stating the reasons for a judicial decision; in Garden v. Frier, 602 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 1992). He noted that when a statute is so ambiguous and vague that the courts have no clear guidance to its meaning, the courts violate the doctrine of separation of powers if they use the interpretative process to provide the necessary specificity to save the statute from being held unconstitutional. If the courts do so, they usurp u·surp
v. u·surped, u·surp·ing, u·surps
1. To seize and hold (the power or rights of another, for example) by force and without legal authority. See Synonyms at appropriate.
2. the legislature's power and obligation to declare clearly what the public policies are in the statutes. With very few exceptions, the task of developing public policy is reserved to the legislature. The courts are ill-equipped to assume it and should avoid using the interpretative process to accomplish such results.(49)
Some executive and legislative decisions are beyond the powers of the courts to review because they concern the core functions of those branches.(50) In McPherson v. Flynn, 397 So. 2d 665,667 (Fla. 1981), the court noted that it would refrain from deciding any matter in a judicial forum that was "committed to a coordinate branch of government by the demonstrable text of the constitution." Such decisions become subject to judicial review only when the legislature specifically has authorized it by statute.(51)
The courts have inherent power to do all things reasonably necessary for the administration of justice.(52) Certain issues must be resolved in a judicial proceeding or are part of the inherent judicial power. Examples include the following:
1) Submission of a budget for the judiciary to the legislature.(53)
2) Regulation of the legal profession.(54)
3) Establishment of rules of practice and procedure for the courts.(55)
4) Control of the judiciary-related duties of the clerk or deputy clerk.(56)
5) Contempt power.(57)
6) Sentencing in a criminal case.(58)
7) Determination of restitution in a criminal case.(59)
8) Determination of programs a juvenile delinquent juvenile delinquent n. a person who is under age (usually below 18), who is found to have committed a crime in states which have declared by law that a minor lacks responsibility and thus may not be sentenced as an adult. should enroll in for rehabilitation.(60)
9) Awarding of common-law-based monetary damages Monetary damages, in civil law, refers to compensation given to an injured party by a liable party. Monetary damages may be restitution, a penalty, or both. .(61)
10) Interpretation of a contract between two private parties.(62)
11) Constitutionality of a state statute.(63)
12) Constitutionality of an administrative rule.(64)
13) Access to court records.(65)
14) Waiver of immunity for judicial and quasi-judicial officers.(66)
The other branches of the government may not interfere with the courts in the performance of their duties.(67) The legislature, however, may pass statutes that relate to the core functions of the judiciary without impermissibly invading them.(68)
The legislature may not prescribe court procedure by statute, because control over court procedure is vested in the judiciary.(69) However, when rules of procedure govern quasi-judicial bodies they must be based on a delegation of authority The action by which a commander assigns part of his or her authority commensurate with the assigned task to a subordinate commander. While ultimate responsibility cannot be relinquished, delegation of authority carries with it the imposition of a measure of responsibility. from the legislature, because the constitutional power of the Florida Supreme Court over procedure is limited to Article V courts.(70) The courts, however, will interpret a statute to avoid holding it unconstitutional on this ground, if possible.(71) In some cases the court avoids this constitutional problem by accommodating the statutory policy in an amendment to the applicable rule of procedure.(72)
(1) FLA. CONST CONST Construction
CONST Under Construction
CONST Commission for Constitutional Affairs and European Governance (COR) . art. II, [sections] 3.
(2) See Chiles v. Children A, B, C, D, E, & F, 589 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1991); D.P.v. State, 597 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1992), overruled on other grounds 645 So. 2d 987. See also Coalition for Adequacy & Fairness in School Funding v. Chiles, 680 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1996).
(3) Burris, Administrative Law administrative law, law governing the powers and processes of administrative agencies. The term is sometimes used also of law (i.e., rules, regulations) developed by agencies in the course of their operation. , 1987 Survey of Florida Law, 12 Nova L. REv. 299,302 (1988). See Locke v. Hawkes, 595 So. 2d 32, 36 (Fla. 1992) ("the control or influence by one branch of another branch's internal operating procedures could interfere with the independence of the second branch and possibly place the enforcing branch in a superior position"); Chiles v. Children, A, B, C, D, E, & F, 589 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1991).
(4) Immigration immigration, entrance of a person (an alien) into a new country for the purpose of establishing permanent residence. Motives for immigration, like those for migration generally, are often economic, although religious or political factors may be very important. & Naturalization naturalization, official act by which a person is made a national of a country other than his or her native one. In some countries naturalized persons do not necessarily become citizens but may merely acquire a new nationality. Service v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983); Chiles v. Children A, B, C, D, E, & F, 589 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1991).
(5) See Askew a·skew
adv. & adj.
To one side; awry: rugs lying askew.
[Probably a-2 + skew. v. Cross Key Waterways, 372 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 1979). But see Board of County Commissioners of Brevard County v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1993) (analyzing nature of powers exercised in zoning area).
(6) Nelson v. Lindsey, 151 Fla. 596, 10 So. 2d 131 (1942).
(7) See Trianon Park Condominium Association, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 468 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 1985); Webb v. Hill, 75 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 1954). See also Heckler heck·le
tr.v. heck·led, heck·ling, heck·les
1. To try to embarrass and annoy (someone speaking or performing in public) by questions, gibes, or objections; badger.
2. To comb (flax or hemp) with a hatchel. , Secretary of Health & Human Services v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821 (1985); Carter v. City of Stuart, 468 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 1985).
(8) See Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. Railroad Commissioners, 100 Fla. 538, 129 So. 876 (1930).
(9) Schneider v. Sweetland, 214 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 1968); Bruner v. State Commission on Ethics, 384 So. 2d 1339 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1980). See Jones v. Chiles, 638 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 1994) (FLA. STAT. [sections] 440.45, limiting Governor's power to reappoint Re`ap`point´
v. t. 1. To appoint again.
reappoint vt → volver a nombrar
reappoint vt (to job) → judges of compensation claims, unconstitutional on separation of powers grounds); Wright v. Florida Medical Examiners Commission, 625 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 1993) (legislature may not establish system reducing Governor's appointment process to ministerial act ministerial act n. an act, particularly of a governmental employee, which is performed according to statutes, legal authority, established procedures or instructions from a superior, without exercising any individual judgment. , because nominating body functionally would be exercising Governor's appointment power); FLA. CONST. art. III, [sections] 14; art. IV, [sections] 1(f); art. IV, [sections] 6.
(10) Thompson v. Graham, 481 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. 1986) (Governor cannot use veto power to alter or amend substantive legislation or to reassign vetoed appropriations); Brown v. Firestone, 382 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 1980). See also Chiles v. United Faculty of Florida, 615 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 1993).
(11) See Chiles v. Children A, B, C, D, E, & F, 589 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1991) (McDonald, J., dissenting); Brown v. Firestone, 382 So. 2d 654; In the Interest of R. V., 626 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1993).
(12) Dickinson v. Washington Federal Savings Washington Federal Savings is the savings and loan subsidiary of Washington Federal, Inc., a bank holding company based in Seattle, Washington that trades on the NASDAQ under the symbol WFSL. It has operations in Washington, Idaho, Oregon, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, and Texas. & Loan Association of Miami Beach, 281 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1973), aff'd, 282 So. 2d 167.
(13) See Thompson v. State, 342 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 1977).
(14) Trianon Park Condominium Association, Inc., 468 So. 2d 912.
(15) See Sandlin v. Criminal Justice Standards & Training Commission, 531 So. 2d 1344 (Fla. 1988); Sullivan v. Askew, 348 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 1977), cert. den., 434 U.S. 878.
(16) Owens v. State, 316 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 1975).
(17) Phillips v. Board of Pardons Part of the executive branch of state government authorized to grant pardons, and restore civil and political rights, to individuals convicted of crimes. A pardon, in the legal sense, releases an individual from punishment or penalty, but does not necessarily exonerate them of guilt. , 487 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1986).
(18) Asay v. Florida Parole Commission, 649 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 1994), cert. den., 116 S.Ct. 591; Parole Commission v. Lockett, 620 So. 2d 153, 154-155 (Fla. 1993) ("[T]he clemency process is derived solely from the constitution and is strictly an executive branch function, and ..., consequently, the Legislature, by statute, may neither preempt pre·empt or pre-empt
v. pre·empt·ed, pre·empt·ing, pre·empts
1. To appropriate, seize, or take for oneself before others. See Synonyms at appropriate.
a. nor overrule The refusal by a judge to sustain an objection set forth by an attorney during a trial, such as an objection to a particular question posed to a witness. To make void, annul, supersede, or reject through a subsequent decision or action. the clemency rules without violating the separation of powers doctrine expressly set forth in article II, section 3, of the Florida Constitution"); Bundy v. State, 497 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 1986). But see Turner v. Wainwright, 379 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1980), dism., 384 So. 2d 1377, aff'd 389 So. 2d 1181 (application of open meetings statute to Parole Commission meetings did not interfere with executive authority over clemency).
(19) State v. Bloom, 497 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1986).
(20) State v. Donner, 500 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 1987).
(21) Friends of the Everglades, Inc. v. Zoning Board, Monroe County, 478 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1985), rev. den. 488 So. 2d 830.
(22) Goode v. Wainwright, 448 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 1984), cert. den. 466 U.S. 932.
(23) See Goldwater v. Carter Goldwater v. Carter, 444 U.S. 996 (1979), was a United States Supreme Court case which was the result of a lawsuit filed by Senator Barry Goldwater and other members of the United States Congress challenging the right of President Jimmy Carter to , 444 U.S. 996 428 (1979); Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship steamship, watercraft propelled by a steam engine or a steam turbine. Early Steam-powered Ships
Marquis Claude de Jouffroy d'Abbans is generally credited with the first experimentally successful application of steam power to navigation; in 1783 his Corp., 333 U.S. 103 (1948); Meyers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926); Brown v. Firestone, 382 So. 2d 654.
(24) See, e.g., Coleman v. Austin, 521 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1988).
(25) Compare Turner v. Wainwright, supra A relational DBMS from Cincom Systems, Inc., Cincinnati, OH (www.cincom.com) that runs on IBM mainframes and VAXs. It includes a query language and a program that automates the database design process. (application of open meetings statute did not interfere impermissibly with executive authority), with Locke v. Hawkes, 595 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1992) (application of public records statute to members of legislature constitutional).
(26) See FLA. STAT. [sections 120.68(1) (right to judicial review of all final agency action).
(27) Dickinson v. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Association of Miami Beach, 281 So. 2d 603.
(28) FLA. STAT. [sections] 120.52(1)(a); see Thompson v. State, 342 So. 2d 52.
(29) See FLA. CONST. art. VII, [sections] 1(d). But see Chiles, 589 So. 2d 260 (McDonald, J., dissenting) (balanced budget provision of Florida Constitution imposes obligation on all branches of government and is not solely legislative responsibility); FLA. CONST. art. IV, [sections] 13; art. III, [sections] 19(g). (1992 amendments to Florida Constitution granting executive and judiciary greater authority to reduce appropriations in such cases).
(30) Chiles, 589 So. 2d 260;Askew v. Cross Key Waterways, 372 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 1979); Jones v. Dept. of Revenue, 523 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1988); A.T v. State, 516 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1987); T.D.v. State, 486 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); State ex rel ex rel. conj. abbreviation for Latin ex relatione, meaning "upon being related" or "upon information," used in the title of a legal proceeding filed by a state attorney general (or the federal Department of Justice) on behalf of the government, on the instigation of . Dept. of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Upchurch, 394 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 5th D.C.A. 1981).
(31) Carter v. City of Stuart, 468 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 1985); Askew, 372 So. 2d 913; State ex rel. Fulton v. Ives, 123 Fla. 401, 167 So. 394 (1936).
(32) Smith v. State, 537 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 1989) (invalidating statute that authorized Supreme Court to adopt sentencing guidelines); Foley v. State ex rel. Gordon, 50 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 1951).
(33) FLA. CONST. art. III, [sections] 17. See Nixon v. United States
Nixon v. United States, 506 U.S. , 506 U.S. 224 (1993) (impeachment is political question left to Congress).
(34) FLA. CONST. art. III, [sections] 12; art. VII, [sections] 1(c); Florida House of Representatives The Florida House of Representatives, one of the two Chambers of the Florida Legislature, is composed of 120 members, each representing a district.
Representatives are elected to two-year terms during even-numbered years. v. Martinez, 555 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 1990); State ex rel. Kurz v. Lee, 121 Fla. 360, 163 So. 859 (1935); State ex rel. Davis v. Green, 95 Fla. 117, 116 So. 66 (1928).
(35) Chiles, 589 So. 2d 260. But see FLA. CONST. art. III, [sections] 19(c); art. IV, [sections] 13, reducing the scope of the legislature's power in this area.
(36) Whitney v. Hillsborough County, 99 Fla. 628, 127 So. 486 (1930). See FLA. CONST. art. VII, [sections] 1(a).
(37) B.H. v. State, 645 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 1994), cert. den. 515 U.S. 1132 (administrative agency may not be delegated open-ended authority to determine elements of crime); State v. Mitchell, 652 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1995) (legislature invalidly delegated authority to Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms when it authorized bureau to define crime by declaring device destructive under FLA. STAT. [sections] 790.001(4)).
(38) Petition of The Florida Bar, 61 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 1952).
(39) FLA. CONST. art. III, [sections] 16. But see FLA. CONST. art. III, [sections] 16(f) (conferring reapportionment power on Florida Supreme Court if legislature fails to adopt valid reapportionment plan).
(40) FLA. CONST. art. III, [sections] 2. See Harden v. Garrett, 483 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 1986).
(41) Coalition for Adequacy & Fairness in School Funding, Inc. v. Chiles, 680 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1996).
(42) See B.H. v. State, 645 So. 2d 987; State v. Mitchell, 652 So. 2d 473.
(43) Chiles, 615 So. 2d at 673.
(45) Sarasota County School District v. Sarasota Classified / Teachers Association, 614 So. 2d 1143, 1148 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1993), dism., 630 So. 2d 1095.
(46) Sarasota County School District, 614 So. 2d 1143.
(47) Griffin v. Stonewall stone·wall
v. stone·walled, stone·wall·ing, stone·walls
a. Insurance Co., 346 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1977).
(48) See Fraternal Order of Police The Fraternal Order of Police is a US-based organization of sworn law enforcement officers. It is the world's largest organization of rank and file sworn officers, with over 2100 local lodges and over 325,000 members. , Metropolitan Dade County, Lodge No. 6 v. Dept. of State, 392 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 1980); Ervin v. Collins, 85 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 1956), 59 A.L.R.2d 706; Shupe v. State, 516 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 5th D.C.A. 1987) (sentence depriving prisoner of gain time was not option given to trial courts by legislature).
(49) See generally 1 ENGLAND & LEVINSON, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE MANUAL [subsections] 1.04(a)-(c) (Butterworth 1979-1997).
(50) See Johnson v. State, 660 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 1995), cert. den., 116 S.Ct. 1550; Board of County Commissioners of Brevard County v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1993) (rezoning decisions characterized as executive or quasi-judicial); A.T. v. State, 516 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1987). But see Metropolitan Dade County v. Jennings Construction Co., 196 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1967) (rezoning ordered but no consideration given to separation of powers).
(51) See FLA. CONST. art. III, [subsections] 2, 15; Locke v. Hawkes, 595 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1992); Harden v. Garrett, 483 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 1986) (no inherent power to review contested elections).
(52) Rose v. Palm Beach County, 361 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 1978).
(53) FLA. CONST. art. III, [sections] 19(c); Fla. Stat. [subsections] 216.023(2), (6), 216.031; Chiles v. Children A, B, C, D, E, & F, 589 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 1991).
(54) The Florida Bar Advisory Opinion HRS Nonlawyer Counselor, 518 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 1988); The Florida Bar In re Advisory Opinion Concerning Applicability of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, 398 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 1981).
(55) FLA. CONST. art. V, [sections] 2(a). See TGI TGI Tribunal de Grande Instance
TGI Target Group Index
TGI Thank God It's Friday (US restaurant chain)
TGI Tracheal Gas Insufflation
TGI Tumor Growth Inhibition
TGI Trato Gastrointestinal (Portugese) Friday's, Inc. v. Dvorak, 663 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 1995).
(56) Johnson v. State, 660 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 1995), cert. den. 116 S.Ct. 1550.
(57) Ex parte [Latin, On one side only.] Done by, for, or on the application of one party alone.
An ex parte judicial proceeding is conducted for the benefit of only one party. Earman, 85 Fla. 297, 95 So. 755 (1923). See Ducksworth v. Boyer, 125 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 1960); Walker v. Bentley, 660 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1995), aff'd 678 So. 2d 1265.
(58) Patterson v. State, 513 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 1987).
(59) Larson v. State, 572 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. 1991); Reynolds v. State, 598 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
(60) L.M. v. State, 587 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1991).
(61) Broward County v. La Rosa, 505 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 1987); Laborers' International Union of North America The Laborers' International Union of North America (LIUNA, often shortened to just the Laborers' Union) is an American and Canadian labor union formed in 1903. As of 2005, they have about 700,000 members, including about 80,000 in its Mail Handler's division. , Local 478 v. Burroughs, 522 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1988), rev. dism., 531 So. 2d 167, modified, 541 So. 2d 1160. See Smith v. Dept. of Insurance, 507 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 1987) (limitation on noneconomic tort damages violated right of access to courts).
(62) Peck Plaza Condominium v. Division of Florida Land Sales & Condominiums, Dept. of Business Regulation, 371 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1979).
(63) Palm Harbor Special Fire Control District v. Kelly, 516 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 1987).
(64) Key Haven Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Trustees board of trustees Politics The posse of thugs who oversee an institution's administration. See Board of directors. of Internal Improvement Trust Fund, 427 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 1983); State ex rel. Dept. of General Services v. Willis, 344 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1977); Dept. of Revenue of Florida v. Young American Builders, 330 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1976). See F.S. 120.52(8), 120.56(1)(a), (2)(a).
(65) See Times Publishing Co. v. Ake, 660 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 1995); Locke v. Hawkes, 595 So. 2d 32. See also FLA. CONST. art. I, [sections] 24; FLA. R. JUD. ADMIN. 2.051.
(66) Office of the State Attorney, Fourth Judicial Circuit of Florida v. Parrotino, 628 So. 2d 1097, 1099 (Fla. 1993) (legislature cannot waive immunity of judicial or quasi-judicial officers, because "subjecting the judiciary and state's quasi-judicial officers to punitive lawsuits for official actions obviously ... would impinge upon the independence of these offices"). See State, Dept. of Corrections v. Vann, 650 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1995), aff'd, 662 So. 2d 339 (courts should not find tort cause of action against other branches).
(67) The Florida Bar v. Massfeller, 170 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 1964).
(68) See, e.g., Makemson v. Martin County, 491 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 1986) (attorney fee statute for representation of indigent indigent 1) n. a person so poor and needy that he/she cannot provide the necessities of life (food, clothing, decent shelter) for himself/herself. 2) n. one without sufficient income to afford a lawyer for defense in a criminal case. criminal defendants); The Florida Bar v. Moses, 380 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 1980) (legislature, with sufficient standards, may authorize "qualified" nonlawyers to practice law before administrative agencies). But see The Florida Bar re Advisory Opinion HRS Nonlawyer Counselor, 547 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 1989) (nonlawyers may not represent HRS in certain juvenile proceedings).
(69) FLA. CONST. art. V, [sections] 2(a); Williams v. First Union National Bank of Florida, 591 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1992).
(70) Reddick v. Charles W. Infinger Construction, 617 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), rev. den., 626 So. 2d 207 (rules of procedure governing workers' compensation workers' compensation, payment by employers for some part of the cost of injuries, or in some cases of occupational diseases, received by employees in the course of their work. hearings adopted by Florida Supreme Court not based on court's power under Art. V, [sections] 2(a), but rather delegation of authority by statute). See also In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure, 664 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 1995).
(71) See Dept. of Health & Rehabilitative Services of State of Florida v. Crossdale, 585 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1991).
(72) See TGI Friday's, Inc. v. Dvorak, 663 So. 2d 606.
Johnny C. Burris of the Shepard Broad Law Center Shepard Broad Law Center, founded in 1974, is the law school of Nova Southeastern University. The Law Center is housed in Leo Goodwin Sr. Hall, located on Nova Southeastern University's main campus in Davie, Florida and is named after university founder Shepard Broad. at Nova Southeastern University History
Originally named Nova University of Advanced Technology, the university was chartered by the state of Florida in 1964 as a graduate institution in the physical and social sciences. , Ft. Lauderdale, received his J.D. from Northern Kentucky University Northern Kentucky University is a public, co-educational university located in Highland Heights, Kentucky, seven miles (11 km) southeast of Cincinnati, Ohio. Enrollment is currently about 14,200 students. in 1978 and LL.M LL.M Legum Magister (Master of Laws) . in 1984 from Columbia University.